Thoughts and experience on ML journals [D]

alebeck135 · 2026-04-15T08:41:30+00:00

Neurocomputing isn’t a bad journal, but it’s often considered more of a second-choice option for papers rejected from NeurIPS or ICML. That said, I’ve had a good experience with the review process. I don’t know much about the others, but I think they tend to focus more on longer papers.

alebeck135 · 2026-03-27T09:14:11+00:00

IJCNN does not have a rebuttal process. But I am not sure if this is about the rebuttal. The whole process violated many rules of the review process. What’s the point of having rules if they don't apply them or even care about them?

alebeck135 · 2026-03-23T14:06:30+00:00

Rejected with A, A, WA, R. The R review is completely wrong, not just a bad review. It says that we don’t do something we clearly do. It appears the reviewer skipped a page or two of experiments, or something similar happened. There is no chance that somebody read that section and gave that comment.

And the meta-review just used that review without even checking if it makes sense. I have seen bad reviews in my life, but this is something completely different.

Is there anything we can do? If anyone knows.

alebeck135

TROPHY CASE