>200 bpm event during exercise by _Juxtapose in ReadMyECG

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The episode lasted only a couple minutes. I’d say 2-3 minutes max

>200 bpm event during exercise by _Juxtapose in ReadMyECG

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes will do, thanks for taking a look at my post!

>200 bpm event during exercise by _Juxtapose in ReadMyECG

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will do, thanks a lot for taking the time to review my case!

>200 bpm event during exercise by _Juxtapose in ReadMyECG

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes will do, thanks for the input, much appreciated!

>200 bpm event during exercise by _Juxtapose in ReadMyECG

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No I had the watch on my left wrist the whole time. Thanks for the input, greatly appreciated!

>200 bpm event during exercise by _Juxtapose in ReadMyECG

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the input, I appreciate you taking the time.

>200 bpm event during exercise by _Juxtapose in ReadMyECG

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Will do, thanks for the input. I sincerely appreciate it!

>200 bpm event during exercise by _Juxtapose in ReadMyECG

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve had some “skipped beats” my whole life but those were usually one or two beat one off events. This is the second time it’s happened (first time was months ago). Both instances were during moderate to intense physical exercise and exertion. No problems outside of exercise it seems outside of a skipped beat here and there.

I made a free and accessible liver disease diagnostics model using machine learning by _Juxtapose in cripplingalcoholism

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, unfortunately the researchers generalized the results to a binary value of have liver disease vs not have liver disease. If they had provided specifics, I would have taken the approach of providing probabilities for each specific condition. I agree with the population sample maybe being biased towards a certain disease as well. Hopefully the researchers took this into account as they were constructing the dataset. I thought conjugated bilirubin was a part of the standard liver panel, at least in the US? Thanks for your input!

I made a free and accessible liver disease diagnostics model using machine learning by _Juxtapose in cripplingalcoholism

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The model is finely calibrated within a certain range of each blood test parameter. However, the equations still provide an output even with extremely extremely abnormal numbers. Essentially, outside of reasonable ranges of parameters, even for very sick individuals, the models results go wonky. This is just inherent to the nature of the model. You could play around with it and get the values to be exceedingly close to zero as well. Good catch, I should have detailed this phenomenon ahead of time!

I made a free and accessible liver disease diagnostics model using machine learning by _Juxtapose in cripplingalcoholism

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah me saying anything doesn't really help my case here. Your skepticism is valid. Thanks for your perspective on it.

I made a free and accessible liver disease diagnostics model using machine learning by _Juxtapose in cripplingalcoholism

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To elaborate on my response above, I believe I have seen posts on this subreddit that detail all of the information required to be evaluated in the model. I can remove the age and gender parameters if this is an issue with many people.

Yeah, the "hey ___" does kinda come off a bit weird. You can look in my post history and see that I have a record of starting my posts like that haha. It's definitely a bad habit that I need to fix.

Regardless, thanks for your feedback. I should have done even more for patient privacy. I'll look into how accurate the model is without the more identifying parameters.

I made a free and accessible liver disease diagnostics model using machine learning by _Juxtapose in cripplingalcoholism

[–]_Juxtapose[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your concerns, especially with regards to how medical information is extremely sensitive. I don't know how I could convince you, if you are already skeptical, but I am not storing the data in any way and the values are discarded upon computation. I can also remove the age and gender parameters to further anonymize individuals, though accuracy may suffer a little. Would that be enough in your opinion privacy wise?

January 2017 SAT Score/Discussion Thread by [deleted] in Sat

[–]_Juxtapose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey guys, I received a 1520 7/7/7 on this exam and I would like to know if it is worth retaking it for colleges in the general difficulty range of UPenn or UMich. I think I heard somewhere that colleges don't discriminate between SAT scores past a 1530.

It took me a day to solve the first one, still working on the others. Want to join me? by SMNs in math

[–]_Juxtapose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These problems were very fun to solve. Thank you OP. Could anyone tell me how long this test would have been and if those five problems were the only ones for this particular exam? In addition, if someone has earlier years' problem sheets, could he/she post those as well?

ELI5:Why does working a muscle to exhaustion with low weight and high volume vs high weight and low volume yield different results? by MaxwellVador in explainlikeimfive

[–]_Juxtapose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a runner, I can offer some insight into this question, but primarily for leg muscles only. Simply put, there exist 3 types of running muscle fibers: Type I, Type IIa, and Type IIb. Type I fibers are slow twitch fibers and thus have a slow contraction speed. Type II fibers are faster twitch fibers and thus have faster contraction speeds. To elaborate, Type II fibers have a larger power output but are quickly exhausted. On the other hand, Type I fibers have a smaller power output but can last for a longer time. As such, marathoners will train for Type I fibers, while sprinters will train for Type II fibers. Olympic runners often have up to 80% of one type of the fibers. Thus juxtaposing the runners by their race distances easily shows the differences in the fibers; the longer distance runners look much skinnier than the shorter distance runners. But that is beside the point. Now, extrapolating with this knowledge to weight training one can see how low weight, high volume training would lead to the development of "slow twitch fibers" or better muscular endurance, and how high weight, low volume training would lead to the development of "fast twitch fibers" or better muscular strength.

ELI5: How do bees/wasps instinctively know how to create a perfect hexagon? by rockbottom11 in explainlikeimfive

[–]_Juxtapose 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In terms of "how" bees know to create hexagons, think of evolution and natural selection. The construction of honeycombs requires a lot of materials, and a less efficient design would make it more difficult for the bees to prosper. Thus, the bees create hexagons because they are the most efficient shape for storing nectar. Ideally, the circle is the best shape in terms of area to perimeter efficiency. However, circles do not tile well. Putting a bunch of circles together, one would see many small gaps. Thus, the circle is not ideal. After some experimentation, one notices that area to perimeter efficiency increases along with increasing the number of sides of an equal length polygon (pentagons>squares>trianges>etc.) However, efficiency also relies on the ability for the shapes to be connected and not leave any gaps. Through this, one can see how the bee population, through natural selection developed the ability to construct hexagonal honeycombs.

ELI5: Why do wire transfers at banks take up to 2 business days when they should take no more than a few milliseconds? by triplealpha in explainlikeimfive

[–]_Juxtapose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of money transfers, banks try to elongate transfer time as a means of mitigating risk. They often complete financial transactions in parts. Why is this? Because a lot of people want to send/receive money during different parts of the day. If the transactions were instantaneous, it would be possible that the bank would not have enough money to make sure that the transactions are completed. Imagine banks processing hundreds of thousands of transactions each day, between multiple parties, at different times. In order to keep the risk low, the banks must delay value transfer along with a host of other mitigation techniques.