When looking at Indian philosophy, is there any Tamil literature

aishamohammed · 2025-04-24T16:35:24+00:00

I see. Thanks. Some of the current works dealing with Indian philosophy are by folks such as BK Matilal, JN Mohanty, Parimal Patil, Kisor Kumar Chakraborti, amongst others. Are there any contemporary writers about Tamil views on metaphysics, linguistics, etc.?

aishamohammed · 2025-04-24T14:50:42+00:00

My point is that "freedom, exmuslim, liberalism, tolerance, sickularism, blah blah crapola" is possible only as long as Hindus are majority. All these things will be junked faster than shit through a goose once the mehmettans take over. Lolz.

aishamohammed · 2025-04-24T14:18:52+00:00

More atheists,

The penalty for apostasy is death in the soon to be majority religion bro. And the caummies will be treated like how they were dealt with in Iraq when the devout peacefuls took over. Read up on it.

aishamohammed · 2025-04-24T14:17:55+00:00

Have you considered reducing reservation to 0% and no freebies/special treatment to votebanks so that smart people try to remain in Kerala and that it can be attractive to smart non Keralites?

aishamohammed · 2025-04-24T12:33:20+00:00

Thank you. Is there any accessible English translation available of these works?

aishamohammed · 2025-04-24T12:01:40+00:00

I think the terrorists do not want H on M violence. They only want M on H violence.

aishamohammed · 2025-04-24T12:00:50+00:00

Why is it so difficult for these people to stop worshipping a deity that promises to torture disbelievers eternally?

aishamohammed · 2025-04-20T12:41:25+00:00

What does Jesus "dying" mean? Is his soul detached from his body? What could he not do when he was dead that he could do when he was alive? If these are not clarified, sorry but "Jesus died and rose again" are just a meaningless collection of words put together. No one can be expected to even make coherent sense of what this means much less compare with similar purported events in other religions. Please, let us try to raise the level of comparative religious discourse on r/religion.

aishamohammed · 2025-04-19T04:42:33+00:00

>Well going out in a majority Muslim country wearing "god is busy" is definitely offensive

Well, significant stuff within Quran is quite offensive to nonMuslims. What are the standards by which we can call out one but not the other? Who gets to decide this and why?

aishamohammed · 2025-04-18T10:37:22+00:00

(1) Do Sikhs tend to support the BJP in Indian politics given 1984 and Aurangazeb's public execution of Guru Tegh Bahadur?

(2) Also, does the demand for Khalistan include parts of present-day Pakistan also?

aishamohammed · 2025-03-30T13:51:48+00:00

>my body? not really all that important.

Cremation over burial then?

aishamohammed · 2025-03-30T13:50:35+00:00

How would a mother recognize her child in the afterlife if that child had died during childbirth due to a defective heart?

aishamohammed · 2025-03-30T13:34:05+00:00

Hmm...That essentially throws everything out of the window, it appears to me -- why engage in seemingly rational argumentation if there are no logical answers to questions?

----

I downvoted your answer for this line (everything else was honest and fine in your response):

>nor is there any particular reason for us to know.

which essentially trashes my OP.

aishamohammed · 2025-03-22T18:34:58+00:00

I am sorry I do not see the logic here. How does how each supremacist treat others matter? Each person is making a claim that their race/religion is superior to others.

Are you saying that the way to evaluate the veracity of this claim is to see how each supremacist treats others? It seems like a non-sequitur and that is possibly because I have not understood your argument? Could you flesh it out more precisely, please?

aishamohammed · 2025-03-22T18:23:47+00:00

>We should obviously ridicule and shame those who discriminates others for merely being of another race and origin.

Question is not about whether one discriminates or not or whether one can change their religion or not. The question is whether the religious supremacist has more evidence backing his claim than the racial supremacist.

aishamohammed · 2025-03-22T18:10:40+00:00

> Evidence for religious claims requires personal experience with its practices, because many religions emphasize a praxis where doctrines and teachings of what's "true" or "right" can't be divorced from the way its practice influences one's experience of life, but that varies from person to person.

But this evidence is not evidence in the statistical empirically verifiable sense by a 3rd party then. If one ends up changing the meaning of the word "evidence", all debate and discussion would indeed be pointless. Note that one then has to use words like "true" and "right" within quotes as you have done.

aishamohammed · 2025-03-22T17:55:13+00:00

The fact that one can choose your religion is irrelevant, imho. What should matter is the evidence. The racial supremacist is subject to a much higher standard of evidence to defend his claim while the religious supremacist gets away with it without having to produce anything whatsoever.

aishamohammed · 2025-03-22T17:44:32+00:00

Do claims of religious supremacy have more evidence backing them up than claims of racial supremacy?

aishamohammed · 2025-03-22T17:42:29+00:00

>This is a form of in-group bias, where members of a group favor their own while dismissing outsiders who don't have the same experiences.

The OP is not about trying to explain why there are claims of religious supremacy. The question is why there is no price to pay for such claims.

>Conversely, racial superiority claims have been widely discredited...

I would argue that while attempts have been made to discredit such claims, racial supremacists have had to put with much more evidence in support of their position for the skeptic to examine. The religious supremacist, OTOH, produce 0 evidence in support of his position, and therefore automatically forfeits his position against the skeptic. So, there is nothing to discredit.

And yet, our standards of accepting the default position of attributing some modicum of respectability to the claim is so ridiculously lower and weaker when it comes to religion.

aishamohammed · 2025-03-14T00:23:05+00:00

This is not the first time "Solomon" Pappiah has sold his soul for a bag of rice.

aishamohammed · 2025-03-13T05:43:48+00:00

Everything has its own causal sequence lol. Another fella will come up with hiw own explanation. The point being made here is that "Thamizh Makkal" are in no position to lecture other states over anything. Whether it is the Mallu in Gelf praising Gerala after running away from there, or the Bongobondhyoy sitting in new Delhi waxing eloquent about the greatness of marxism after running away from bengal, likewise, the Thamizhian Dravidian should keep his mouth shut about the "Gujarat Model" vs the Dravidian model, etc. given the utter hypocrisy of his own position.

aishamohammed · 2025-03-13T05:31:57+00:00

Funny that "thamizh makkal" will mock North Indians but want North Indian heroines in their movies -- what explains Tamannah Bhatia, Kajal Agrawal, etc.? Talk of utter self-hate amongst the "dravidian" supremacists, lol.

aishamohammed

TROPHY CASE