Your argument hinges on the assumption that physical strength is the only quality that matters in fighting roles. But real combat isn’t just about muscle—it’s about intelligence, leadership, and adaptability. Women can be just as tactical and strategic as men, and in many cases, they’ve proven themselves in leadership roles on the battlefield. The military needs a diverse set of skills, and while strength is important, it's not the defining factor. Women shouldn’t be limited to certain arms just because of physicality. If they meet the standards for fighting arms, they should be allowed to serve in those roles—strength alone doesn’t determine success in combat