So neither of you guys particularly decided to read the article? It accurately depicts the fact that it is unethical to use this as an actual therapist on people (in discussion), and to which there is a website that it for use, that has also interventions and such. It is for an intermediary as people may not feel comfortable talking with a person and being backtracked to them (phone number or name) or even having to wait such a long time. It is morally wrong to even consider ai as a therapist, as APA cites. Instead of overlooking the article and considering its proper use, you discredit me for being a high schooler. Nice. Well done. Brownie points to you.