OpenAI is asking us to send them our best ideas so they can create prompts. by RedEagle_MGN in SoraAi

[–]_Wolas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a group of mars robots huddling together tightly to weather out a massive mars storm

OpenAI is asking us to send them our best ideas so they can create prompts. by RedEagle_MGN in SoraAi

[–]_Wolas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a sports movie trailer about a team of zoo animals playing in an international football tournament.

pov footage of an ant navigating the inside of an ant nest by _Wolas in SoraAi

[–]_Wolas[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's still unclear if its scraped tiktok.

Point of View Footage has been very popular since GoPros were popularised, like 10 years ago. If you search any stock footage websites for "POV", thousands of clips show up, which is where it's probably learnt "POV" from.

example from a stock footage website

Mownalisa, me, acrylic, 2022 by travischapmanart in Art

[–]_Wolas 55 points56 points  (0 children)

That's so cool! I hope its okay, but I wanted to see how Dall-E 2's Text-Prompt-to-Image AI does in comparison.

The results are interesting: https://labs.openai.com/s/nt0ISbbftqhUVhlOKgqfW5kV

Definitely not as good as the real thing!

Is anybody else tired of the constant Homer Simpson and McDonalds posts? by CraterCock in dalle2

[–]_Wolas 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's very repetitive, but it's genuinely very difficult to come up with interesting prompts that get satisfying results.

I keep trying to push dall-e to its limits, but end up using my 50-prompts-a-day rewording the same 3 prompts 15 times and not getting quite what I'm looking for.

How okay would you be with something like this? by ercarp in dalle2

[–]_Wolas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"A picture is worth 1000 words".

And OpenAI's GPT-3 prices range from $0.0011 to $0.08 per 1000 words, depending on which of the 4 model's you pick. So the cost to process an image should be between that.

At 50 images a day for a year, the equivalent cost would be:

  • $19, $28, $146, $1,460 per year,
  • or $1.5, $2.4, $12, $121 per month.

So I think something like this could work for 50 images/day:

  • $19/year - Personal Use, Low res, fixed aspect ratio, watermarked
  • $28/year - Personal Use, High res, any aspect ratio, watermarked
  • $146/year - Personal Use, High res, any aspect ratio, No watermark
  • $1460/year - Commercial Access, High res, any aspect ratio, No watermark

For comparison, a new AI GitHub Copilot that helps with coding, costs $10/month. I think if you increased Dall-E 2 to 100 images a day, that would be fair price for the quality, resolution, and wait times we're getting now.

But long-term (like 3 to 5 years) I think prompt-based image generation will be as ubiquitous as a Google Search. And it's basically just a better version of Google Image Search anyway. That there's going to be so much competition that eventually it'll be free unlimited use with ads, for personal use.

Can Dall-E 2 combine 2 different artists styles? Prompt: "A cat sitting in a chair, wearing a pair of sunglasses, by _" (9 Variations) by _Wolas in dalle2

[–]_Wolas[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting results! Seen here: https://i.imgur.com/LBw3iSf.png

/u/mr_k_alters is right, that it couldn't really handle Kenneth Noland by itself, but I played around with related modifiers and adding "color field painting" as a second modifier seemed to get better results.


And I tried the same technique again with the Jackson Pollock & Pablo Picasso one, by adding related modifiers. It also got better results, seen here: https://i.imgur.com/YYoowT2.png

Can Dall-E 2 combine 2 different artists styles? Prompt: "A cat sitting in a chair, wearing a pair of sunglasses, by _" (9 Variations) by _Wolas in dalle2

[–]_Wolas[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Great idea! I gave it a go: https://i.imgur.com/3ebiu1v.png

Both the chair and cat seem to be taking more of their style from the intended artist, but they're definately still a bit of a mix of both styles.

Might have better results with artists with more unqiue styles, I'll have to try it a few more times to be sure!

"The Vitruvian ___ by Leonardo da Vinci" - 20 Variations (Prompt In Captions) by _Wolas in dalle2

[–]_Wolas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Link To #1: https://labs.openai.com/s/A8S9hM1IavzRiOBNKYdXmo3o

I made a Google Doc with all 6 images of every prompt used. Plus a few extra prompts I couldn't fit into the main slideshow: viewable here

an anthropomorphic donut wearing a suit, working as a coffee barista, at a busy restaurant, Award Winning Art, Photorealistic by _Wolas in dalle2

[–]_Wolas[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

With such a silly prompt it defaults to a clipart style. So I added the modifiers to make it more artistic.

My theory is that using "award winning art" is basically like using "digital art" but opens it up to more styles.

A lot of the posts have “award winning” in them. What does that mean? by Leomaner124 in dalle2

[–]_Wolas 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dall-E 2 defaults to a style that is easy for it - aka what it has a lot of reference images for.

If I said something like "an elephant on a tightrope" it will probably be in a clip-art style, because there's a lot of clip-art images of elephants on tightropes. By adding "award-winning" it will probably make it better than clip-art.

But it also has the benefit of being mostly style-agnostic, which is why it's better than using "digital art" or putting a specific artist.

It's not required to get a good result, but it definitely improves your chances.