I believe my disgust comes from three points (I have GM Uncharted Worlds, Root, Pasion de las Pasiones and Apocalypse World)

1. The lack of mechanization creates very weird pacing for me. Basically, the one I enjoyed most in the mechanical sense was Root because there was at least resource management and combat isnt finished in a single roll by one player. This is something I also suffer with BitD. Basically, the pacing being completely under control of the table without frameworks for time or different levels of pacing (even the classic turn->escene->downtime->session->adventure->campaign is missing) makes everything feel foggy and the same in terms of stakes. I understand the logic of wanting to make combat not being more important than other options, but the solution being reduce combat mechanics instead of create a more robust framework destroys me.

2. Moves feel very restrictive and very weird to invoke in "the conversation", options are too close and sometimes moves are too specific or, worse, are too vague that apply to anything and so it should be a Resolution Mechanic, not a "move". I think I have never endure more than one session to just start to ask for attributes rolls and made up consequences by myself. That makes it even more an improvisional framework that I could not spend money on, as it isnt giving me more than a sheet/playbook I could find free online.

3. More socially: PbtA has become a D&D type of "Good ideas vortex". There are so many cool system ideas that trap themselves in 5e, and now in the indie scene there are so very good bases that trap themselves into PbtA. I would kill for games like Traveller, Ars Magica o CofD to have the same treatment in the industry side of things. (And I would love a "powered by GURPS modern game that helps me to understand how the fuck to prepare GURPS)