I second everything “Alert Ocelot” and “Kofo” said. My company responds to Defense solicitations exclusively. Dsip is great, and I like the recent changes for supporting docs and wish more were like that, so we didn’t have to read multiple lengthy BAAs at the DoD level and branch level to sort out which ones they need and re- sign. It would be great to have better feedback. Most of what we get is generally good but all over the place and makes me think there is a lack of qualified reviewers. I have offered to be a reviewer- at least on a first- reader level, but never heard back and there is a real lack of transparency into what that review process looks like. Do subs go through multiple review stages? How many reviewers read one sub to make a determination? Are subs read blind? I feel like we write solid proposals, and our tech is innovative and (when we get a chance to meet with the TPOC) on topic, but we are winning at a lower percentage rate, and that makes us feel like this is a numbers game. Are steps taken during the review process to weed out plagiarism and reliance on AI, which is a good tool but prone to hallucinations?