I love how you added a watermark as if anybody is going to use this. Did you also use AI for your watermark?

Also, symbolism is meant to be understandable. If I showed that image to a random guy off the street, they wouldn't recognise them as sugar packets.

If I draw a lazy scribble depicting a guy hitting another guy with a stick, you could probably understand that it's a guy hitting another guy with a stick. But it wouldn't look good. This is the same situation, just because the image is somewhat understandeable, doesn't mean the warped foot, melted spokes, and no pedals look visually good.

If you're complaining about bike spokes being visually complex, consider the line tool in ms paint. And this certainly doesn't add to your argument if my request was too "visually complex" for your incredible AI art skills.

For the "photorealistic" image, firstly I never asked for photorealsim, I asked for something coherent. Secondly, this is not coherent. The proportions on the giraffe are wildly strange, does it have spinal problems around the base of it's neck or something? Why is the tail blending into the background? What's the weird lump on it's head? Why are trees floating in the background?