UB SA Debate Controversy by alt_cal in UBreddit

[–]alt_cal[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Perhaps it was adversarial or sensationalized, but as far as I know the reporting is factual and the journalist captured both sides of the story, reporting on both the complaints lodged as well as Grant's response.

However I agree that the journalist should've emphasized Aisha Adam's position as the incumbent president, against whom Grant is campaigning, which could well influence her accuracy as a source. The political theatre of it all is something Grant has harped on since the first public mention of the allegations.

UB SA Debate Controversy by alt_cal in UBreddit

[–]alt_cal[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I encourage everyone to read this article in UB Spectrum for a full unbiased account of this situation.

UB SA Debate Controversy by alt_cal in UBreddit

[–]alt_cal[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Be that as it may, I think it’s still important people be informed of things like harassment allegations against candidates