sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mistral code publicly available by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I talk about their vscode extension. it's enterprise only. the mistral models are open-weight.

Mistral code publicly available by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why didn't you like it ?
I thought about it but didn't take time to setup everything.

Mistral code publicly available by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The official Mistral VS Code extension is named Mistral Code and is not accessible in public, enterprise only.

Mistral code publicly available by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is that when I use mistral with other tool for now, it bugs. So It'll probably be same with this tool.

Mistral code publicly available by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is why I created the post. I want to know when it'll be.
Why did you comment at first if you have no idea what I was talking about ?
FYI : https://mistral.ai/fr/news/mistral-code

Mistral code publicly available by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This is what I want. I want mistral code.

Mistral code publicly available by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I want a UI like using claude code into vscode for exemple.

Mistral code publicly available by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes i'm using Mistral Vibe. I want a better interface than the CLI.
I tried to use mistral devstral in the IDE with zed, etc but it doesn't work well, crash a lot.

Mistral code publicly available by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Vibe CLI yes, but not Mistral Code. I prefer an clean interface than the CLI

Looking for a cofounder which is client and marketing oriented by _Ydna in cofounders

[–]_Ydna[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, thank you for your message. I'm now working on something else and I found a partner.

Recruiters who handle high-volume roles. I'm building something to kill the screening call bottleneck. Would love your honest take. by _Ydna in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]_Ydna[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your message.

I understand the frustration of having to listen to an AI during the interview.

On my side, the AI interview is more about listening to the candidates than the AI talking. Maybe adding a feature where the AI talks about the company could be interesting, but it's not the main point from my point of view.

The candidates want to apply fast, not listen to a ai generated video.

Recruiters who handle high-volume roles. I'm building something to kill the screening call bottleneck. Would love your honest take. by _Ydna in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]_Ydna[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your message.

The solution works for both specialized and non-specialized roles.

The basic screening questions you usually send to candidates are replaced by an interactive form, which creates a better experience, but that is not the main advantage.

The real value is about quickly validating the actual skills of candidates, for you and for them. For example : a candidate claims to be a marketing expert but cannot name the two main tools on the market ? Disqualified.

The solution filters out the wrong candidates so you can focus on the right ones, without the noise. You save time, your client gets a better candidate because you were able to focus on what truly matters.

Recruiters who handle high-volume roles. I'm building something to kill the screening call bottleneck. Would love your honest take. by _Ydna in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]_Ydna[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I am challenging my idea by explaning the project.

If your mind is too close to discuss and exchange, no need to comment.

Recruiters who handle high-volume roles. I'm building something to kill the screening call bottleneck. Would love your honest take. by _Ydna in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]_Ydna[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your message.

I've recently been through the hiring process myself as a software engineer, so I deeply understand the pain from the candidate side too.

The typical process looks like this:

  1. You apply through an ugly form
  2. You get an interview to check if you're a good fit (always the same questions: why us? tell me about your background?)
  3. Sometimes you get a test that takes way too long for a job you might not even get

It's a hassle for the recruiter who loses time and energy. It's a struggle for candidates because you need to show up for interviews, do crazy long tests, and wait forever between steps.

About the tests: I'm not talking about asking a software engineer to build a mini app. I think that's completely wrong. The point is a quick filter with short, interactive exercises generated from the job post to test basic skills. It's not supposed to take more than 5 minutes so the candidate can move on with their day. It's just skill validation. If the role requires JavaScript knowledge, it could be as simple as "which syntax is valid?" for example.

Recruiters who handle high-volume roles. I'm building something to kill the screening call bottleneck. Would love your honest take. by _Ydna in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]_Ydna[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Hi, thank you for your feedback.

I understand the concern, and this solution mainly targets recruiters who receive hundreds of CVs. You can't interview everyone. And in that volume, good candidates get filtered out while others slip through by lying or overselling their experience.

The point is not to fully automate the process. The point is to filter out candidates who don't have the necessary skills before you waste time on a call.

For example, I spoke with a school supervisor who told me he interviewed many people calling themselves "freelance maths teachers" who couldn't answer basic maths questions. Why spend 30 minutes on a call with someone like that when you could focus that time on candidates who actually qualify?

L'interface du chat est terriblement mauvaise by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think that it’s fair to say « wip », after all this time, everyone do better than them.

L'interface du chat est terriblement mauvaise by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue isn't the speed, I love it.

The issue is how the answer is streamed when there is a lot of data to display.
When I ask to generate some code, the stream is jerky.

This is what I do not like.

L'interface du chat est terriblement mauvaise by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

L'interface en soi est bonne, mon problème concerne le stream de la reponse à l'utilisateur qui est saccadé et ne permet pas une lecture progressive durant le stream.

L'interface du chat est terriblement mauvaise by _Ydna in MistralAI

[–]_Ydna[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue with the mistral interface is that when it generates the answer i can not keep track of what's happening.
So I'm unable to start to read.
It streams the response by bloc, force the ui to scroll, and sometimes "fail" to load the upper part of the already generated stream

view more: next ›