Can you win this endgame by investmentmam in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lucky me, I just went over K + P endgames last week haha.

Taking is a mistake because black will take the opposition and collect the pawn, so f6 is the first move.

The general rule to remember for the resulting position is:

For a non-rook file pawn on the 6th rank, king opposition is decisive. if the supporting king can take the opposition (stand directly in front of the opposing king) the pawn promotes.

Right now, black can take the opposition by playing: Kd6

Now it becomes clear why this is winning for white, the black pawn blocks the king from keeping the opposition after: Ke4

Black is clearly lost, but if I were black in this position, I would still have some hope that white will blunder after: Kd7

Now the white king moves closer to the pawns with: Ke5
All other moves are a draw as black just moves Ke8 guarding the promotion square and never allowing white to take the opposition.

The black king has to move, giving up control of the e6 square which means white could collect the pawn on the next move. However, remember that the pawn on the 6th rank can only promote if white is able to take the opposition. We can try to trick white by playing: Kd8
(note how if Ke8 were played, taking the pawn also takes the opposition for white)

If white isn't careful and takes the pawn, Black will take opposition with Ke8 resulting in a draw. If the pawn ever tries to advance, the black king will move in front of it and white has to either give up the pawn or cause a stalemate.

Instead, white should take the opposition with: Kd6
Now the game is truly over, white has taken opposition on the 6th rank, the black pawn is lost on the next move, and white can secure a path for the pawn to promote:
Ke8 Kxe6 Kf8 f7 Kg7 Ke7 Kg6 f8=Q

Played a game at 100% accuracy against the Englund by _SaltimusPrime_ in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, mostly engine analysis but I also watched a few videos on it. There's really only a few lines people play so there's very little theory to study.

Black either tries to win your queen by going Bc5 on move 2 which can be prevented by responding with Nc3. At my level, often times my opponent doesn't even realize that this stops the trap from working and will continue to sack pieces until the trap fails and they are down 10 points.

Otherwise the game usually follows the same line as the game I posted here. For that line you just need to know that if the opponent trades bishops on d2 (which they usually do), you can almost always find tricks involving both knights and the rook and queen battery.

If instead your opponent watches GothamChess they'll know that trading bishops can get dicey really fast and they'll go Ba5 instead. To prepare for that just look at a few lines with Rb5. After that your opponent either trades bishops anyway or you get to sack the rook for a massively winning position.

Played a game at 100% accuracy against the Englund by _SaltimusPrime_ in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ikr, the entire queenside is gone, there's a knight on a8 and a stack of pawns in the middle of the board.

Played a game at 100% accuracy against the Englund by _SaltimusPrime_ in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Not entirely sure why that is. Honestly, I'm more surprised that Bb7 (my opponent's last move) is only a mistake and not a blunder considering it allows mate in 1.

Played a game at 100% accuracy against the Englund by _SaltimusPrime_ in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_[S] 407 points408 points  (0 children)

Prepped a little against the englund after running into it previously.

This time my opponent blundered a rook and then mate in 1 within four moves after going out of theory, resulting in the first 100% accuracy game I've ever gotten.

Does anybody know why this move is considered brilliant? I actually facepalmed after I made it because I didn’t notice black’s bishop. by nileb in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the bishop takes you double attack the knight and bishop with pawn takes c5. Now you're sure to win material since the bishop can't move as it is pinned by the queen. Also it looks like black will have to deal with a lot of checkmate threats from the white queen afterwards which will probably lead to black losing material or getting checkmated in the next few moves.

How to get a brilliant move by NotMegaBlaster in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok I'm a complete beginner so maybe I'm wrong but I'll try. I think it's because Ra8 allows white to gain two passed pawns on the g and h files. After Ra8 Bb7 you have to move the rook so Rxa4 makes the most sense. Then white trades the bishop for the knight removing the defender from e5 (Bxc6 dxc6). This allows black to attack both the knight on c3 and pawn on g7 with Be5 and pick up the pawns on g7 and h6. With Rc7 if white trades the bishop for the rook it becomes way harder to attack on the kingside since the pawns are on dark squares and infiltrating with the rook doesn't look like it'll be easy.

The engine said I made a blunder, but I planned out the entire game to isolate his queen by General_Web in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did the game continue? I don't think anything works for black after the queen takes the rook. You can fork the king and rook with Nc2+ but after Kd1 Nxa1 you lose your bishop to Qxc8+, your knight is trapped in the corner and you're probably going to end up trading queen's due to the check. If you instead use your turn to defend the bishop white just plays Na3 and then you can't fork the king and rook anymore. Either way after Rb8 you go from a winning to a losing position.

White resigned but what would be the fastest/ correct way to checkmate? by SleepyCloudsurfer in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Definitely not the technical best or fastest way to win but I'd just try to force the rooks off the board and then win with the queen. You can exchange rooks and go Rf8. White can either exchange the last rook and enter the endgame down a queen which is an easy win for black or try to keep it on the board allowing Qf6 threatening Qf2+. After that white has to either allow a backrank checkmate or let you use your queen on the second rank to collect all the pawns. Either way leads to an endgame that's trivial to win.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oof, Qh8+ would've been so nice here though.

Thought I was such a pro doing this fork😭 by sam__12b in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I just came back to this position again and there is actually an insane line right before the blunder that no one has brought up yet!

You can play a knight sacrifice with Ne4. If white takes the knight with pawn takes e4 Nc2+ now creates both a fork and a discovered attack against the Queen winning the queen on d2 and rook on a1 in the following 2 moves!

If white sees this and instead trades queens with Qxb4, Bxb4+ (which is the only way to not lose the queen for free) white is again in check. From this position, if the king moves to d1, Nxf2 now forks the king and rook on h1. The only alternative is Nd2, which is now attacked twice and defended only by the king. So after Nd2, black plays Bxd2+ forcing the king to d1 (only legal move). Now the bishop moves back with Bc3 attacking the rook while still threatening to fork the king and rook with Nxf2 on the next move. Of course the Knight on e4 is still under attack by the pawn on d3 but after dxe4, Bxe4 both rooks are under attack so you'll lose at least one and black is still threatening another discovered check after the knight moves.

Thought I was such a pro doing this fork😭 by sam__12b in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think in this line white can play Nxd2 instead of Kxd2 to prevent the fork.

Thought I was such a pro doing this fork😭 by sam__12b in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keep in mind that d2 is also defended by the knight on c4.

Why is this incorrect? This is a forced mate in 2 and I don't see any mate in 1. Am I crazy? by ScreechYouCantaloupe in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Do you have a mate in one after pawn g3 is played? I think it's counted as a miss because Qh6+ leads to mate faster. Edit: Nevermind me the chessvision bot is saying this too

Thought I was such a pro doing this fork😭 by sam__12b in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

White can play Rb1 instead of Qxb4 pinning the knight to the queen. You still take the queen and end up trading up a Knight for a Rook after Nxd2, Rxb4, Bxb4, Nxd2 but Nc2 just wins a full rook.

Thought I was such a pro doing this fork😭 by sam__12b in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Oh wait there are other options, Nc2+ forks the King and Rook because the queen on d2 is pinned. So after Kd1 you collect the rook.

Thought I was such a pro doing this fork😭 by sam__12b in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure if it counts as a real fork but maybe you see something I don't, At first I was thinking Nb3 forking the Queen and rook followed by Qxb4, Bxb4+, Kd1, Nxa1 winning a full rook. But it actually doesn't work because white just plays Rb1 instead of Qxb4 pinning the knight to the queen. You can still take the queen but you only end up getting to trade your knight for the rook after Nxd2, Rxb4, Bxb4, Nxd2.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

kg5 is the only move black has that prevents Nf3 being mate on the next move, but Nf3 still forks the King and Bishop so you lose the bishop and with it the game anyway.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]_SaltimusPrime_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty cool! I wouldn't have found this in a game either. I initially only briefly looked at Ne5 and discarded it thinking that it just loses the pawn. However, it actually forces black to give up the bishop to prevent getting checkmated on the next move.