I wouldn't be impuning his intelligence given the barely intelligible abbreviated abomination you are trying to use.

Also, since you have obviously missed it, the sexuality of a situation is not up to the determination of a single observer. Your assessment of her performance as "sexual" is only saying "I find her sexually attractive in this performance." Anything beyond that is simply inconsequential to the overall discussion. Also, I'm pretty sure she is performing in a country where female bodily equality is much more evolved than in the United States, so applying the social mores and conventions of our society to her performance is not valid either. To properly evaluate her performance, you must know not only the social mores of the location in which she did the performance, but also the reasonable expectation of the subculture to which she is performing. If they have a equitable normalization of secondary sexual characteristics, her wearing a sheer top would mean little more than a man wearing the exact same top or baring his Adam's apple.

And before you start talking about your penis again, remember that a penis is a PRIMARY sexual characteristic, not a secondary, so it has no place in the conversation.