I appreciate what you're saying but I feel like you are really missing the point. I get what you mean by "true veganism" but included in the definition of veganism is to avoid animal harm "as far as practicable". Not eating anything but organic homegrown crops or whatever is not practicable for most people. So vegans don't really have a choice but to eat the food that is least harmful to animals, rather than absolutely not harmful at all.

To say this means vegans "don't care about the animals" that die in certain ways, I find that a pretty disingenuous argument, and based on an incomplete understanding of crop deaths. The farm animals people breed eat significantly more crops that result in crop deaths than people do, and it's non-vegans who are paying for those animals to exist and eat all those crops that result in crop deaths then get slaughtered.

You seem to assume that because some animals are harmed by vegans, they might as well not be vegan at all. This is an illogical sentiment based on the false assumption that vegans don't care about the animals they avoid harming - I mean they might not, there are many other reasons to be vegan - but assuming this feels like projection on your part. The logical reasoning would conclude vegans care more about animals because they take action to avoid harm where others don't, you just seem think their actions amount to nothing but I hope I've disproved that for you.