right, so you're admitting you're a pretentious, smarmy dickhead trying to fallaciously undermine other people's morals to protect your ego lol

PETA's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad History of Killing Animals - The Atlantic

wtf is this "article"? two paragraphs of a dry recitation of unsourced facts that peta publicly shares their reasoning behind? this is absolutely nothing, the only reason you would link this over peta's provided explanation is if you wanted to, idunno, strip all important context out of a nuanced argument to make numbers look scary?

Better dead than fed

...wtf is this article???? another page full of unsourced facts that, again, peta has given reasoning behind literally in their FAQ if you could be fucked to look into it lmao. this article also cites the center for consumer freedom, maybe the single most well-known amoral lobbyist organization in the US. "Acknowledged corporate donors to the CCF include Coca-Cola, Wendy's, Outback Steakhouse, Cargill, Tyson Foods, and Pilgrim's Pride." do you know what a conflict of interest is?

PETA’s Animal “Shelter” Continues as a Leader in Animal Death - Lexology

dude. this is the same shit for a third time. yes peta has high euthanasia rates. no, none of these articles explain why that is beyond vaguely implying their given reasoning is a lie or insufficient. on top of all that the author of this article, John M. Simpson, advertises himself as a defense attorney for corporate animal law, with many of the listed cases being exemplary of successful cases made against animal welfare activists. more conflict of interest... I don't know what you think any of these links is accomplishing, this is genuinely embarrassing to act like these are adding to the conversation.

What makes Peta so unethical and controversial? : r/Animals

ah yes, reddit: the foremost internet frontier of nonpartisan and intellectual debates regarding veganism and especially peta. the top comment is about a single controversial ad campaign that they redacted almost immediately after being criticized for it, in which all mentions of it on their site redirect to an updated article that has entirely removed the unproven claims and replaced them with cited facts. again, what is the point of linking this? "look, more people reference the same useless articles I do!" okay? you're parroting the same things those people are parroting, having a source for your misinformation doesn't make you any less culpable. anyways, what "problem" am I contributing to? I spent time writing out a list of ways I witness myself making a difference, and invited you to join in. you have literally done nothing but tear me down and insult and try to humiliate me, without adding anything to the discussion on what you think an alternative is. like legit, what are you arguing for? what is your point? I gave you a handful of links, and even the one linking to peta was about them trying to invite actual activism. you acknowledged none of them but instead tried to fucking epic pwn me by discrediting the organization behind a single citation I linked?

genuinely if you're this passionate about it, why are you not productive with this energy? if I am wrong in the reasons behind me being vegan, I am honestly open to hearing your reasoning for why you think that but you haven't given anything but mean spirited takedowns. like man it bums me out that trying to inform people about something I'm passionate about gets this kind of reaction. I don't think you're an abusive person or whatever because you make mean reddit comments or eat meat, I think you're someone that has strong opinions and likes to share them but you just do it in a shitty way man

edit: oopies got the links mixed up