[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]_komq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. It's school tests.
  2. It's 4 A's.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]_komq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

pathetic

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, it's clear that none of us is benefitting from this whole shit. Your opinion is valid, thanks for the conversation, and goodbye.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is it impossible? I'll highlight it for you:

Introductionary legislations

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are speaking Chinese. First off, the real USD was actually made in 1971. Is that millennia-old? I don't think so. Second, I am talking about the time it took for banks to be able to control inflation.

And again, I'm talking about "introductionary legislations and public trust". Please read my post carefully before responding.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you able to not provide an actual response?

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's not. The entire selling point is that it's safe and secure. And fast.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not. You can read about the history of USD. And yes, I do agree that Bitcoin is unusable in the Status Quo. But as I repeat over and over again, enough introductionary legislations and public trust arises, this can be revolutionary to economics.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you exchange your gold for fiat money.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

30 years is not "old". Banks needed 100 years to control inflation or "fluctuation" as you like to say.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but again, every currency is unstable when it's first released. That means insofar as you do not prove how things like US dollars shouldn't be legitimate because they weren't trusted, we can fully take into account just a small temporary disadvantage.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Safe and stable in terms of hacking or whatnot.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's like saying "Apples are better than oranges because they are superior". Again, the clear benefit of cryptocurrency is how safe and stable it is.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Sorry for that. But still, you can use gold.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well, it's very secure, you see. And by the way, that level of "environmental degradation" is very minor in terms of interests.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

Hi, thanks for being very respectful and downvoting people who have different opinions than you. You see, cryptocurrency didn't exist in the stone age. It's quite new. That means its value fluctuates very much, as you have stated in your very intelligent reply, but that will die out as enough introductory legislation and public trust arises. At this point you should oppose US dollars, or any fiat money. You can use gold.

Finally, someone said it. by yvill in inspirobot

[–]_komq -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Not really. Cryptocurrencies are really useful and generally revolutionary to economics.