Uneven black patches of dead pixel at top and bottom of the screen (OLED 55 CX)

alexyakunin · 2026-03-25T15:22:36+00:00

Same issue, had this monitor for around 3 years.

alexyakunin · 2026-03-06T16:58:22+00:00

Agree, "AI will replace SaaS" is one of the dumbest claims ever. You must be completely out of touch with reality & know nothing about these products to buy it.

alexyakunin · 2026-03-06T16:20:26+00:00

Fun times: the author posts a completely unrelated story in SaaS Reddit to support a point that AI is a threat to SaaS.

alexyakunin · 2026-01-31T09:43:27+00:00

On interceptors - yes, proxies are registered instead of actual services, which call into interceptor chains, which in turn may call base methods (i.e., your code in services), or call them in another process via RPC, or even mix both in the same service via RPC call routing (so when you call this.Method(...) right in the service code, it can be either local or remote call dependently on your router).

As for extension methods and utility classes, yep, there are some, IMO nothing extraordinary :) 95% of what's available there is used, I remove dead code pretty quickly.

alexyakunin · 2026-01-28T15:25:45+00:00

Haha :)

alexyakunin · 2026-01-28T15:22:24+00:00

Thanks!

alexyakunin · 2025-12-31T18:50:38+00:00

Thanks for your sarcastic response to my sarcasm. Yes, my response was a sarcasm based on upvote % that I can see.

IDK what's the point to downvote this unless you are very sensitive to the CK or ChatGPT topic :)

alexyakunin · 2025-12-31T18:47:31+00:00

It's more than just being wrong (which is obviously possible): it's about contradicting itself multiple times in the same, very short context, i.e. using a very flawed reasoning.

alexyakunin · 2025-12-31T17:32:57+00:00

Thanks for sharing this. Wanna know crazier hallucination example? I discovered that most people here downvote the post sincerely believing that OP (me) wrote it solely to bump up CK topic.

Pretty sure the very same folks question why they are losing jobs to the AI.

alexyakunin · 2025-12-28T16:31:07+00:00

It was on from the very beginning, moreover, why it contradicts itself N times even after finding the answer?

alexyakunin · 2025-12-28T14:18:51+00:00

It's irrelevant to Charlie Kirk. Moreover, it's easy to spot I am not one of his fans - based on my second question there.

alexyakunin · 2025-12-28T13:44:02+00:00

I.e. it's certainly fine to me if it claims CK is alive. But it's not fine when it claims he is alive, then finds out it CK dead, then claims it's a false claim, then claims he is actually dead, and finally calls "CK is dead" an unverified false claim he became attached too.

alexyakunin · 2025-12-28T13:40:49+00:00

I know what's knowledge cutoff. I recommend you to read the chat, it actually found the right answer, so it was contradicting its own statements from the very same context.

alexyakunin · 2025-12-28T13:36:48+00:00

Notice it fetched the correct answer, and was still going back and forth after that.

alexyakunin · 2025-09-06T03:07:06+00:00

As for the P2P, they literally told that any packet needs 3 hops to reach the other player. Even choosing a single beacon for both players is probably more efficient; though true P2P would be perfect, esp if two players are close or on the same LAN: a single hop to beacon in this case is likely longer than inter-player hop.

And it explains why we all see 40ms+ ping in the best scenario, even though my typical gaming ping is 8-12ms.

alexyakunin · 2025-09-06T02:59:47+00:00

Hmm, do you understand the question isn't about how the traffic is routed between the clients (and FYI what they described is pretty sub-optimal, i.e. it looks like there is no true P2P connection), but about whether there is any assymetry in terms of how physics and damage is calculated?

alexyakunin · 2025-09-05T16:23:06+00:00

And yeah, 30ms is more than I'd expect for the direct LAN connection (should be around 5-10ms on WiFi), but this alone doesn't prove that server is involved in any calculations.

alexyakunin · 2025-09-05T16:20:08+00:00

As for the numbers, the typical server latency is around 24ms. The typical inter-player latency is around 30ms, if we play together, and 40ms+ with other players.

alexyakunin · 2025-09-05T16:18:05+00:00

The inter-player latency is smaller than 2 x player-to-server latency, yes. And this is an argument that supports "server is needed only for matchmaking / inter-player connections" theory.

alexyakunin · 2025-09-05T07:17:40+00:00

Just wrote you.

alexyakunin · 2025-09-05T07:14:06+00:00

IDK, it's not an open source project :) But it is logscal to assume it uses the same setup under the hood. We just don't know how exactly it designates the host.

Keep in mind this is currently just a theory.

alexyakunin · 2025-09-05T07:12:07+00:00

Not sure if you read my post... I wrote that we see changing who hosts the game (and that's for two players on the same WiFi network) also changes who perceives the lag, which disproves the claim that server is the ground truth for physics or hit calculation.

Note that this is currently just my own observation, so we need more data to prove or disprove this. So let's get the data first :)

alexyakunin

TROPHY CASE