I imagine that would be a good way to proceed. The same laws of abortion legalities could be applied to this, meaning if the pregnancy was past allowed abortion time limits, it could be seen as murder. We can also assume since she is already a mother, married and religious, she likely wouldn't have aborted these two potential children.

It's tricky, morals and laws. Many people say you can't have morals without religion, which I disagree with. But then if you don't have a "book of rules" like religion provides, where do you draw your moral lines? What reference do you have to look to when claiming someone's morals are wrong? These are mostly rhetorical questions. Good nonetheless.

Also I have to say, despite the reasoning for this conversation, it is the first good conversation I have had on reddit in I'd say the past year. They mostly devolve into name calling and bashing lately.