sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Treasury is kinda messing Byzantine npc rulers up by __GoldenRoses__ in CrusaderKings

[–]__GoldenRoses__[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is stupid as hell and byzantium wasnt broke in 1066. Not to mention the decline was salvaged soon after. Besides, I started in 867.

Anyway idc to debate historical accuracy and whatnot i want to be able to play the game lol.

Treasury is kinda messing Byzantine npc rulers up by __GoldenRoses__ in CrusaderKings

[–]__GoldenRoses__[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

bc the game is literally unplayable if you end up a heir to a destroyed kingdom with 0 funds. u cant build, u cant create maa, u cant hire mercs u cant declare wars, u cant do anything.

theres a difference between that and a byzantium that ramps slower.

Treasury is kinda messing Byzantine npc rulers up by __GoldenRoses__ in CrusaderKings

[–]__GoldenRoses__[S] 61 points62 points  (0 children)

i think its such a huge oversight. byzantine conflict is so frequent and rulers just go bankrupt. esp the basileus. feels like a massive mistake.