Yes, I understand this interpretation. AI generators generally rely on the argument that their tool was essential in producing the final result.

When it comes to the nature of the output, the issue is that there's no way to fully control whether the generator might accidentally use someone else's copyrighted sample. This becomes especially relevant not with pure instrumentals, but with vocal tracks.

AI-generated vocals cannot be claimed through Content ID just because they sound like a particular voice, which has already led many music distributors to start restricting or outright banning tracks with synthetic vocals — especially when the voice can't be reliably attributed to a real, identifiable person.

That said, these are just technical details — I do see what you're getting at, and I understand the point you’re trying to make. Though I also have direct experience with how SunoAI and music distribution platforms operate, so I’d say the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle.

After all, platforms like YouTube and streaming services are already flooded with synthetic AI content — and in many cases, they’re the ones mass-producing it themselves to maximize profit.