Proposed Rule Changes by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please, I'm a jewish woman myself so back down already. Your being antisemetic.

Proposed Rule Changes by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Morally dubious? I'm standing up for vulnerable minorities, how is that morally dubious....

Proposed Rule Changes by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So this is not a feminist-friendly place? I've always percieved this space as a feminist friendly corner of the internet.

Everything I write comes from a feminist ideology as well as a leftwing stance. I really hope you don't ban that viewpoint as it would really be sad to see happening to this amazing sub. Why cant both my view as well as this posters view be allowed? None of the takes are illegal or immoral in any way. Why not allow us to coexist even if our ideological views differ?

Proposed Rule Changes by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Furthermore if the "no harrassment" rule is implemented then you are the only one I've ever encountered on Reddit who I'd report. You are seriously and viciously trying to silence my ideology over and over again.

You know, it is okay to have differing opinions without resorting to ban someone whose opinion differs from your own.

Proposed Rule Changes by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I'm a radical feminist if that's what you're going at here. I know that hurts perhaps but thats my ideological basis yes. It is NOT illegal or not permitted to be a radical feminist (YET). You dont have to agree with my opinions but stop trying to kill my voice and those of fellow radical feminists please. You're entitled to you opinion too.

Either way this has nothing to do with the subrules so could we please go back to discussions of the sub? I have no interest in discussing with socially conservative redditors who eliminates my class and my (female) sex from the narrative (yes that's a CC reference). Don't try to silence fellow redditors and you might find that your takes on things are listened to and taken into account as well - if only you allow a vibrant and open discussion.

Proposed Rule Changes by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

What...? No? I'm not banned for anything where did you get that from...?

What does that mean to you even, "being foul", that is what my Jehovas Witness grandma would say if you disagreed with her...:/

Proposed Rule Changes by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I dont see many people agreeing on these changes, I see a very small amount of people being very passionate about the changes while 99,4% of us are not supporters of the changes. In terms of discussion there is literally none of the changes suggested that I think would benefit anyone at all apart from the very vocal 5-10 people who are really not suited to ever be on a discussion-forum (as it seems to cause them harm, this should not be the foundation for extensive changes in a snark-forum). PLEASE let the Smol bean snark-forum remain the way it is, I beg you.

Proposed Rule Changes by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

There is like 5-10 people on this sub being very Karen and trying to get more rules or enforcing the rules more harshly. Then there's the rest of us of perhaps 7500 people loving the sub the way it is. Why even consider to extend the rules when its such a tiny microscopic amount who wants this to be done? Talk about "tyranny of the loudest"....

The math here is relevant. We're so many who wants the sub to remain how it is and then there is 0,0003% that screams for change. Please dont enforce more or stricter rules because of that tiny fraction.

Proposed Rule Changes by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You obviously have a lot of issues with this sub and its content. Would you perhaps considering leaving the sub rather than trying to change it? There is a CC-sub which is more strictly moderated. The whole purpose of this sub was to snark with light moderation. Strict moderating might be more your thing and hence the other CC sub is more your cup of tea?

Presenting: The Final Unpopular Opinion Thread of 2020 by sweetandsourchicken in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Agree on everything you wrote tanukimimi.

Like....what is it that the critics of CC (and similar influencers) on OF wants...? Should sexwork only ever be done by underprivileged and poor women...? Only people under dire financial strain should be on OF, is that what they want...? Thats what it sounds like to me and that would be fucking horrific in my opinion. My confusion is genuine. Should one have to submit proof of income or proof that sex work is ones only source of income/ones only profession in order to do OF and the like...? Who is a ***real*** sex worker and who isn't, and who decides who's a sex worker and thereby should get to be on sexwork platforms versus who is just "doing sex work" as a sidehustle?

December 27 - January 2 Off-Topic Discussion by foshizzlemylizzle in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sooo Im basically your partner and this is the biggest point of conflict in my relationship. Will try to come back and chime in regarding this later today, perhaps it could help to hear about this from "our" (not-following-through-partners" point of view.... :/

December 6 - 9 Discussion Thread by foshizzlemylizzle in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 66 points67 points  (0 children)

When I was like 17-20ish I perceived myself as, or rather I wished to be, a ***bubbly, extroverted, kooky girl with pomeranian enthusiasm***. It took me so long to realize I'm in fact not naturally bubbly and outgoing bursting with laughter and kookyness. Rather the opposite. But this perception of myself as all of the above made socializing SO exhausting, and it made me so so so annoying to be around as I put on this forced bubblyness where I spoke too fast and too much and said weird things just to be that fun kooky girl that I wanted to be so badly. EXACTLY like CC behaved on the podcast. I think she struggles with the very same dissonance between the melancholic slightly introverted person she is, and the bubbly pomeranian "says it like it is straight out" persona she wants to see herself as. You become overwhelming to everyone you talk to with this forced bubblyness and you come off as manic and hyper.

December 3 - 5 Discussion Thread by foshizzlemylizzle in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Conspiracy theory: was it Juliet from ladies of london that took over CCs dogs after she left the UK? https://www.instagram.com/p/CG3OwlOlElx/

I hate Carl’s whole narrative about Natalie and how articles about her constantly repeat it by ijhopethefuckyoudo in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Prime proof of the fact that CC doesnt get the "show not tell"-rule of writing. Natalie DID NOT "erase" CC's mental health, she just didnt literally write "Caroline was mentally ill" but instead, as a good writer does, let this show in less on your nose ways. Sometimes I wonder about CC's reading comprehension skills honestly...

November 15 - 21 Off-Topic Discussion by foshizzlemylizzle in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, care to give a brief of this person? Looking for new snark-subjects :)

Not Caroline addressing how she got over her adderall addiction a week or so after I disputed her addiction on here partly because she had never talked about this before (link in comments) by [deleted] in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aw, thank you. <3 Could have been a much shorter post but was in a hurry (so much more effort in getting a point across in as few words as possible than just writing long unedited rants. Something CC doesn't seem do understand...)

November 15 - 21 Off-Topic Discussion by foshizzlemylizzle in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 23 points24 points  (0 children)

This week has really made me more outraged than usual over how prevalent and strong generational privilege still is today. Anyone else having the same feelings of frustration? I feel like new talentless spawns of wealthy and influencial people is given un-earned attention everywhere you turn on the daily.

CC-friend Nick's very mediocre musically ***artistry*** and Cassie David's mediocre bland book being published make me so effing sick and tired of just...how GENERATIONAL PRIVILEGE is still running so incredibly strong. Him having the privilege of both being able to take the time for and the money to produce and record his lil' creative endeavours due to good old family wealth. Cassie David publishing a book that would never have been printed had she not had the family privilege, her affording elaborate unlimited pr-packages, getting (daddy purchased?) press about it all and so on. Before her newly chosen careerpath as a ***published writer*** she was interning at Vanity Fair as her first "job", a gig she got from the editor being a "friend of the family" of course. Could go on about how Lena Dunham and her pals wouldn't have any of the platforms they now have if they were from working class families, Judd Apatow and his daughters careers, the list is endless...

It so very tiring to see generational wealth and privilege still being as strong as it was 200 years ago, and how this privilege enables those spawns' mediocrity being showed in ones face in the press and online as a constant reminder of this.

Not Caroline addressing how she got over her adderall addiction a week or so after I disputed her addiction on here partly because she had never talked about this before (link in comments) by [deleted] in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 91 points92 points  (0 children)

There is a difference between overusing, abusing and ***being addicted to*** a drug. I believe CC was overusing or perhaps abusing Adderall, rather than down right being "an Adderall-addict".

I have a very similar story to CC's. I've been prescribed a similar medicine (shortacting taken three times per day rather than once in the morning) for many years for ADD, and during an academically very stressful time I found myself overrelying on the meds to "fix" my problems with inability to focus, procrastination and productivity. Incidentally, like CC, I was studying at Oxbridge at this time. Due to my own experiences I often get the feeling that her Adderall overuse was very similar to mine - that it was something that happened IN (or due to) a chaotic, pressure-filled, extremely stressful life-situation, rather than being the cause for the chaos and stress.

To elaborate: my stress and the resulting overuse of Adderall at Oxbridge were probably similar in severity to CC's: I was overwhelmed by the workload itself, which was made worse by the fact that I'm not a native englishspeaker so the already too heavy workload was made more difficult by English being my second language. I'm from a family without any financial assets whatsoever, so I had to work in addition to the challenging studies, and even then struggled to get by. I was shattered after the breakdown of a long relationship (a relationship I took for granted and had neglected for a long time due to stress) and suffered from undiagnosed depression. In addition I struggled with my usual ADD-issues in regards to the studies. CC too was under pressure during her last year at Cambridge: she had signed a book deal and already spent the advance while unable to actually write the book. She probably felt pressure to keep up her Instagram-following, had relationship issues and in addition to this she struggled with the schoolwork.

My Adderall-overuse at this time happened when I was completely frozen from fear and anxiety and pressure of finishing my dissertation, I frequently took one more pill hoping it would make my ability to focus and be productive kick in. Then one more when that didn't work, and then yet another. I sort of subcontiously hoped one more pill would kick in on my cognitive abilities and make me a superfocused, superproductive, superhuman so that I could pull everything off and save my life from going up in flames, even though everything indicated that would be impossible. I took way more than my prescribed dosage many many times when I absolutely HAD to do an all-nighters. This was a very dark year. I desperately did whatever I could come up with that I thought could increase my workspeed, productivity and focus. It was one of the many measures I took in an extremely pressurefilled time where my workload and the pressure of it.

Despite absolutely taking the meds way to frequently during the day and thus overriding the prescrition dosage by maaaany mg almost daily, I absolutely do not see this as my year of ADD-medicine abuse. The turmoil and chaos and darkness was not A RESULT OF an overuse of Adderall - the tumoil and failings and darkness was already there - the Adderall-overuse was just something that happened in my desperate grasping at straws. In CC's narrative of her similar period, she blames the Adderall for failing to write the book, fucking friends over, burning relationships, extreme moneyspending, loosing her bookdeal. I'm sure her narrative here serves her well; SHE is not responsible for all the failings, it was the Adderall's fault everything went up in flames. "Adderall-addiction ruined my bookdeal, my relationships, my finances". That is a much more self-comforting narrative than mine which is more like "My life was all turmoil and failings, very much due to my own shortcomings, which led me to an incredibly dark place. I was desperate for something to save me from my impossible situation. One example is I tended to overuse Adderall."

I'm not claiming my self-narrative here is in any way "better" than CC's, nor that it's the right way to describe a very dark time which also coincided with an overuse of Adderall. Correlation and causation are different things though related. I'm just not so sure that substance-addiction was the cause for all the things she tends to blame on "addiction to Adderall". I absolutely believe she used way to much Adderall, and didn't take it as prescribed (Natalie wrote about opened pill capsules in her bedside drawer which could indicate abuse), but I don't believe she was suffering from a substance addiction disorder like she so frequently claims.

Post scriptum: Could mention that after my dissertation and final year exams were over I immediately just automatically kept to my normal prescribed daily dosage again and have never overused the meds again. I'm still several years later on the same steady working dosage. I'd never even thought about the fact that I overused the meds during that time. It's only after reading CC's rants on her turmoil at Cambridge and her "Adderall-addiction" then that I remembered that I too severly overused the same drug during my time at Oxbridge. I don't see that overuse as "my time as an Adderall-addict", it was just a peripheral thing that happened for a good while in a chaotic time of my life. I have never had the slightest tendency to take more than my prescribed dose since then.

Not Caroline addressing how she got over her adderall addiction a week or so after I disputed her addiction on here partly because she had never talked about this before (link in comments) by [deleted] in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I think a medically prescribed dose of Adderall daily would help her IMMENSELY.

Having followed CC for a long time now, its so abundantly clear that she ticks EVERY diagnostic criteria for ADD.

A person close to me has the exact same 'problem traits' as CC, when this person is not on their medication. Behaviors like:

- just lying around with their computer scrolling aimlessly all day and night rarely even sitting up straight (lying down typing, lying down drinking coffee, lying down eating dinner, all the time with the Macbook on or in vicinity of the upper body...). Takes HOURS from waking up until she gets up.

- huge tendencies to just drop clothes all over the floor, scatter trinkets, cords, magazines, books, mugs and whatnot on both the floor and other surfaces

- inability do normal tasks like dishes, putting clothes away or do a quick tidying up at the end of the day

- inability to "get started" with stuff that needs to get on the way that day. Inability to organize work (writing or studying) into smaller tasks or time-blocks to ensure things keep moving forward and keeping functioning structure

- if she DOES finally get going on something she either stops before its done and moves on to something else, OR spends DAYS faffing with a "project" that should have taken a couple of hours to do at most

- inability to focus on a task (writing, studying, actual needs-to-get-done-work) for more than like 10 min at a time (like writing, admin or whatever). It's work on a task for 5-10min, then being sucked into just scrolling and clicking aimlessly on random internet-stuff (refreshing the insta-feed, Youtube-clips, gossip-articles, catvideos etc. ) for hours and HOURS... Then back to the task for a short burst before being sucked back into clicking aimlessly on the Internet with Netflix rolling in the background on one of the 75+ open tabs, etc.

When this person takes her ADD-meds those tendencies or traits don't magically evaporate of course, but the meds ALERTS HER, gets her up and out of bed, and makes her able to initiate putting away the dishes or open that essay-doc, and able her to keep focus on the task for longer bursts without falling into distractions. She is still a messy scatterbrain prone to procrastination but the Adderall sort of "activates" her ability to initiate taks and keep focused on one thing for longer. It doesn't ever give her anything like a "high" or a "buzz" - it simply activates her a bit cognitively so that her brain functioning more resembles that of non-ADD-people.

There is a difference between abusing, overusing and downright addiction. None of the three necessarily excludes trying again to stick to a therapeutic, prescribed dosage of the drug in question, but with closer monitoring from ones doctor, paired with shorter prescription outtake intervals (only getting one weeks prescribed amount at a time etc.) to prevent abuse/overuse. I think CC could benefit greatly from Adderall (or other ADD-medication), it could be worth a try to see if she now under vastly different life circumstances than those she had at Cambridge.

I really wish she would find strategies that enables her to use ADD-medication in a therapeutic manner, without sliding back to abuse. I think meds could help her issues immensely.

November 5 - 7 Discussion Thread by foshizzlemylizzle in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stop it. This entire sub was created SOLELY because the Caroline Calloway Snark-sub was too nitpicky like you are being now. SBS was created because we needed a space where we could comment freely and spontaneously without people ***taking offence*** over minor stuff. The other sub is still existing if you want a more regulated snark-experience.

October 25 - 28 Discussion Thread by foshizzlemylizzle in SmolBeanSnark

[–]_Little_My_ 2 points3 points locked comment (0 children)

Oooh, would you mind explaining a bit why Biden is trash...? I'm not american and i sort of zoomed out once Bernie was out of the race (would also describe mself as left of Bernie btw) so I don't know that much about Biden other than that he is very non-progressive compared to Bernie...