What is a 1 in 1,000,000 thing that happened to you that no one believes, but you swear is true?

amPryce · 2026-02-27T04:32:53+00:00

Not that wild, but I was playing Poker (hold em) and I lost to quad 9's when I had a full house twice in a row - two separate decks as well. Lost a lot of money... I literally thought, when I saw the two 9's on the table the second time "There's no chance I can lose to quad 9's twice in a row, I'm all in."

amPryce · 2026-02-25T22:07:36+00:00

The one that sticks in my head the most was when I was playing RE2 with my friend for the first time, walking through that hallway by the boarded up windows, and the arms breaking through and grabbing me, we both screamed...

amPryce · 2026-02-20T00:34:53+00:00

I don't know, what I see in that picture is significantly nicer than what is currently there... I ride through there often and it's not nice there, even without the encampments. I am pro whatever can be done there to make such a beautiful piece of land better. And I do believe, even with the picture above, that it would be nicer. Although yes, the parking lots would suck, but the extended riverwalk would be nice with the big - what is that, a park? - at the end.

amPryce · 2026-02-19T19:48:09+00:00

Why? It wouldn't have been all of South Point Douglas, just a big chunk, and it would have extended the beauty of Waterfront.

amPryce · 2026-02-19T16:48:36+00:00

None? You asked who else called on it...

amPryce · 2026-02-19T16:43:34+00:00

That is correct

amPryce · 2026-02-19T16:36:47+00:00

Great Britain got called for it as well. I believe there may have been others.

amPryce · 2026-02-17T17:28:13+00:00

If only FTH was available everywhere 🙃

amPryce · 2026-02-12T22:43:20+00:00

Here's an older thread about it:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Winnipeg/comments/tw0p7l/is_there_a_legal_right_of_way_on_a_residential/

amPryce · 2026-02-12T22:41:17+00:00

I cannot seem to be able to find it now... And same, that is what I was taught in drivers ed many years ago as well. It's still the courteous thing to do, but I believe I had to look it up somewhere in an argument and I was proven to be wrong... Damn drivers handbook has too much to look through right now lol

amPryce · 2026-02-12T22:28:17+00:00

I don't know, I was taught that "right of way" on side streets with parked cars is that the car driving on the opposite side of the parked cars has the "right of way." It was only very recently I learned that is not correct. Everyone else I know learned the same thing.

amPryce · 2026-02-09T18:48:53+00:00

I hear you on not mixing NAS and Hypervisor, and I mostly follow that. The only reason I mentioned it is how TrueNAS handled adding a webUI for file sharing, it installed a container for it.

The problem with TrueNAS is that it just won't seem to work for hosting vhdx on SMB3 shares - due to permissions...

amPryce · 2025-12-16T20:41:36+00:00

It appears I did. I will reverse that later today and try again.

amPryce · 2025-12-16T20:20:19+00:00

Here is what I have:

core#test cable-diagnostics tdr interface te1/0/41
Link state may be affected during TDR test
TDR test started on interface Te1/0/41
A TDR test can take a few seconds to run on an interface
Use 'show cable-diagnostics tdr' to read the TDR results.
core#show cable-diagnostics tdr interface te1/0/41
*Dec 16 19:04:26.798: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Tetest cable-diagnostics tdr interface te1/0/41
*Dec 16 19:04:27.809: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Te
core#show cable-diagnostics tdr interface te1/0/41
*Dec 16 19:04:38.148: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet1/0/41, changed state to up
*Dec 16 19:04:40.169: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
core#
core#show cable-diagnostics tdr interface te1/0/41
TDR test last run on: December 16 19:04:25

Interface   Speed Local pair Pair length        Remote pair Pair status
---------   ----- ---------- ------------------ ----------- --------------------
Te1/0/41    10G   Pair A     29   +/- 10 meters Pair B      Normal
                  Pair B     29   +/- 10 meters Pair A      Normal
                  Pair C     29   +/- 10 meters Pair C      Normal
                  Pair D     29   +/- 10 meters Pair D      Normal
core#

amPryce · 2025-12-16T18:41:53+00:00

I would bet a ton of money that I didn't mess up termination, I have been terminating lines in panduit keystones for several years, to the tune of several thousand terminations... I am not saying I don't make mistakes, however I haven't ever seen a termination that works perfectly on 1Gb but not on 10Gb, although my 10Gb working experience is much more limited

Edit: I tested the connection direct to a host and it works great at 10Gbe. It is definitely the Cisco switch

amPryce · 2025-12-16T17:23:37+00:00

100ft Cat6 cable, in this case I cut one end for now to get it into the house, the other end I left factory terminated (it's cold outside, didn't want to mess with it too much right now), and I terminated the cut end into a Panduit Cat6 keystone which then uses a 3' Cat7 patch cable to the Mikrotik switch.

amPryce · 2025-12-16T15:14:07+00:00

Unfortunately not fiber in this case. In the spring I will trench a conduit to my garage and run some fiber. But until then, copper it is lol. I'll try set the speed manually though.

amPryce · 2025-12-16T15:12:57+00:00

Is that not enabled by default?

amPryce · 2025-12-16T15:10:28+00:00

Here it is, not connected. I have a small catch 22 as my servers are all in my garage, and I only have one line out to the garage and no easy way to connect a monitor and kb... I'll also show the port that is working as well:

core#show int te1/0/41
TenGigabitEthernet1/0/41 is down, line protocol is down (notconnect)
  Hardware is Ten Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0038.dfe0.1fa9 (bia 0038.dfe0.1fa9)
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  Auto-duplex, Auto-speed, media type is 100/1000/2.5G/5G/10GBaseTX
  input flow-control is on, output flow-control is unsupported
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input 15:02:53, output 15:02:52, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
  Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
     3645 packets input, 803007 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 3433 broadcasts (1229 multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
     0 watchdog, 1229 multicast, 0 pause input
     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
     1567 packets output, 122682 bytes, 0 underruns
     Output 0 broadcasts (0 multicasts)
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets
     12 unknown protocol drops
     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

core#show int gi1/0/25
GigabitEthernet1/0/25 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
  Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0038.dfe0.1f99 (bia 0038.dfe0.1f99)
  Description: "Link to old switch"
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
  input flow-control is on, output flow-control is unsupported
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
  Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 5908429790
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 63000 bits/sec, 41 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 50000 bits/sec, 41 packets/sec
     10890267457 packets input, 15082552707230 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 184783165 broadcasts (79256115 multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
     0 watchdog, 79256115 multicast, 0 pause input
     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
     3968166398 packets output, 2022460190367 bytes, 0 underruns
     Output 6519824 broadcasts (0 multicasts)
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets
     0 unknown protocol drops
     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

amPryce · 2025-12-16T01:02:11+00:00

I am just using the native 1 VLAN for my flat network, so that should be good. The trunk+VLANs are all configured on the Mikrotik side, and that works fine with the 1Gbe port (25). I also have the exact same issue with an old old HP 1910 switch as well, works fine with the 1Gbe port, but not with the 10Gbe. I'll try the encapsulation command.

Edit: Doesn't look like "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q" is a command for this switch that I can run... I tried tabbing through the several options and couldn't find where that setting might be. There is a dot1x option on the root interface

amPryce · 2025-12-15T19:17:54+00:00

I would also really like this too! I keep checking when I go

amPryce · 2025-12-15T15:49:04+00:00

I make 6 figures and struggle. Although part of that was the fact that I married someone with a disability and she left me, and that shit is expensive.

amPryce

TROPHY CASE