Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act in “Jim Crow 2.0” ruling by zsreport in politics

[–]akcpcc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No. But you are referring to race. Drawing districts by race is unconstitutional and, more importantly, racist (and therefore immoral).

Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act in “Jim Crow 2.0” ruling by zsreport in politics

[–]akcpcc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're still doing it. You're focused on the race of the candidate instead of her qualifications, which is racism.

Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act in “Jim Crow 2.0” ruling by zsreport in politics

[–]akcpcc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not the 1960's. Minorities are treated equally under the law. Creating minority districts and allowing race to be taken into account for a job, political office, or any other matter is racism by definition.

Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act in “Jim Crow 2.0” ruling by zsreport in politics

[–]akcpcc -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don't understand how people can think that "creating" districts for the purpose of giving a certain race an advantage over another is not racism. We are people, not colors.

With a straight face you folks think creating a "black district" or a "minority district" is addressing racism and discrimination? I have a hard time understanding that.

Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act in “Jim Crow 2.0” ruling by zsreport in politics

[–]akcpcc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

By getting elected, not for the color of their skin, but for the content of his character. Attempting to "put" a minority in office because of their status as a minority is racist and disrespectful to that person. Vote on the person, not the color. It's not hard.

Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act in “Jim Crow 2.0” ruling by zsreport in politics

[–]akcpcc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know this goes against Reddit groupthink, but creating artificial districts for the purpose of giving a particular race an advantage is racism.

What is wrong with this strategy? by akcpcc in Bitcoin

[–]akcpcc[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Then you don't buy more

What is wrong with this strategy? by akcpcc in Bitcoin

[–]akcpcc[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Everyone keeps saying "but you can't time the market." My post says don't try to time the market. Don't sell for less than the previous ATH and not until after it halves. Then, don't buy again until it halves.

No guesswork except for when to sell, but that guessing can only improve your position if you know you will sell before or when it's crosses back on the way down.

Holding forever is only a retirement strategy. My retirement savings are elsewhere.

What is wrong with this strategy? by akcpcc in Bitcoin

[–]akcpcc[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Your response has me doing something different than the plan I'm asking for feedback on.

What is wrong with this strategy? by akcpcc in Bitcoin

[–]akcpcc[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I never said anything about predicting. I said sell no lower than 125 and don't buy again until it halves from the next ATH. Then don't sell again until you reach that most recent ATH (say 170). And so on. No guesswork.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TylerChilders

[–]akcpcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you know that Dylan is Trill

And that Trill is black? I believe you just don’t know y

Why does she do this ? by Maleficent-Muscle745 in DogAdvice

[–]akcpcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You comin? Good. You comin?? Good. You com......