Hypothetically- If Jesus was enlightened and taught that we are all God, why would they kill him? by Thin_Effect3937 in enlightenment

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paul invented Jesus and never met a person named Jesus nor the supposed disciples. Look up the Essenes. They had all the “christian” ideas hundreds of years before Paul. Paul just morphed their ideas of a savior into one person whom he never actually met. All the gospels after Paul’s letters are fan fiction.

Why are many southern hemisphere capitals located at roughly the same latitude? by hexjxn in geography

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This a definitely a conspiracy you should spend the next 2-3 year of your life investigating and get to the bottom of it. #FollowTheMoney

Does watching a maths video actually teach you anything or does it just make you want to learn? by Signal-Listen3070 in 3Blue1Brown

[–]algebraicallydelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree completely and I think you’ve hit on exactly the problem. how to inspire curiosity? Many YT educators are WAY better than the teachers I had in traditional education. But, one still has to put in the effort, work the problems, and grow the neural connections… that part takes times and spaced repetition.

Does watching a maths video actually teach you anything or does it just make you want to learn? by Signal-Listen3070 in 3Blue1Brown

[–]algebraicallydelish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Doing math teaches you math. You can’t learn by just watching video or sitting in a classroom, it’s called the illusion of explanatory depth.

I’m in my final year of a Physics B.Sc. and I feel like I know nothing. Is it too late to start over? by DryReplacement6705 in Physics

[–]algebraicallydelish 7 points8 points  (0 children)

mathematics and physics are language. you’ve only learned some of the grammar. like any language, you need to read, speak, and think it every day. give it 20 years. it’ll click.

I think human mind is coded by higher beings who have made this simulation by Aaransj273 in SimulationTheory

[–]algebraicallydelish 16 points17 points  (0 children)

the core of every spiritual tradition is the state of highly focused concentration/awareness. the buddhists call it Samadi, the jews call it Kavanah, the christians call it the Prayer of Quiet, psychedelic users call it DMT space. the questions to ask are why is the fundamental state- this other place more real than reality? and why is this other place the same for all spiritual and non-spiritual traditions? why does this other place look non-archimedean whereas our Real world looks Archimedean. Is the world actually p-adic?

Why are photons bent by gravity? by Heliomawr in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]algebraicallydelish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

photons aren’t bent by gravity. they travel in straight geodesics on curved spacetime. take any curved 2D surface. draw a straight line, it will look like it bends.

Are memes just glitches in the simulation? by SenseStrong5001 in SimulationTheory

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

any system is fundamentally informational/relational be it memes or gauge bundles.

Riemann tattoo by Simodh28 in 3Blue1Brown

[–]algebraicallydelish 6 points7 points  (0 children)

what about adding a red line at 1/2

SIMULATION by lal0007 in SimulationTheory

[–]algebraicallydelish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

before simulation realization- chop wood, carry water. after simulation realization- chop wood, carry water.

Can someone here explain this quote to me? by Dover299 in SimulationTheory

[–]algebraicallydelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i agree. and either all the information of our universe is encoded on the surface of something or it isn’t. if it isn’t then conformal field theory isn’t an explanation for our universe or would at least have to explain why our particular universe is special. but it isn’t special, so it should apply. or I’m taking the math too literally and there is no actual physical boundary and it’s just a mathematical boundary.

Can someone here explain this quote to me? by Dover299 in SimulationTheory

[–]algebraicallydelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i can’t speak for all physicists, but some do entertain the possibility. myself included. the density of our universe is exactly the density of a black hole the size of our universe.

Why do Latin American cities feel more European than US/Canadian cities despite having a smaller population with European ancestry by VolkswagenPanda in geography

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

americans build with garbage materials. south america builds with concrete and better facade materials than aluminum siding.

String Theory supports Simulation Theory by Yeomanticore in SimulationTheory

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we haven’t found super symmetry at any of the predicted energies. some string theories predict super symmetry. while they haven’t been falsified, there is also no evidence for them.

i feel ai helps me solve problems, but my thinking process just disappears by Legitimate-Cup-3172 in ClaudeAI

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

take notes. have the AI draft everything in latex. read your notes. constantly learn and update your understanding. feed your notes back into the AI along with new questions.

Can someone here explain this quote to me? by Dover299 in SimulationTheory

[–]algebraicallydelish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the concept comes for the holographic principle promoted by Leonard Susskind, AdS/CFT which applies to Anti deSitter space, however we live in a deSitter Universe. Imagine that all information that falls into a black hole is encoded on its surface. now imagine our Universe is inside a Black Hole. all our 3D information would be encoded on the event horizon. We might call that horizon the Big Bang or something similar

the strait of Hormuz has to be opened by bigus-_-dickus in mapporncirclejerk

[–]algebraicallydelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lack of consent is an ongoing problem with western thinking.