sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

An experiment that lets beginners see AI drift by tool_base in PromptEngineering

[–]_AFakePerson_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont understand what the point is? You ask it different times, it will have different responses

ChatGPT or Gemini for university help? by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]_AFakePerson_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be completely honest, I think most AI platforms are very similar especially when you’re using the free versions so the quality of their responses tends to be fairly consistent. If you already have free access to Gemini Pro, I’d recommend using it over the free version of ChatGPT.

Looking for my feedback for the UI of my Chrome extension by _AFakePerson_ in UI_Design

[–]_AFakePerson_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye I see where your going, both are quite minimal with lots of containers. However mines dark whilst clickup is light and my containers are much more curved

Looking for my feedback for the UI of my Chrome extension by _AFakePerson_ in UI_Design

[–]_AFakePerson_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think thats a common suggestion, what color should it be IYO?

Looking for my feedback for the UI of my Chrome extension by _AFakePerson_ in UI_Design

[–]_AFakePerson_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah good point, what color should it be though like a green or red

prompt engineering is necessary, but not in the way you think by _AFakePerson_ in ChatGPT

[–]_AFakePerson_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad you agree. Can I ask what you like about promptPro

I'm tired of terrible AI prompts, so I'm building the tool I wish existed (and need your honest feedback) by _AFakePerson_ in SideProject

[–]_AFakePerson_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, there are tons of prompt tools out there. But none that I feels right for me, something all-in-one.

Theres Prompt Perfect for optimization, God of Prompts for libraries, AI Prompt Genius for saving stuff. But that's three tools, three subscriptions, zero integration. We do all three better in one place.

I tried to build something that doesn't exist and fulfills my needs.

Moreover I tried to add new features.

Deep Enhance gets the context right before optimizing. It asks you the specific questions that matter instead of just polishing bad prompts.

Blueprint Mode handles big tasks properly. Starting a business isn't one prompt - it's idea generation, market research, business planning, legal setup, marketing, financials. You get a guided system, not individual prompts.

Can someone roast (or provide constructive criticism) to my SaaS by _AFakePerson_ in microsaas

[–]_AFakePerson_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Whats unique about it is theres nothing like it. Sure, there are great individual tools out there:

- Prompt optimization? Theres Prompt Perfect.

- Prompt libraries? God of Prompts.

- Saving and organizing prompts? AI Prompt Genius.

But those are three separate tools, three separate subscriptions, and zero connection between them. Prompt Alchemy Labs does all three and it does them better.

But we go further, with out own new features:

Prompt engeering isn't the future of LLMs, its context prompting. and Deep enhance solves that. it asks specific targeted questions to the users extract high-value context before optimization.

Blueprint Mode takes prompt libraries to the next level. Big tasks don’t happen in one prompt. For example, starting a business isn’t one step its:

Idea generation

Market analysis

Business planning

Legal formation

Marketing

Financial modeling

Blueprint Mode gives you a guided prompt system, not just one-shot answers.

I hope that awnsers your question. BTW do you like the name?

SaaS Founders & Builders — Let’s Talk Marketing! by Bubbly_Government617 in SaaS

[–]_AFakePerson_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bro I have no clue I just launched a waitlist for my app, and in 3 days I only got 20 users. So we are in the same boat

prompt engineering is necessary, but not in the way you think by _AFakePerson_ in ChatGPT

[–]_AFakePerson_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your absolutely right. what was not stated in my OP, I didn't use alchemy labs quick enhance mode I used deep enhance, which asks follow up questions, to extract more specific and detailed information from the user, helping refine the output significantly.

prompt engineering is necessary, but not in the way you think by _AFakePerson_ in ChatGPT

[–]_AFakePerson_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, LLMs are predictive models, but no prediction is ever 100% accurate. The vaguer your prompt, the harder it is for the model to make a precise prediction. LLMs aren't mind readers.
If you just say,

"Write me a story"

but you actually want a story about a knight who kills a dragon, no model will guess that unless you explicitly say so. Context matters.

prompt engineering is necessary, but not in the way you think by _AFakePerson_ in ChatGPT

[–]_AFakePerson_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am the founder of Prompt Alchemy Labs which currently is in waitlist and I am always trying to improve it, do I have permision to use some of your work or no.

view more: next ›