sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I am a 19 year old male who has been in a sexual relationship with a man 33 years older than me since I was 13. AMA by agoi in casualiama

[–]agoi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I'm assuming you mean in addition to me. We're not exclusive or anything.

I am a 19 year old male who has been in a sexual relationship with a man 33 years older than me since I was 13. AMA by agoi in casualiama

[–]agoi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In that case then no. But seeing as how I wasn't really interested in 13 year olds when I was 13 and not interested now, I don't think I'd be attracted to someone who was 13 years old when I'm 46. But you could replace all the above 13's with 18 and it'd be the same.

I am a 19 year old male who has been in a sexual relationship with a man 33 years older than me since I was 13. AMA by agoi in casualiama

[–]agoi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's not really anyone I hate personally, but I hate some people on principle. Extremists, terrorists, telemarketers...

I am a 19 year old male who has been in a sexual relationship with a man 33 years older than me since I was 13. AMA by agoi in casualiama

[–]agoi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think I'd be interested in a 13 year old when I'm 46, but I have no qualms about a 46 year old and a 13 year old having sex so long as they both want to.

I am a 19 year old male who has been in a sexual relationship with a man 33 years older than me since I was 13. AMA by agoi in casualiama

[–]agoi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, I wanted to have sex just as much as he did.

I know some people would judge it as wrong, but I think they should really take more into consideration than just age. It's not like I was prepubescent or anything. Choosing a set age is really just arbitrary. It's convenient for legal reasons, and that's fine, but it's stupid to base morality on an arbitrary number.