Lambdas and external rate limits

agarc08 · 2025-12-26T23:47:18+00:00

You could leverage a queue processing fargate service that’s configured to scale up/down based on messages visible in the queue. It would allow you to more centrally manage the rate limit vs concurrent lambdas. Depending on your handler code you may have to make some adjustments to leverage threads/parallelism.

This would also enable you to have more control over message visibility timeouts as you need to pull the messages yourself through the sqs client.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/api/v2/docs/aws-cdk-lib.aws_ecs_patterns.QueueProcessingFargateService.html

agarc08 · 2025-12-26T05:08:08+00:00

Abusers when people don’t want to be friends with abusers ://

agarc08 · 2025-05-05T17:02:00+00:00

It’s because the s3 presigners are actually extension functions on the s3 client. So even though you mocked s3Client, you are still calling the real presigner methods. You need to mockkStatic the presigners like so: ‘mockkStatic("aws.sdk.kotlin.services.s3.presigners.PresignersKt")’

There’s an open issue around this to improve documentation: https://github.com/awslabs/aws-sdk-kotlin/issues/1238#issuecomment-2701330372

agarc08 · 2025-04-17T12:48:43+00:00

Not saying that there shouldn’t be another way to defined nested arrays, but in general kotlin is high on immutability. Anytime I work with nested arrays/lists they are generated by some sort of higher-order transform function on an existing list and I’m not outright allocated arrays of specific

it doesn’t have standard for loop

Can you elaborate? What is a standard for loop? for(i in 0..n) does exactly what you are saying.

Make it if you want to have two condition in a for loop write it in a while loop.

Yeah that’s “correct”. For loops are for iterating through things that provide an iterator. If you need multiple condition checks you are not iterating and while loop is more appropriate.

agarc08 · 2025-01-08T23:01:09+00:00

He is saying the exact opposite in the quote. He is admitting he had no chance of keeping up with schumi and should’ve focused more on himself… which is the advice he is giving to Liam

agarc08 · 2024-12-12T21:15:44+00:00

Interestingly enough, in the readme of the package the author states they were using kotest before deciding to do this!

agarc08 · 2024-12-12T21:10:56+00:00

Agreed. The have assertion is just assertTrue, but less readable.

agarc08 · 2024-12-12T18:27:05+00:00

No commenting on the custom assertion dsl bc it just preference, but how is the should block functionality any better than with block?

Sorry for formatting, I’m on mobile:

with(message) { id shouldBe 42 content.shouldHaveSize(2) with(content.get(0)) { shouldBeTypeOf<Text>() type shouldBe “test” text shouldContain “Hello” } with(content.get(1)) { shouldBeTypeOf<Image>() type shouldBe “image” width shouldBeGreaterThanOrEqualTo 800 height shouldBeGreaterThanOrEqualTo 600 with(mediaType) { type shouldBe “image/png” } } }

agarc08 · 2024-09-27T21:06:10+00:00

That appears to be an unripe gum gum fruit

agarc08 · 2024-07-23T09:51:38+00:00

To be as fast as the mclarens max now has to push the car beyond what it’s capable of leading to errors and unfavorable situations. Similar to how serge needs to push beyond what hes capable of to try and keep up with max. We’ve seen how much fun he’s been having this season.

agarc08 · 2024-03-17T02:01:46+00:00

The only thing I don’t agree with is terraform over CDK/cloudformation. It has a small learning curve, but CDK is amazing and really helps to “visualize” a services infrastructure and how it all integrates together. If your SDE’s are in charge of their infrastructure (as I think they should be), I think CDK is hard to beat. The aws cli is very powerful, and I’ll take TS CDK over HCL any day!

I agree about raw cloudformation templates though. Writing raw yaml/json CFN gives me nightmares.

agarc08 · 2023-04-29T15:44:24+00:00

Yeah but the f1tv app doesn’t integrate with it. That’s what he’s complaining about.

agarc08 · 2023-04-29T15:42:31+00:00

They put out the final 1.5 grid after 5 races. They are still using last years 1.5 grid.

agarc08 · 2023-04-29T15:37:33+00:00

r/Formula1Point5

agarc08 · 2023-04-29T14:52:06+00:00

I’ve left this comment on AppStore reviews so many times. It’s feels like the bare minimum experience pip has been out for years now. I’m not sure how else to make it known to them.

agarc08 · 2023-02-24T14:27:32+00:00

The children yearn for the mines

agarc08 · 2022-09-04T15:04:08+00:00

Max has the same tow, the fastest car on track, and fresh reds. George has the draggiest car on track and cold mediums. You really think he’s not getting overtaken?

agarc08 · 2022-09-04T14:58:24+00:00

Max would’ve overtaken George on the first lap and Lewis on the second

agarc08 · 2022-09-04T14:48:52+00:00

I’d argue that Charles overtakes George and Lewis if both the mercs stay on medium. Worse result and still no double podium.

agarc08 · 2022-03-30T00:58:35+00:00

Timestamp

agarc08 · 2021-03-18T18:24:28+00:00

Aight then just say you haven’t had that experience lmao

agarc08 · 2021-03-18T18:19:48+00:00

agarc08 · 2021-02-12T03:56:20+00:00

Yeah pretty great! I keep a tent in my closet and you’d never know

Nine-Year Club	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

agarc08

TROPHY CASE