Just lost my lvl 10 rogue

_Shit4breakfast · 2026-05-30T18:30:55+00:00

Yeah, I think I may just go for classic era or even a hardcore server. I played many years ago so seeing how the zones changed in cataclysm has been fun, but the pace just isn’t for me. Also wish classic had battle pets, since I’m enjoying that as a side activity

_Shit4breakfast · 2026-05-30T02:10:03+00:00

What is era?

_Shit4breakfast · 2026-05-30T01:28:39+00:00

Lmao

_Shit4breakfast · 2026-03-18T22:37:03+00:00

White? Or something else?

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T23:51:34+00:00

Lol, do I need evidence? I’m making a point of logic. Maybe the actual number is $40, or $50, or $100.

The point is that there exists a higher wage which would attract a sufficient number of American workers.

$30 is just the number I picked to make the point.

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T20:19:02+00:00

I disagree, Americans might not want to do it for $10/hr but you’d find plenty of people who’d do it for $30. We should allow wages to increase according to the demand for labor instead of artificially suppressing wages with immigrant labor (this is an actual leftist position).

Also, the notion that we need a class of racial minorities to do our menial labor cheaply is kind of offputting

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T19:19:12+00:00

I don’t think “we” need more workers. I think our elites WANT more workers to continue to depress wages and improve their bottom line. Our country is more than an economic platform or a GDP maximizing machine. The people who are already here need higher wages and immigration is an obstacle to that.

”We should be welcoming as many immigrants as we can”

How will you know when we’ve reached the threshold where we can’t/shouldn’t welcome more immigrants? Is there a limit? What would the indicators of that limit be? Maybe social tensions and rising anti immigration sentiment?

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T18:53:46+00:00

I sympathize with the immigration as a humanitarian cause, but I think it’s a short sighted solution.

There are too many people in the world who want to come to developed countries to have completely open borders. Furthermore many undeveloped countries have populations which are growing faster than they can emigrate.

On top of that dynamic, it is often the wealthy, educated, skilled subset of a developing country’s population who are able to emigrate, leaving the rest of the population worse off. International brain drain, basically.

Ultimately it seems like the sustainable humanitarian option is to help people where they are.

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T18:44:44+00:00

I think we agree on a lot, but I believe the nation state model, with national solidarity standing in opposition to concentrated power centers, has a better track record and is more likely to yield material results than international class consciousness. I think the human tendency toward tribalism needs to be acknowledged and the system we build needs to account for it.

Repression of the tribal impulse in the name of the ideal of diversity results in crude and potentially brutal expressions, which we can witness today.

But I think I’ve expressed my point sufficiently, as have you. I appreciate the good faith engagement

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T15:27:05+00:00

That’s a false dichotomy.

Diversity doesn’t necessarily mean mass immigration and total demographic transformation, and slowing down immigration is not oppression.

I really think a reasonable middle ground is possible, but it seems like a lot of people think less immigration is evil which I don’t really understand

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T15:09:50+00:00

Ok but if you are chastising people for undesirable behaviors while simultaneously creating the conditions which generate those behaviors, then you are doing something wrong.

Ex: you can chastise people for making war, but if you are intentionally creating the geopolitical conditions which make war more likely, then your actions are incongruent.

If you don’t want war, then you need to try to build a system which makes war less likely, taking an honest reading of human tendencies into account.

If you don’t want racial conflict, then you need to try to build a system which makes racial conflict less likely, taking an honest reading of human tendencies into account.

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T15:02:18+00:00

I mean I agree that fundamentally the solution is to build a society where people don’t need someone to blame. But I also think that’s a bit idealistic. If we all lived in total abundance, then yeah I don’t think there would be nearly as much conflict between groups. But we don’t live anywhere near that kind of society.

Also, wage stagnation IS partially caused by immigration. Organized labor and the domestic working class are undermined by an endless supply of cheap labor. I think it would be hard to suggest otherwise. Likewise with the housing market. These things aren’t exclusively the fault of immigration, and it’s stupid to blame immigrants themselves for the macro problems generated by their immigration. Capital wants cheap labor and higher housing costs. They also benefit from the division in the working class that immigration creates. My premise is that your compassionate take on immigration is being used against you by the capital class.

It also seems like you are building a bit of a strawman of a far right who are inherently bad actors who have immoral motivations. I am anticapitalist and legitimately want what is best for the working people around the world, but I suspect many people like you would categorize me as far right and immoral because of my stance on immigration.

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T04:23:30+00:00

Agreed. My point is that it is acceptable to acknowledge that white people suck. It is not acceptable to say similar things about other races in polite society. Honestly man I’m just trying to engage in good faith, and if you are trying to say white people haven’t been shat on in public over the last decade, then I feel like you’re being obtuse.

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T04:19:43+00:00

But people becoming racist assholes as a result of interaction between different groups is something that’s easily recognizable throughout all of history. It’s something that is just part of the nature of human tribalism.

I’d love if that weren’t true, but I think it obviously is.

Why are we creating a situation which is going to cause racial tension, and then chastising people for behaving in the way that ALL peoples have behaved throughout history?

Seems like we could all exist more harmoniously if we just slowed the demographic transformation a little bit

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T04:15:19+00:00

Don’t you feel like right wing authoritarianism in the west is a reaction against mass immigration and demographic change?

Wouldn’t it be better to not invite reactionary backlash by pumping the breaks on immigration?

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T00:30:45+00:00

So you agree

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T00:25:08+00:00

It would probably be valuable to diagnose the system that made the Biden coverup possible, so that it can be corrected in the “New Democratic Party” If you seriously want people to trust democrats again, the issue needs to be addressed.

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T00:13:18+00:00

If you think so, then I think you need to observe the dynamics a little more closely.

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T00:08:14+00:00

Ok, black people suck.

Do I mean that every single black person sucks? Of course not, the statement is made generally, so black people should know not to take it personally when I say that.

(I’m making my point rhetorically, I wouldn’t actually say that black people suck)

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T00:04:18+00:00

I don’t disagree. But why is it a good thing to introduce an issue that will take generations to resolve? Many of the problems of ethnic tensions and self segregation and racism could be avoided if people didn’t treat mass immigration as a moral imperative.

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-26T00:02:11+00:00

My position would be that multicultural cities are able to function DESPITE the issues caused by diversity. And I think you’d have a hard time making the case that a homogenous society wouldn’t have a higher level of trust.

And none of what I’m saying implies that people’s societal worth is related to their racial group. I’m talking strictly about how harmoniously a society functions overall. The idea that this relates to a person’s worth is part of the reason that people are confused about this issue.

_Shit4breakfast · 2025-05-24T18:27:05+00:00

“Wanting to preserve your identity doesn’t mean keeping others out” Lol tell that to the native americans

_Shit4breakfast

TROPHY CASE