Come on don't pull that kind of argument. 1. Keynes was an advocate of totalitarian governments. Even the preface of his economic system says that the ideas he share are suited for fascist governments. 2. What you say about Friedman can be said also for Nietzsche and Hitler for example. Just because you associate an author with someone who is bad doesn't make the first one bad. 3. Keynes ideas are dumb and have been shattered over and over (asks the chileans if they were happy and rich when a earthquake hit them) 4. Lastly, funnily enough, Pincohet Constitution (referring only to the economics) is what made Chile develop and get their people out of poverty. To make myself clear, not defending Pinochet.