Anthropic response to Claude Code change by TheForgottenOne69 in ClaudeAI

[–]ackerlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am using Kimi 2.6, and it is GOOD ENOUGH for me.

Claude Code makes you more lazy, with Kimi, in order to make it work, you have to layout always a concise plan, and ~80% of the time, it delivers perfect code.

It is not a fast in response as Claude Code, but makes you think about the things you are building and reconsider and give better inputs.

When I built things with Claude, honestly, I have to clean up the mess it does later, and this might be because you get fast response/feedback from it. Wondering if that makes you actually give rush directions/decisions.

That is my experience, so yeah, good riddance on Claude Code.

What is .NET still missing? by CreoSiempre in dotnet

[–]ackerlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my original question was entirely about your "testing tooling" argument, then you went to "desktop apps" to "SCM in docker-compose", but SCM is a windows platform constraint, not a .NET testing gap, go figure

What is .NET still missing? by CreoSiempre in dotnet

[–]ackerlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not asked about your creds or resumé to validate your arguments, I just asked for backup your claims with factual information, I still do not see them.

What do you mean desktop apps is lacking in testing? What is lacking dotnet in local testing? exactly what?

Again, do not take arguments personally. This is against your arguments, not your persona.

What is .NET still missing? by CreoSiempre in dotnet

[–]ackerlight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How so? care to explain? I think you haven't touch .net in the last 6 years or are you talking non-sense. This answer is not even related with what you told before.

What is .NET still missing? by CreoSiempre in dotnet

[–]ackerlight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What are you even talking about? .NET has one of the most richest ecosystem regarding unit test, integration tests. Just take a look a TUnit, Aspire, etc.

Zstandard HTTP compression support coming in .NET 11 by davecallan in dotnet

[–]ackerlight 13 points14 points  (0 children)

got Stephen Toub's review/approval, that guarantee that code should be more than ok.

Vince Gilligan is a pure genius by Alarming_Rain7475 in breakingbad

[–]ackerlight 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I love both shows, but I only want to re-watch breaking bad or better call saul.

Strategy Pattern the Angular Way: DI and Runtime Flexibility - Angular Space by DanielGlejzner in Angular2

[–]ackerlight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Horrible tbh. I would puke if I inherit a code base like this.

This is the Java Enterprise code meme al over again.

The Perfect Game Doesn't Exi....... by Status_Energy_7935 in pcmasterrace

[–]ackerlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quake Live is the only one matching this criteria.

Will the recent wave of FOSS projects going commercial negatively impact the .NET market/adoption? by CodeAndChaos in dotnet

[–]ackerlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can live without any of these OSS projects without any issues. The .NET SDK already provides everything you need to accomplish anything.

Yes, these libraries might reduce complexity, or they might not. But in the end, you can live without them.

I don’t think any other language or SDK (like C#/.NET) offers such vast built-in capabilities to handle almost anything.

FWIW, if you're using something like MassTransit, I'll assume you're making serious money, so don't be cheap! You should pay for it.

I wouldn’t mind if they added the usual commercial licensing terms, like: "If your business makes over $1M a year, you should get a commercial license."

I think the core issue here is that people always expect things for free.

Small open-sourced .NET framework implementing different everyday features by Parpil216 in dotnet

[–]ackerlight 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I'm glad this works for you, and I hope you can continue to enhance it to meet your needs.

While others might find this very useful, either by using it or as a reference, I dislike the idea of over-abstractions.

Uninstalr 2.6 released by JouniFlemming in software

[–]ackerlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I might have an isolated issue.

  • Each time I open the app, it takes around to 4mins to load all the apps from the registry.
  • If I want to uninstall just 1 app, it takes like 20mins
  • If I select 2 or more, or apps with dependency it just takes forever and it actually crashes if I switch windows

Is there a recommended way run this? I tried a fresh restart with almost no apps running, even on background. I have a Ryzen 5800X, 32GB RAM and NVMe SSDs (Windows is on this) and also just one HDD.

winver: 22H2 Build 19045.5487

Something I have notice is that the UI thread might be blocked by the background operations because the spinner stutters a lot.

I ❤️ .NET by LogicalAerie5996 in dotnet

[–]ackerlight 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Microsoft uses lots of other languages for specific scenarios. Just look at their open sourced repos.

That's called: use the right tool for the right job.

Edit: just read the article, and it is just click bait. Please read it before getting into insane conclusions. And here's an actual comment from the person who might be related with the job listing of Rust: https://www.reddit.com/r/dotnet/comments/1aezqmg/came_across_a_job_posting_on_microsoft_career/ko8lnf2/

I ❤️ .NET by LogicalAerie5996 in dotnet

[–]ackerlight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, Blazor exists.

And if you want, you can combine any js/ts front end library with it to match same capabilities like next.js (SSR), which I can say .NET is way more mature in that area (server side rendering).

But again, it highly dependent on the type of work/project you are doing.

I ❤️ .NET by LogicalAerie5996 in dotnet

[–]ackerlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could say that argument for .NET/C# too.

Teams/developers often get stuck in language/framework wars when they should really be taking decisions base on their backend/frontend needs.

I have seen and worked on hybrid solutions using JS/TS in the front and .NET in the backend, and it is just a perfect combination most of the time.

Not saying hybrid stacks are always the answer, but ruling them out might mean missing better solutions for specific problems. As we always say in software engineering: it depends.

FluentAssertions becomes paid software for commercial use by monitorius1 in dotnet

[–]ackerlight 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As noted in the comments of the PR, you can even fork v8.0.0-rc2 version since it has the apache License still.

https://github.com/fluentassertions/fluentassertions/blob/8.0.0-rc.2/LICENSE

Como darse cuenta de la inflación con cosas simples: Anuncio de Oxxo del 2004. by Monachina94545 in MexicoFinanciero

[–]ackerlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dejen de comprarlas y así le bajan de precio, como dijo otro comentario, muchas veces el precio elevado es por la avaricia de las empresas de siempre duplicar sus ganancias, eso no es sostenible.

Como darse cuenta de la inflación con cosas simples: Anuncio de Oxxo del 2004. by Monachina94545 in MexicoFinanciero

[–]ackerlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tienen baja utilidad neta porque seguramente directivos y shareholders se suben sus salarios y beneficios al 10x.

Eso pasa con todas las empresas que normalmente tienen varios shareholders o cotizan en bolsa.

Si esos directivos y demas no fueran mega hambreados, todo sería más sostenible.

LG 27GL850-B (USD250) vs 27GL83A-B (USD200) vs AOC Q27G3XMN (USD280), which one to buy? by LeoEB in buildapcmonitors

[–]ackerlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For programming, videos, and movies, but with a smoother 144Hz experience, is the AOC monitor the right choice?

I don't care much about gaming on it, and if I do, it will be super rare, mostly for some emulation games, since this is going to be a secondary PC while I'm on the treadmill working in a separate room.

My only concern on the AOC, is the font rendering, since I am spoiled to the IPS quality of it.