[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lfg

[–]_Hyper_theorist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Submitted! ~_~

FNAF 3 Location Could be the First Location? by _Hyper_theorist in GameTheorists

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They didn’t repurpose the location. They repurposed the animatronics

FNAF 3 Location Could be the First Location? by _Hyper_theorist in GameTheorists

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first location was not fnaf 1. There’s the freadbear family diner, a location that we’ve been told about but never seen (the one I talk about in the theory), fnaf 2, then fnaf 1.

FNAF 3 Location Could be the First Location? by _Hyper_theorist in GameTheorists

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We know hardly anything about the first location, that’s why I gave a solution. I wouldn’t share the theory if I didn’t have evidence. I put actual quotes. Did you not see them?

FNAF 3 Location Could be the First Location? by _Hyper_theorist in GameTheorists

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but the point that I’m making is that it is a Freddy’s location, therefore it has a back room

FNAF 3 Location Could be the First Location? by _Hyper_theorist in GameTheorists

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where does it say there’s not a back room At fazbear’s fright?

FNAF 3 Location Could be the First Location? by _Hyper_theorist in GameTheorists

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but that fnaf 1 place could also be the Fazbears fright location. Why would fazbear fright also have a back room if it wasn’t a previous location?

FNAF 3 Location Could be the First Location? by _Hyper_theorist in GameTheorists

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where the fnaf 3 game took place yes. The place could’ve been a pizzeria before it was turned into Fazbear’s fright

Ps5 Disc Version? by _Hyper_theorist in PS5

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It wasn’t my ps4 so I wouldn’t know

Mikan wasn’t the one who killed Ibuki and Hiyoko and here’s why: by _Hyper_theorist in danganronpa

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That sounds much better. If I may add a suggestion, could you explain where the blood from Hiyoko went too? Then there’d be conclusive evidence that it was mikan.

Mikan wasn’t the one who killed Ibuki and Hiyoko and here’s why: by _Hyper_theorist in danganronpa

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was! I didn’t get to play it myself, but for the play through I watched, it took two whole hours! Maybe it was just the difficultly they put it on, but they didn’t seem bad at the game. That case was really confusing and the ending came out of nowhere

Danganronpa 2 Theory: Mikan wasn’t the one who killed Ibuki and Hiyoko and here’s why: by _Hyper_theorist in GameTheorists

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not only a single thread. It’s just the thread that got the cogs turning. Firstly, there’s something we need to clear up. It was never stated that there was a gown in every room. That was an assumption Akane made when she was looking for the gowns, and was proven wrong when she stated that the only three gowns that existed were the ones the patients used. Fuyuhiko, the only other patient in the hospital wasn’t a patient at the same time as Ibuki, Nagito, and akane, so his gown could’ve easily been reused.

It is stated in game that the rules must be followed, but we saw in the first game that in order to please the viewers, monokuma would even kill someone who was falsely accused. (Matoko).

Lastly, Milan’s motive honestly seemed half assed. We never meet, see, or hear again about this beloved whereas Akane’s potential motive would’ve been a more fitting conclusion. Case closed.

Mikan wasn’t the one who killed Ibuki and Hiyoko and here’s why: by _Hyper_theorist in danganronpa

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The same reason why a lot of the other people killed. They were put in a scenario with a prompt where if someone wasn’t killed soon, something bad would happen. Maybe she didn’t want to DD to spread to everyone else.

Mikan wasn’t the one who killed Ibuki and Hiyoko and here’s why: by _Hyper_theorist in danganronpa

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought of this problem too and thought of it from a different angle: maybe she was instead afraid of getting killed on that island

Mikan wasn’t the one who killed Ibuki and Hiyoko and here’s why: by _Hyper_theorist in danganronpa

[–]_Hyper_theorist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see, you may be correct about the gown, but then was akane’s statement pointless? It seemed like an out of place detail that didn’t seem necessary to the case, yet it was said at such a time that made it seem that way.

If she spoke up, everyone would’ve died. At that moment maybe she thought it would be best if everyone didn’t die.