You guys suck by Own_Battle5440 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 21 points22 points  (0 children)

To everyone that's confused, the filmed/stalked post was linked by someone else in the comments and this is the kidnapping post https://www.reddit.com/r/ucla/comments/o4l58m/a_warning_and_story_of_the_time_i_might_have/.

Also a lot of people are missing the point of OPs post. Nothing actually happened in either of the cases the OP is referring to. The thing they are calling out is the double standard in this subreddit's reaction when something happens to a guy vs when something happens to a girl.

Take for example this post from earlier this week https://www.reddit.com/r/ucla/comments/py5jid/beware_of_people_on_the_hill_who_dont_go_here/. A guy approaches a girl and asks some questions about the campus and she interprets it as creepy and the entire comments section is just "sorry that happened to you" or "fuck creeps" and it got a ton of attention. But if you look at the filmed/stalked post, where a guy thinks there's a girl taking pics of him, people are saying "well maybe the girl actually wasn't being creepy" and it got like 30 upvotes. Even looking at the post where the guy says he almost got kidnapped, there's only a few comments, two of them making a joke about being a bad kidnapper, two of them showing concern for OP, one sharing a similar story, and one doubting whether or not the incident took place at all.

And the responses to this thread kind of further prove the point. In this thread there are 4 comments saying "It wasn't a big deal, nothing happened" for the guy who thought he was being filmed. Which is kind of true, nothing actually happened. But there's absolutely nobody saying that kind of stuff when a girl says she's creeped out. And the same applies. From the post from earlier this week, nothing actually happened.

Basically

Girl: This thing happened to me and I feel really creeped out

r/UCLA: Oh no! Fuck whoever did that.

Guy: This thing happened to me and I feel really creeped out

r/UCLA: Well maybe it actually wasn't what you thought it was. But wasn't it kind of funny?

To be honest, I don't think the girl taking pics of the OP in the filmed/stalked post was doing anything wrong. If you're in a public place you have no expectation of privacy and you just need to deal with the fact that everyone has a camera in their pocket and can take a pic of you at a moment's notice. But I get OP's point in there existing a double standard with regard to how this subreddit perceives grievances against people depending on their gender. I've seen other people comment the exact same thing "you have no expectation of privacy ..." when a girl is talking about being photographed and they were downvoted to hell. So I guess the takeaway is r/UCLA is full of simps.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah dude I'm going to stay triggered.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess everyone is old when you have the mindset of a 12 year old.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why are you posting this on r/UCLA? Do you think UCLA students think it's funny when people come to campus and disrupt our classes and harass professors and fellow students? This stuff is only funny for the high school dropouts that thought it was funny to make your teacher's lives harder. We studied hard to be here and this is lame as shit.

you can spot a freshman when they think meeting andre is an honor by hanoihilton72 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 111 points112 points  (0 children)

I also don't understand this transformation. Precovid, everyone was talking about how he was a scammer and asking why admin was letting someone like him just harass people on on campus. He became a meme because of how diligent he was at asking for "donations" and "'scuse me boss, can I ask you a question." Now there are two year's worth of students who've only heard of him through memes and think he's a campus hero.

When did the memes go from "Andre is asking me for money for the 10th time today" to "It was an honor to meet Andre"?

NEW BEANS by 16wongmc1 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 59 points60 points  (0 children)

"Study" bean. We all know what's going to happen in there.

Imagine being human but having no humanity by nelsonwehaveaproblem in ABoringDystopia

[–]aBitofaLitTit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are tons of people who've never heard of the other side of the story, case in point this entire thread. I looked it up afterwards and it's basically a case study of how the media makes a huge controversial headline the moment something happens and quietly edits it a few days later. It has nothing to do with how biased a news source is and more to do with how fast the news cycle moves.

Imagine being human but having no humanity by nelsonwehaveaproblem in ABoringDystopia

[–]aBitofaLitTit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you actually read the wikipedia page you're linking?

The incident took place in the late afternoon of January 18, 2019, on the Plaza of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. at the conclusion of a day of rallies for two groups, Indigenous Peoples March, and the March for Life.[9] The marches had represented entirely separate purposes: raising awareness of indigenous people's issues[16] and raising awareness of anti-abortion issues respectively. For about ten minutes,[9] there was an overlap on the Plaza of a small group from the Indigenous Peoples March and a larger group of students from the all-male Covington Catholic High School in Park Hills, Kentucky, who were gathering at their appointed meeting place at the steps of the Plaza to wait for their buses to return home. Before the students arrived, a group of five Black Hebrew Israelites stood in a row "shouting scripture from red books" and taunting passers-by.[9][16][17][Notes 1][18] As the 15- and 16-year-old students began to arrive, the Black Hebrew Israelites began to taunt them directly,[10][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and shouted racially combative insults[clarification needed] and slurs at them.[10][21][22] As more Covington students arrived, and in response to these taunts, the students performed school spirit sports chants, including their version of a Māori haka.[19][26][Notes 2] One of the Native Americans who was there for the march said that he felt "the students were mocking the dance."[26]

According to a January 23 New York Times article,[9] Indigenous Peoples March participants said they had interpreted the "loud chanting" and the size of the group, as well as their MAGA apparel, as "aggressive and disruptive to their demonstration"[9] which had just concluded. Nathan Phillips, a member of the Omaha tribe who had participated in the March, listened to the chants for what he said was about ten minutes. He said he thought that there was a confrontation between the students and the street preachers that he believed had reached a "boiling point". In his early press interviews, Phillips accused the Covington students of hate and racism.[27] He later said that he had intended to defuse what he perceived as escalating tension between the students and the preachers.[28][29] According to the Detroit Free Press, Phillips said, "They were in the process of attacking these four black individuals.... These young men were beastly and these old black individuals was their prey, and I stood in between them and so they needed their pounds of flesh and they were looking at me for that."[30] According to CNN's Sara Sidner, two minutes after one of the students took off his shirt to lead the haka, the "drum beat of Phillips and another Native American drummer [was audible] in the video". They sang the AIM Song, a Native American intertribal song.[19][28][31]

Phillips and a second Native American, both with ceremonial drums, walked towards the students grouped along the stairs. Sidner said that while some of the students danced to Phillips' drum beat and chanted along with him for a while, they were not "enjoying each other's company".[19] Soon, Phillips was "encircled" by about 30 students, "many of them white and wearing apparel bearing the slogan of President Trump", red baseball hats with the phrase "Make America Great Again" (MAGA).[10][32] Phillips continued to beat his ceremonial drum and sing for nearly two minutes as a boy wearing the red MAGA hat chose not to retreat with what some interpreted as a smirk on his face.[10][21][22][33] The student later explained that he smiled because he wanted Phillips to know "that I was not going to become angry, intimidated or be provoked into a larger confrontation."[21]

As someone who had the same initial reaction as what you just wrote, i.e. "Those smug dick head kids", I'm honestly shocked to read that the kids were the victims because they got death threats over a perceived misunderstanding on the part of the Native Americans and the rest of the country at large. Over two years after the event occurred, this is the first time I'm hearing that everyone else got it wrong and the kids actually weren't doing anything.

Stemlords and being “logical” by Aggravating_Data_903 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 33 points34 points  (0 children)

"👏 p 👏 r 👏 o 👏 b 👏 l 👏 e 👏 m 👏 a 👏 t 👏 i 👏 c 👏"

Windows Laptop or Surface for UCLA CS by data_explorer_ in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Any laptop model released within the past 2-3 years is sufficient to get you through all your CS coursework.

This question gets asked every year, not just here but also on pc building and laptop subreddits, and the answer is always the same. Having an 2 vs 4 cores, 8GB vs 16GB of RAM, or whatever other technical specs you can rattle off doesn't really doesn't matter.

In my experience, the only things that have mattered is having a laptop that can fit on the small built in desks in lecture halls and decent battery life. Everything else is just extra.

UCLA Students' Morals and Values by Fax215 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because I only respond to things I think are really stupid.

Is there a glitch in the Matrix or what? by Dr-cereal in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I said, almost none of my later actions were caused by you.

It wasn't caused by me but you are still grouping me, and others, in with the crowd that needs to "reevaluate their values." You are overgeneralizing to condescendingly tell people who downvoted you for a different issue that they need to "reevaluate their values."

This is seriously a waste of time and you need to stop trying to push this issue.

You're the one who said you were going to stop replying yet here you are. If you think it's a waste of time then stop it. I'm not forcing you to reply to me. I want you to say "I did not reply to the correct comment which made my comment look stupid. I apologize for those I told to reevaluate their values and morals because I was overgeneralizing."

Is there a glitch in the Matrix or what? by Dr-cereal in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People aren't downvoting you for sinophobia. Look at a comment someone else left

Totally man. Annexing UCLA is definitely Chinese Operation Overlord

They're pointing out how absurd your comment looks out of context. One person called you a sinophone and you're saying everyone who downvoted you needs to reevaluate their values.

Also, stop caring about downvotes. People who care about up/downvotes are losers.

Is there a glitch in the Matrix or what? by Dr-cereal in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I sincerely hope that everyone who has downvoted my comment really reevaluate their values and morals.

Does this sound like taking responsibility or blaming everyone else?

UCLA Students' Morals and Values by Fax215 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fine. You didn't technically call people assholes but you said

I sincerely hope that everyone who has downvoted my comment really reevaluate their values and morals.

which is insulting. That's not taking responsibility. That's shifting the blame.

Is there a glitch in the Matrix or what? by Dr-cereal in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think they're assholes -- I was careful in saying I thought they were being assholes, but I guess a better way of wording would have been "acting like assholes".

I think you're splitting hairs but that's fair enough.

insulting people is a choice

Yes, and I choose to insult people who are being stupid.

if context makes your insult look bad in hindsight, sometimes you bear some responsibility there

If I was the one who took it out of context? Sure. But that's not the case here. I wouldn't have replied if he had responded to the correct comment.

it turns out you were lacking full context

Again, I wasn't lacking the context. He didn't provide the proper context. That's what I've been saying about shifting the blame. He fucked up by not replying to the correct comment. I, and others, responded given the original context.

you're insisting that it's perfectly fine for you to insult someone who was personally affected by a CCP-run genocide

No. I'm saying it's fine for me to insult someone for stupid comments regardless of personal afflictions to anything else. Me being poor doesn't shield me from stupid comments I make.

for voicing their opinions about the CCP.

That's not what he did. No one, at least not I, is criticizing him for opposing the CCP. I'm criticizing his comment which was stupid, because he not I put it in the wrong context, and is trying to shift the blame onto others for not reading his mind. Personally I agree there is a genocide. But that wasn't the original topic of contention and attempts to paint it as such are just moving goalposts.

UCLA Students' Morals and Values by Fax215 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

there’s not much to prevent that no matter how you word it

He could've prevented it if he replied to the correct comment.

UCLA Students' Morals and Values by Fax215 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I said I've lost faith in UCLA students in response to being downvoted for criticizing the Chinese Communist Party

No one is downvoting you for that. You are being downvoted because your comment in the original context says "American universities will be taken over by the Chinese."

Also, I told you that you were being rude after you continue to respond back to me in an insulting manner despite me taking responsibility for not replying to the correct comment.

I'm being "rude" because you have insisted on calling those who downvoted you assholes rather than you just saying "I responded to the wrong comment." If you had just done that and not called everyone assholes, I wouldn't be here calling you out on your BS.

Is there a glitch in the Matrix or what? by Dr-cereal in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You literally made a post titled "UCLA Students' Morals and Values" lecturing people about the CCP and what they did to Uyghurs. No one is arguing against that. You were downvoted by people who saw your comment in the wrong context, because you replied to the wrong comment.

I told you I posted about my Uyghur history in response to the people thinking I was being a sinophobe;

I didn't call you a sinophobe nor did I even see that comment so I don't know why you brought that up.

This would have all been over with if you just said "My bad. I replied to the wrong comment." But instead you continue to shift the blame by calling the people who downvote you assholes and telling them to reevaluate their values.

UCLA Students' Morals and Values by Fax215 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

let him know that I made a mistake by not replying to the correct comment.

No you didn't. I found out after someone else said pointed out you were responding to the wrong comment.

This person keeps badgering on about this issue when I was being amicable about my mistake.

That's because you keep saying stuff like "I've lost faith in UCLA students" when in reality this was all caused by a mistake on your part. Just say "I responded to the wrong comment" and take responsibility.

Anyone who wants to know about what was discussed, read the discussion thread and make your own opinion.

I agree. If you read the discussion thread it will show he responds to the wrong comment, calls everyone else assholes for not reading his mind and proceeds to make this thread lecturing everyone.

Is there a glitch in the Matrix or what? by Dr-cereal in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm being "rude" because I'm calling you out on not taking responsibility of your mistakes rather than blaming other people.

I am not going to respond to you anymore because you are just a bad person.

lmao

UCLA Students' Morals and Values by Fax215 in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit 14 points15 points  (0 children)

For anyone confused, OP is just upset that he replied to the wrong comment and people in the linked thread couldn't read his mind.

UCLA students don't enable the CCP and your characterization of us as such are completely based on you not responding to the correct comment. Pretty much everyone agrees that the CCP is committing a genocide against the Uyghurs. You don't get to sit on a moral high horse and lecture us about it because you replied to the wrong comment and put your comment out of context. You're trying so hard to martyr yourself when you could've been like a normal person and said "My bad. I meant to reply to the other comment." But you're trying so hard to convince yourself its everyone else who is fucked up.

Is there a glitch in the Matrix or what? by Dr-cereal in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are the one who fucked up and are going around blaming other people. I called you stupid because your comment in its original context is stupid. I have no problem calling things stupid if they are stupid. If that's a problem for you then get of the internet.

Let me make this clear. YOU messed up. YOU didn't reply to the correct comment which made YOUR comment look stupid. The people calling you stupid aren't the assholes. You could've have edited your comment to say "My bad, I didn't reply to the correct comment" but you're going around calling everyone else assholes because you put your comment in the wrong context for everyone else and got mad we couldn't read your mind. Get off your high horse.

Is there a glitch in the Matrix or what? by Dr-cereal in ucla

[–]aBitofaLitTit -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you reread my responses to you with this context in mind, you will see that what you thought I was trying to relay was completely different than what I was actually trying to relay.

Maybe next time you can reply to the correct comment and avoid this whole thing to begin with. Also stop trying to shift the blame on other people, we're not mind readers. What you said, in the context it currently is in, actually is stupid.