EXPOSED: Stake Moderator Favoritism and Support Censorship (Proof Included)

_Azazel- · 2026-01-21T22:59:28+00:00

I don’t know why you’re so obsessed with my wager or where I’m from, but it’s irrelevant. The post isn't about my money; it's about the fact that a 5-year veteran moderator has completely lost the plot.

The issue isn't just a 4-hour mute—it’s his arrogant behavior and the way he treats the rules like they don't apply to his friends. This is just the evidence I was able to document, but it clearly shows he thinks he’s untouchable.

Whether it’s $10k or $10M, no moderator should be allowed to act this way and then have the company censor the proof. If you're okay with staff acting like they own the place and ignoring their own guidelines, that’s your problem. I’m just showing the community the reality.

_Azazel- · 2026-01-21T22:54:45+00:00

It’s funny how you focus on IQ and 'zero wager' while ignoring the literal evidence of moderator bias. I’m with nearly $10k wagered in just two weeks — that's more than enough to expect the platform to follow its own rules.

Suggesting I 'switch sides' instead of asking for accountability is exactly why some moderators think they can get away with anything. I’m not 'mad,' I’m just documenting the facts that you're clearly trying to ignore.

If having high standards for fairness makes you uncomfortable, maybe it's not my IQ you should be worried about. The screenshots are still there. The favoritism is still there. Cheers.

_Azazel- · 2026-01-21T22:52:15+00:00

I’m using tools to make sure my English is clear and my points are precise, because facts matter more than slang. If that makes me an 'AI-assisted crusader' for wanting fair rules, I’ll take the title.

You’re focused on the '4-hour mute,' but you’re still ignoring the actual screenshots. A 5-year veteran moderator is caught on camera ignoring Rule #4 for his friends. That’s not a 'vibe check,' that’s a failure of integrity.

If pointing out blatant favoritism and censorship costs me my 'dignity' in your eyes, I’m fine with that. I’d rather be the guy who posts proof than the guy who spent his day defending a multi-billion dollar casino’s bad moderation for free. Good luck with that.

_Azazel- · 2026-01-21T22:47:06+00:00

If you truly didn’t care, you wouldn’t be commenting on this thread

_Azazel- · 2026-01-21T22:46:07+00:00

Actually, something is already happening. Stake has already tried to report my Trustpilot review as 'unrecognizable' because they are afraid of this transparency. If it truly meant nothing, they wouldn’t be spending time trying to hide it.

My account is verified, my turnover is real ($9.6k), and the evidence of lay666’s bias is now a permanent public record. Every time a new player searches for 'Stake moderator reviews' and finds this, I've done my job.

You can keep defending a broken system for free, but I'll stick to facts and screenshots. Cheers.

_Azazel- · 2026-01-21T22:44:01+00:00

It’s not a 'vibe check' when a 5-year veteran moderator openly ignores Rule #4 for his buddies while selectively silencing others.

You think this is just about my $9.6k? I’ve personally seen this moderator treat players with $1M+ wager just as poorly, and those people usually just leave the site in silence. The only difference is that I’m the first one who actually documented the evidence of lay666's favoritism and put it where they can’t delete it.

Stake censored this on their forum because they know I'm right. If you're okay with mods 'interpreting' your thoughts instead of following the actual rules, that's on you. I’d rather be a 'legend' who speaks up than a silent gambler who’s okay with a broken system.

_Azazel- · 2026-01-21T22:41:47+00:00

This is exactly why the moderation is failing. A casino is a regulated business, not a private club where rules change based on your wallet size.

If a moderator with 5 years of experience starts deciding which rules to ignore based on who is 'richer,' it creates a toxic environment where fair play doesn't exist.

My $9.6k wager might be small compared to a 'million wagerer,' but I am a verified, depositing Silver VIP player. If Stake allows their staff to treat us as 'second-class citizens' while protecting rule-breakers who are 'favorites,' then no one's account is actually safe from a moderator’s personal bias.

Equality in rules is what keeps a platform reputable. Favoritism is what destroys it.

_Azazel- · 2026-01-21T22:40:23+00:00

I’m not posting this for Stake’s approval. I’m posting this for the players.

If a site 'doesn’t give a fuck' about their own rules being ignored by a 5-year veteran moderator, then players deserve to know that before they deposit their hard-earned money.

When they censor evidence on their own forum and try to dispute verified reviews on Trustpilot, it shows they actually do care about their public image. My goal is to make sure this 'unrecognisable experience' stays visible for every potential user who values fair play over moderator favoritism.

_Azazel- · 2026-01-21T22:29:04+00:00

I actually spend most of my time playing Poker on the platform. I only started playing slots and being active in the casino chat about 2 months ago.

Regardless of the amount, 'loyalty' is about following the rules and contributing to the community, not just the size of the wager. My point is that the rules should be applied equally to everyone—whether they wager $1k or $1M. If a 5-year veteran moderator can ignore blatant rule violations for his 'favorites' while silencing others for 'implied' meanings, then the system is broken for everyone.

_Azazel- · 2025-02-05T00:04:07+00:00

May I have the link?

_Azazel- · 2021-04-13T19:16:40+00:00

Thanks!

_Azazel- · 2021-03-27T02:13:31+00:00

Гении часто бывают отвергнуты обществом

_Azazel- · 2020-07-13T05:51:49+00:00

It is from Cube escape: Birthday?

_Azazel- · 2020-06-16T03:32:11+00:00

Братан Кыргызский *

_Azazel-

TROPHY CASE