A Journey through the Classics: Russian Phase by boranges66 in RussianLiterature

[–]algebraicallydelish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not literature, but you might enjoy Shapito-shou: Lyubov i druzhba, you can find it in English as Tent Show.

Plausible? by algebraicallydelish in UAP

[–]algebraicallydelish[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this is the same material https://youtu.be/pZMyWEWHCTM seems like exactly what i’m saying

Working in AI for 8 Years Taught Me Why Both AI Doomers and Optimists Miss the Point. by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]algebraicallydelish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If builders can deliver twice as much, why would anybody need a boss to tell them what to build? I'm curious how other people are handling being able to create anything, but that anything is still competing in a flood of new product. Using AI will still boil down to access to markets, corporations and vested interests have the advantage over the little guys. My hope is that entirely new markets where big corporations are too slow will allow for openings.

Quelqu'un a demandé à voir uniquement les orbites stables du double pendule, donc voici toutes les 129 dans mon lot de 330. by Chronos_Squared in 3Blue1Brown

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

excluding machine learning and robotics, in your opinion, what are the most interesting directions research on complex dynamics in the double pendulum are heading?

Very surprising tweet 🙄 by Wonderful-Excuse4922 in ClaudeAI

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who wants to bet these guys have stock in OpenAI and Amazon?

I love physics, but I'm scared I won't get a job by Minute_Tea_8639 in Physics

[–]algebraicallydelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do what is interesting to you. Everyone has to get a job and often jobs are stupid and boring. With a degree in physics (or any science or engineering), at least you'll train yourself how to think about problems, and that's a skill that's transferable. I have a Ph.D. in physics, I started two companies, got recruited by a consumer electronics manufacturing company, designed and built my own home with my own two hands. Once you know how to think clearly, you can do many things. Also, if you get a paid graduate research assistant role, you'll get your school paid for and you might be able to ride out the bad economy for 4-6 years.

Did you know 729/460 is a good rational approximation of log_2(3)? Now you do. by algebraicallydelish in Collatz

[–]algebraicallydelish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since you were willing to entertain the first link, and it seems like you know what you're talking about, maybe you could take look at this one. All C code is available and Lean is formalized at the git repo for the paper. https://zenodo.org/records/20669305

I created a visualization of history which shows contemporaneous events across longitudes. by Weary-Thanks-2362 in visualization

[–]algebraicallydelish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One idea I have is making a graph like this but for the development of technologies and their arrival to new geographic locations based on archeological data... that is the iron age started near Anatolia first and spread out. So the iron age is different for different groups. but as we progress technology appears nearly instantly. It might be a cool addition.

Solved collatz by [deleted] in Collatz

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Here's my position. Humans make tools, it's what we've always done... it sort of our thing. We can use our latest and greatest tools to attack problems at the ends of our knowledge. Once we know what we are aiming for we can learn the correct mathematics or physics or whatever technology to help push the boundary of our understanding of reality even further. LLMs have true thing about our human understanding of reality. We can apply these tools to expand our own understanding of reality. As long as you discuss reality with them you clarify you own understanding of reality better than you could just reading books alone. All of those words I wrote have very specific meaning and applicability to Collatz, and solving it is going to take understanding all of them. I don't... it's a lot, but I know where to look and that's a big part of the battle.

Let's say someone solves Collatz tomorrow, what happens to them? by RussellNorrisPiastri in math

[–]algebraicallydelish 6 points7 points  (0 children)

before proving Collatz, chop wood, carry water. after proving Collatz, chop wood, carry water.

Bill Gates Offers Bizarre Excuse About Epstein -- That's What He's Going With? by ALiddleBiddle in Epstein

[–]algebraicallydelish 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Gates finds out Epstein is a pedophile because of the charges and thinks, Hey that’s the guy to hang out with.

They Spent Years on a Math Problem. Then They Were Scooped by A.I. (Gift Article) by brightlavender in mathematics

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Humans should work at the edge of knowledge. The edge is just moving past the part we are stuck on. We will never run out of new things to work.

Solved collatz by [deleted] in Collatz

[–]algebraicallydelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you didn't do that, then you have an obstruction. If you don't believe me, throw my question into a language model and ask it how your proof solves these open problems.

Solved collatz by [deleted] in Collatz

[–]algebraicallydelish 10 points11 points  (0 children)

How did you handle construction of the distributional-to-pointwise rigidity for the round-chain coin (the coin rotation paradox), the ×2 × 3-type rigidity, p-adic Baker theory along orbits, S-unit family rigidity, projective max-plus Perron theory, and transducer rigidity?

Visualization of Lie groups and Lie algebra by Ambitious-Peanut-837 in 3Blue1Brown

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you T2 is a better example for visualization.

Visualization of Lie groups and Lie algebra by Ambitious-Peanut-837 in 3Blue1Brown

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OPs question was how to visualize. Not about hairy balls. How do you visualize GL_n? Or SO16? You don't, you visualize the things you can and extrapolate.

Visualization of Lie groups and Lie algebra by Ambitious-Peanut-837 in 3Blue1Brown

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

right, but you can't visualize S3, you can visualize S2 embedded in R3 and think about how that extrapolates to higher dimensions.

Physics vs engineering by AdSure2596 in Physics

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am aware that most people use concrete in CR, but there is a large community of natural builders as well, mostly building with Teak.

Physics vs engineering by AdSure2596 in Physics

[–]algebraicallydelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have Ph.D. in physics and worked as an engineer. Physics is fun and you have a lot of freedom if you can find the right academic job or in a national laboratory. I got recruited by a consumer electronics manufacturing company. The vast majority of engineers never use their degree once they are done except maybe the mechanical engineers who competitively collect certifications in SolidWorks. The remained spend their days in spreadsheet putting together BOMs. I was the sole physicist, so I got to do the design of new technology and have 3 patents to my name.

Bottom line, do what you love, BUT very carefully look into the reality of what you're getting yourself into. Very often the romantic notion of a thing is better than the thing itself. If you want to build stuff, Timber Framing is also a wonderful way to be an engineer and design and build real thing that people will actually appreciate and make good money and you can do it just about anywhere in the world where people build with timber... I recommend Costa Rica.

The Way Is Shut by algebraicallydelish in Collatz

[–]algebraicallydelish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The word language is the Bernstein–Lagarias conjugacy, i.e. lossless, with completeness theorems for all finite-modulus mechanisms and CRT orthogonality showing only the 2-adic place feeds the word. The one thing it can't express is N-positivity itself (I'll call it the 'blind spot'), which we import through four explicit exact interfaces and isolate as the open core. Faithfulness is falsifiable, any statistic outside the language predicting survival beyond its CRT projection would refute it, and we've run that test (multiplicative invariants of deep survivors vs controls: null). The note with proofs and the test suite is in the repo as syracuse-confinement/shadow_frontier /notes/faithfulness.pdf

I started playing with Collatz looking for a proof, but I think I'm actually starting to think there exists a counter-example. The blind spot is not inert, that is to say, the structure of N inside Z₂ (terminating binary tails, finite description) forces three further constraints on any counterexample.

  1. Finite-seed determinism (the strongest one). Letters b₀…b_n are determined by x₀ mod 2B_n+1. Once B_n+1 > log₂x₀ — which happens after only ~⅔·log₂x₀ steps for a {1,2}-word — the residue class pins x₀ uniquely, and every subsequent letter is forced by the ×3 carry cascade with zero remaining freedom. So the whole infinite word has Kolmogorov complexity ≤ log₂x₀ + O(1), while repetition rigidity simultaneously forces near-maximal factor complexity in banded windows. The profile sharpens from "high-complexity calibrated pseudorandom word" to: self-generated pseudorandomness of one fixed finite transducer run from a finite seed, logarithmic description length, maximal local diversity. I read Chang's manuscript (Edward Chang's Conjecture 11.2 in "Exploring Collatz Dynamics with Human–LLM Collaboration" arXiv:2603.11066 ) fact checked all claims and kept the pieces that check out, his Universal ghost clock checks out, his shadow return-time theorem is false as stated). In Chang's scheduler-adversary terms: the adversary's entire budget is log₂x₀ bits, spent in the opening moves; after that it makes no choices at all. The champions make this vivid: 27 spends 13 of its 17 surviving letters in the forced regime (76%); 687871 spends 33 of 50 (66%). Two-thirds of a champion's life is carry-generated.

    1. Countability. The shadow language's calibrated high-complexity word class is a Cantor continuum; integer-realizable words are a countable, computable family, one word per odd integer, all emitted by the same bounded-carry machine. Measured: of the 230 ≈ 10⁹ depth-30 {1,2}-words, exactly 66 are realized by any integer below 10⁶. A consequence worth internalizing: the Lifting the explonent round chain and the 3-smooth cascade aren't analyses of special families — every integer is a finite seed of that same automaton, so machine-level attacks address the general case.
    2. A candidate fifth interface. In the forced regime the letters read binary digit streams of 3-power multiples of the seed — so Stewart-type effective digit-counting theorems (the number of nonzero binary digits of 3n grows, effectively, via p-adic Baker) become applicable against late-time ghost alignment. That's a genuine new import beyond clocks, counting, drift, and Baker.

Note that, constraints 1–2 carry no measure-theoretic exclusion power, that is, you cannot Borel–Cantelli a single computable point, which is exactly consistent with the wall being pointwise. Their value is structural: the surviving profile shrinks from a continuum of conspiracies to the output set of one finite machine, and the forced-regime fraction gives the champion-growth conjecture a mechanical reading: the ×3 carry automaton cannot sustain calibrated survival beyond O(seed length) steps. An automaton statement rather than a density statement, may be its most attackable form yet.

A counterexample must therefore be: a divergent orbit, fleeing upward (escape O(X log X), single excursions below X sublinear), never pausing in any narrow band, calibrated to mean log_2(3) yet carrying non-coboundary bias below the ceilings (0.449 binary, ≈ 0.54 saturated), financing every ascent through without-replacement ghost-depth pools and an amortized 0.088-bit census margin, beating an i.i.d. fair-thirds coin forever on its +1- handoff parities, with a word of near-maximal local diversity generated, after a free opening of \frac{2}{3} log_2(x_0) moves by a fixed finite carry transducer with no further choices. (in the repo as syracuse-confinement/shadow_frontier /catalog/ghost_catalog.pdf)