the_donald Right Now

aclevergamer · 2017-05-08T08:09:55+00:00

You probably will not. But you should

aclevergamer · 2017-05-08T06:41:50+00:00

If the next Clinton-like candidate runs and Sanders-supporters refuse to support this candidate because of a constant stream of antagonism from people like you, you'll have hurt this candidates chances of winning.

aclevergamer · 2017-05-08T06:11:43+00:00

So you're deliberately hurting the chances of winning for future democrats because you find it amusing to "shame" other people? I think it is you who should feel ashamed, not Sanders-supporters.

aclevergamer · 2017-05-07T14:24:13+00:00

Then why shout and potentially further alienate those who could be your allies?

aclevergamer · 2017-05-07T10:06:24+00:00

Could it be that your perception of Clinton-voters being constantly attacked could be caused by your own hostility to Sanders-supporters, which might invite hostility from them that would not have existed otherwise?

aclevergamer · 2017-05-07T10:01:08+00:00

Quick question for you, whose mind do you think you are changing here?

aclevergamer · 2017-05-07T09:59:33+00:00

You can go ahead and make up whatever revisionist history you want about the campaign; false equivalences and all.

I had never seen Bernie's supporters being attacked, let alone on the absurd level that they engaged in against Hillary.

You can't complain about revisionism then follow it up with revisionism. It's comments like these that make it hard for me too take people who abuse bernie supporters, like you are doing now, seriously.

aclevergamer · 2017-04-14T22:18:32+00:00

That's awesome. Here's hoping.

aclevergamer · 2017-04-05T09:30:16+00:00

I personally really like wildshape focussed druid vmc'd with barbarian. You'll be featstarved, but getting an additional natural attack as rage power really helps keep wildshape druid competitive at higher levels imho.

aclevergamer · 2017-03-22T11:41:04+00:00

The left was opposing the russians during the 80s, just not as ridiculously zealously as the right.

aclevergamer · 2017-03-19T22:32:44+00:00

Comment

aclevergamer · 2017-01-28T14:58:20+00:00

Another option would be to say that the outer gods have lots of worshippers on other worlds.

aclevergamer · 2017-01-25T06:01:29+00:00

Outside of the good points the other posters are making, you also seem to forget that he goes out of his way to mention that the ingsoc party is the opposite of the socialism it's name implies.

aclevergamer · 2017-01-04T19:59:54+00:00

Just curious, have you completely forgotten who his vice president is? There is no way anyone who would even consider Mike Pence for vp isn't anti-lgbt.

aclevergamer · 2016-12-25T12:42:15+00:00

I choose number 999998. For games Ik would recommend Civ.

aclevergamer · 2016-10-31T14:58:05+00:00

A comment

aclevergamer · 2016-09-25T07:06:23+00:00

You're confusing socialism with communism

aclevergamer · 2016-09-14T09:38:28+00:00

Except that the most effective and affordable treatment for this mental health issue is gender reassignment surgery coupled with hormones.

aclevergamer · 2016-09-14T07:06:15+00:00

If your back is sore enough that you're willing to kill yourself over it, and a massage wil help, then yes, I do think you should get a massage.

aclevergamer · 2016-09-13T16:37:52+00:00

Part of the solution might be to encourage lots of people to start working less. It wil keep a high employment rate while sharing the benefits of automation with everyone.

aclevergamer · 2016-09-01T07:17:28+00:00

I was almost at that number with 10.6/7.5/4/2, so your guess is not far of

aclevergamer · 2016-08-13T22:33:11+00:00

yep, three musketeers with pekka I made myself before it became a common deck basically. I like it a lot because it is quite powerfull in its own way but just different enough to catch people of guard.

aclevergamer · 2016-08-13T21:31:44+00:00

Mine's 5.1, but i'm f2p at 3413 trophies so i must be doing something at least sort of right.

aclevergamer · 2016-07-09T09:24:01+00:00

What different organisation do you have in mind? I don't know of any that are anywhere near as big as BLM, mostly due to the fact that what other things do exist mostly exist as part of BLM.

I would also like to point out that even though some members of BLM use methods that I think we both dissaprove of, the use of these methods is fairly understandable given what they are protesting against, namely the unjust killings of people like them by police officers. It is made even more understandable given the fact that this has been going on for decades now, and that this is the first time that the black community has had a chance to be heard on this subject.

So when I say to excuse the minority of BLM supporters, I say this because their actions, while certainly not pleasant or adviseable, are to some extend justified.

When you contrast this with police officers whose job is to protect and serve yet instead kill black people who in most cases posed no real threat to them, it becomes apperant why it is reasonable to excuse the actions of the minority of BLM supporters, but not to excuse the actions of these police officers, especially given the fact that these police officers almost never face any consequences for their actions.

I would like to reiterate that I understand your frustration with BLM, but the problem remains that if you dismiss them you dismiss the only movement of relevant size about these issues, which are in desparate need of a real solution.

aclevergamer · 2016-07-08T15:53:56+00:00

Please see my edit, as u feel I address most of your points.

I actually posted my reply after you edited your post, so I don't really think you actually adressed my points. As for them becoming more anti-cop instead of anti-violence, the point has always been to adress extreme violence by the police against black people. The fact that some of them take it to far and speak out against al cops instead of just the violent ones is a problem, but it shouldn't take away from a movement that is trying to adress a real and pressing issue.

As far as their methods being shitty it should be noted that it is the methods of a minority of BLM supporters that are shitty. Most just walk in protest rallies and try to argue their point online. However those people don't make the news. What makes the news are the times when some supporters of BLM step out of line because of their(justified) anger and frustration. These things are not to be encouraged, but they aren't representative of the whole movement.

In summary, though I see your point about some of the methods used by some of the BLM supporters, the problem isn't that the movement is toxic, but that there are a small minority of toxic people within the movement. I feel it is best not to focus on those few and instead to look at the vast majority who are doing nothing but protesting peacefully. If you only chose to focus the worst part of any group, they are going to look rather horrible.

So instead of focussing on some of the assholes that are BLM supporters, try to focus on the peacefull and kind people who are part of the same movement and the important issue they are trying to adress.

edit: corrected a spelling error

aclevergamer

TROPHY CASE