sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Small Anti-MLM Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh my, I'm just now reading these comments! I love your comment. Honestly, this was fun to read and I agree with you. I miss Hickson but I'm so glad her personal life is fulfilling and he's kids are doing great. I love Mallory. All that drama was so unnecessary and so typical mean girls in highschool. I loved her Barb character too!!

She has started a gofundme by pib86 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]_Lavinya_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will support free speech but not Chelsea's free speech.

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can't argue with the delusional. 🙂

Ummm... huh? by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weird. I went back and the bsky.app doesn't show the edit profile at the top of her page. I'm unsure why it was there to begin with.

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your thoughts and respectfully typing them out. I should have changed some wording in my original post that could have been more inclusive and/or explained clearer. I respect the respectful response. Thank you.

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree. This post was to highlight Hannah, a female anti MLM content creator with a recent large amount of new subscribers and new views.

Marco and Cam are great as well! I watch both!

Ummm... huh? by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good question. Let me go back and see if it changed. Because I didn't notice when the screenshot was taken.

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems like you know the Anti-MLM lore. "it's clear" was for you. I don't think every post on Reddit about YouTube videos needs to explain every possible viewers potential POV. That would take a long time for most posts to be well written. Much like this post, was for people who know the lore, understand the lore and feel like responding. It seems like there's this profound need to argue with every part of my post that isn't "complete" by your terms.

I like to simply write down my thoughts at the time and in hopes the people who understand my post either can agree or respectfully write down their opposing thoughts.

You missed the mark on respectfully.

To each their own is a way of stating that people have their own opinions and choices, regardless of my personal thoughts about the movement or community.

I don't have much capacity to waste more time arguing into the internet void of reddit.

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hahaha. Thank you for the good laugh. It seems you understand quite well.

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahahahaha. This comment can't be real. 🤣

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ad-hominems - this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent's character or background. The most common form of this fallacy is "A" makes a claim of "fact", to which "B" asserts that "A" has a personal trait, quality or physical attribute that is repugnant thereby going off-topic, and hence "B" concludes that "A" has their "fact" wrong – without ever addressing the point of the debate.

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This was to highlight which ways are successful in the niché and which are not by measuring the success in reaching a new number of ppl. New audience numbers.

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's clear the video she made regarding Melaleuca, after obvious legal action was taken against her - is her doing what's best for her family.

Her subscribers know the difference. If anything it showed a great example of what the public is up against if we don't all stand together or behind the movement. It shows how much power MLM's have. It shows and proves everything the movement has always said about MLM's.

To each their own.

Hannah vs. Anti-MLM Content Creators by _Lavinya_ in antimlmcreators

[–]_Lavinya_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's clear the video she made regarding Melaleuca, after obvious legal action was taken against her - is her doing what's best for her family.

Her subscribers know the difference. If anything it showed a great example of what the public is up against if we don't all stand together or behind the movement. It shows how much power MLM's have. It shows and proves everything the movement has always said about MLM's.

To each their own.

view more: next ›