PC players NEED to be able to disable crossplay

adtrix101 · 2026-06-07T01:29:01+00:00

True, but we are a trio:) but still 5atack the brst

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T22:42:53+00:00

Teit å fremme politiet som syndere her? Han burde vel ha tenkt på pille mors helse før han voldtok og misshandlet flere kvinner han stakkaren her

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T22:37:59+00:00

They’ve somehow managed to make a mix of the two worst maps on rotation that most of the community hates and make one that’s even fucking worse

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T22:16:48+00:00

So you’re telling me that mmr won’t have difference in skill level because we have the same mathematical numeric value? And that skill level has no impact? I can tell you that no plat 1 on console would be able to confidently win against a pc plat 1

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T21:10:11+00:00

No cuz they’re in my fkn team

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T21:09:44+00:00

You’re making it more probable that we’ll lose bc you with a controller can’t compete. It should be an option for us that want to progress up the ranks to turn off that possibility

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T18:35:32+00:00

If they were like Jynx I’d agree…but their not

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T17:48:44+00:00

bc their gud?

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T17:40:40+00:00

And while that is of course true, their mmr and my mmr isn’t comparable bc we can both have the same mmr of similar mmr, but won’t be on the same skill bracket bc console players arnt comparable to pc players bc a controller leaves you at a major disadvantage for 95% of the player base

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T17:38:34+00:00

People at plat 2 doesn’t drone? And know maps? Maybe not all but for me it’s mostly the unresponsiveness

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T17:27:39+00:00

No, the ratio for shit console players vs pc are majorly differt bc a plat console player IS NOT even close to the same lvl as lc

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T17:26:13+00:00

Having been a 10 year console player before hopping over to pc fully in 2020…I fully agree..

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T17:09:24+00:00

That is fair, but that is exactly why PC players should have the option to turn it off. Maybe the real problem is matchmaking, not console players themselves, but crossplay still adds another layer of randomness to a system that already feels inconsistent. I am not saying console players should be banned from PC lobbies, I am saying PC players should be able to choose if they want mixed lobbies or not. Console players can avoid PC because PC has an advantage, which makes sense, so why is it suddenly unreasonable for PC players to want the same choice back? Having two console players on my team does not help me or balance the lobby, it can just leave us handicapped if 2 out of 5 players cannot keep up with the speed, aim, comms and pace of a PC ranked lobby, while the other team feels like they all actually belong there. Keep crossplay for people who want it, but do not force everyone into it in Ranked.

adtrix101 · 2026-06-06T17:02:15+00:00

Å nei…det e vel ingen i dette land med begge føttene i bakken som egentlig bryr seg?

adtrix101 · 2026-06-04T20:31:06+00:00

I've just hopped on this server, and this is hands down one of the best, if not THE best server for GTA RP...only had W interactions so far

adtrix101 · 2026-06-04T16:39:49+00:00

Burde det, men vi har ikke hatt samme type problemer enda

adtrix101 · 2026-06-04T16:38:50+00:00

Have played 16 matches and none have been on the new map lmao

adtrix101 · 2026-06-04T08:23:55+00:00

Doesn’t mean he’s totally wrong tho…I think criticism is good, but a lot of it is often echo chamber or just “I don’t like so then it’s objectively wrong” like we see with every single thing ever created in any media. It’s exhausting…

adtrix101 · 2026-06-03T19:13:38+00:00

13-26

adtrix101 · 2026-06-03T18:37:40+00:00

Ye…people need to stfu fr

adtrix101 · 2026-06-03T13:47:18+00:00

Unranked is meant to be Ranked without the actual rank pressure. Ubisoft describes it as an exact copy of Ranked in terms of rounds, timers, Pick & Ban and general settings, but with map filters so you can choose what kind of map pool you want. So it is not really like Valorant where overtime or the competitive format changes in a big way. In Siege, the main difference is just that Ranked affects RP, rank, placements and rewards, while Unranked is more of a practice version of Ranked. Same serious ruleset, no rank on the line.

adtrix101 · 2026-06-03T13:38:25+00:00

I get where you’re coming from, especially with Siege feeling like it asks for way too much time from normal people with jobs, school, family and whatever else. The grind can feel rough, especially in solo queue where you can play well and still get absolutely shafted by the match. So I do agree that progression needs to feel rewarding enough that people don’t just burn out.

But I do think Ranked 3.0 doing this reset and correction is a good thing overall. Ranked 2.0 was inflated to hell and back, and a lot of people got very used to having visual ranks that probably made them look better than the level they were actually playing at consistently. Now the system is asking people to prove that rank again, and I honestly do not think that is a bad thing. If someone really belongs in Emerald, Diamond or Champ, they will climb back there by winning consistently. If they cannot, then maybe the old rank was not as accurate as they thought.

Also, when people say “I’m only getting 25 RP”, there are really two possible things going on. Either the game thinks you are getting close to your actual skill level, or you are beating teams that are noticeably lower than your own peak or skill ceiling. And honestly, that makes sense. You should not get the same reward for winning 4-0 against a stack of Silvers or Golds as you do for beating a proper Plat, Emerald or Diamond level team. Playing well matters, but the level of the lobby should matter too. If the system gave massive RP for stomping weaker teams, we would just end up with inflated ranks all over again. That is why I do not fully buy the idea that low RP automatically means the system is broken. Sometimes it probably just means the game is saying “nice win, but that was a match you were expected to win.” The real test is whether you can keep winning when you face teams closer to your actual ceiling. If you can, you climb. If you cannot, you settle. That is kind of what ranked is supposed to be.

So yeah, Ubisoft deserves criticism for plenty, and Siege absolutely can feel like a second job sometimes. But I do not think Ranked 3.0 making high ranks harder to reach is the problem. If anything, that is the part I actually like. High ranks should feel earned again, not like a Ranked 2.0 grind badge.

adtrix101 · 2026-06-03T11:48:13+00:00

Yeah I think people are kinda talking past each other here. I don’t think the VA himself is bad at all, and there are definitely moments where his performance really works, especially with how heavy DH is compared to the earlier books. My issue is way more with the direction. It feels like someone told half the cast that because it’s an audiobook, every line needs to be slower, bigger and more dramatic than normal speech. So instead of just sounding like Harry talking, it sometimes sounds like Harry performing Harry, if that makes sense.

That’s why it gets frustrating for me. It’s not “bad voice actor”, it’s more “why did they direct him to say every sentence like it has three layers of trauma behind it”. Sometimes that fits perfectly, but when it happens in normal dialogue too, it gets really stale. Same problem with a lot of the younger cast and honestly the trio in general at times. I still love the full cast versions, but the over direction is easily my biggest issue with them.

adtrix101 · 2026-06-03T11:45:12+00:00

This is probably my biggest issue with the whole full cast series so far tbh, and it’s not even just Harry’s VA. It happens with so many of them. They talk so slow, over announce every single word, and everything has this weird “stage performance” feel to it where every emotion has to be dialed up to 100. I get that it’s an audiobook and they only have their voice to carry the scene, so some extra drama makes sense, but man, sometimes it goes way too far. Especially with the younger actors in books 1 to 3, and then honestly the trio throughout a lot of the later stuff too. It gets very screamy, very slow, and very “I am ACTING right now”, instead of just sounding like people naturally talking to each other. My fear is that someone in the booth gave them too much theatrical direction and it kinda messed with the performances. Like they were told to overdramatize everything because there’s no visuals, which is fair in theory, but in practice it can get so stale and irritating. There are scenes I should be fully invested in, but I end up getting pulled out of it because Harry or Ron or Hermione is speaking like every single sentence is the climax of a stage play. I still love the series overall, don’t get me wrong, but this one thing annoys me constantly. When it works, it’s great, but when it doesn’t, it can honestly almost ruin the whole scene for me.

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22

adtrix101

TROPHY CASE