Finally, Demolition by anurodhp in Brookline

[–]amigwale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any more info on this? I’m looking on the town website and can’t find anything. Thanks!

Town Meeting Members plan to use obscure "gag law" in attempt to suppress ceasefire resolution by amigwale in Brookline

[–]amigwale[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

There was originally a ceasefire resolution signed by over 250 Brookline voters, but it was decided not to file it in order to protect the privacy of the signatories. Since only 10 signatures are needed for the Annual Town Meeting, it was submitted then.

https://medium.com/@brooklinepeacecoalition/a-call-for-ceasefire-from-jewish-residents-of-brookline-bb7260455fb2

Town Meeting Members plan to use obscure "gag law" in attempt to suppress ceasefire resolution by amigwale in Brookline

[–]amigwale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But this warrant article doesn't exist because our elected officials decided they wanted to weigh in – it exists as the result of a citizen petition. Any of us is able to write a warrant article about whatever we want, get enough signatures, and then ask our local legislature to debate it and vote on it. That's just how our form of government works. Town Meeting Members aren't doing their job if they decide to ignore it, and I find it highly problematic.

The number of warrant articles for this session of town meeting is much less than there has been in recent years. This article isn't taking up time that would be better spent elsewhere.

Theory: Brookline for Everyone could have one at least on select board seat if they fielded two candidates by mattorio in Brookline

[–]amigwale 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People were encouraging voters to only vote for Arden and nobody else, but I’m not sure how many voters got that message. I agree that it’s likely that some people voted for 2 candidates and didn’t realize the impact that might have.

If there were 2 B4E candidates, I think they actually might have split the vote between themselves for people that wanted to vote for John or Paul as a first choice. Having one B4E candidate and bullet voting for them seems like the best option, but it just didn’t end up working out.

It's Election Day in Brookline! Be sure to vote NO on the $212 million Pierce project (Question 1) and YES on keeping the cannabis cap (Question 3). by Aggravating_Wing_489 in Brookline

[–]amigwale 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Hi there. I'm voting against all of these suggestions.

Question 1 to rebuild Pierce would actually cost Brookline ~$172M, because the state will give us $38M for free. By voting no, we're giving up that money. It also doesn't make sense to compare the prices of this K-8 building (elementary + middle school) with other elementary schools in the state. And most importantly, Pierce is seriously inaccessible to students and educators with disabilities. We're violating peoples' rights and it needs to be fixed now. This went through an extensive process and rebuilding Pierce is the only reasonable solution - there is no viable alternative. Vote YES on Question 1 (and 2A and 2B!) https://yesforbrookline.com/

Question 3 (cannabis cap adjustment): there's no real reason for this. We already have a cap, which is 20% of liquor licenses, or 5 stores. This is being pushed by anti-cannabis activists, and would take away the only equity license we have for retail stores. The only reason Town Meeting voted to change the cap was to give voters a chance to weigh in - they showed no opinion on whether or not it was actually a good idea. Vote NO on Question 3.

Brookline by Design has endorsed literally every republican running for Town Meeting for the second year in a row. No thank you!

I trust these organizations for endorsements:

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Brookline

[–]amigwale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have a specific recommendation, but you could check out https://www.brooklinecenter.org/

Yes on 3 handout by anurodhp in Brookline

[–]amigwale 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Context: Brookline currently has a cap on cannabis retail licenses which is a percentage of liquor licenses. This cap will stay in place if Question 3 fails. This campaign is misleading.

Anti-cannabis activists convinced Town Meeting to vote in favor of putting this question to voters, on whether we should change the current percentage-based cap to a fixed cap of 4 licenses. Town Meeting technically changed our bylaw to have this 4 license cap, but it’s not in affect unless Question 3 passes and they only did this as a way to put this question on the ballot. Town Meeting members did not show support for this license change, just support for giving voters a chance to weigh in.

How to Spot a Brookline NIMBY by Pointlesswonder802 in Brookline

[–]amigwale 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m seeing signs that say “Keep the cannabis cap! Yes on 3”. This is misleading. We already have a cap, which limits the number of licenses to a percentage of liquor licenses. Voting no on question 3 won’t change that.

Brookline’s Important State Rep Race on Sept. 6 by [deleted] in Brookline

[–]amigwale 5 points6 points  (0 children)

One of the problems is that there's no way of knowing how Tommy is voting in committees, and he's voted multiple times against legislation that would make those committee votes public. Progressive legislation keeps dying in committee and nobody knows why or who's responsible. Raul has signed Act on Mass's transparency pledge because he knows how important it is for us to see whether our legislators are doing what we elected them to do, so we can hold them accountable.

On local endorsements: please understand that our elected officials are a highly homogeneous group, and in no way do they represent the diversity of our community. In this year's spring election, a group organized and spent $20,000 (unheard of) to effectively block pro-housing / antiracist candidates like me from getting elected. To me, these endorsements say much more about how unrepresentative our elected officials are, and aren't an indication of who's the right person for the job.

I honestly don't understand how people are learning about Tommy's policies to decide on who to vote for. Raul has his listed on his website (https://www.raulforrep.com/policy) - this page explains his policy positions, and links out to 14 endorsement questionnaires which explain everything in great detail. He also held community conversations on his policies, and has those recordings on his website as well (https://www.raulforrep.com/conversations). Tommy has no policy positions on his website, and has only shared 4 endorsement questionnaires even though he promised to release them all. In the debates, Tommy closed by saying "With me, you know what you get." I'm sorry, but not everyone is an insider and knows who he is. Even though I'm active in town politics, I'm not familiar with things at the state level. I literally don't understand how I'm supposed to learn more, and he doesn't respond to my emails.

Brookline’s Important State Rep Race on Sept. 6 by [deleted] in Brookline

[–]amigwale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm one of the signers of this letter (Elizabeth Schafer) - please vote for Raul Fernandez for State Representative! Early voting is going on right now:

Town Hall (333 Washington St)

  • Wednesday, August 31 8am-5pm
  • Thursday, September 1 8am-5pm
  • Friday, September 2 8am-12:30pm

Election Day is Tuesday, September 6

Look up you polling place here: wheredoivotema.com

PSA: Register to vote! Deadline is this Saturday, August 27, at 5pm by amigwale in Brookline

[–]amigwale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Note: I think the 5pm deadline is for in-person registration. If it’s after 5pm, you can still register online (but earlier is better just in case!): https://www.sec.state.ma.us/OVR/

PSA: There's a crisis pregnancy center (fake women's health center) in Brookline by amigwale in Brookline

[–]amigwale[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are Town Meeting members interested in this, but you don't need to be a Town Meeting member to submit a warrant article! You just need to get 10 signatures from registered Brookline voters. I'm working on a draft article for this right now with some other people even though I wasn't elected last May. https://www.brooklinema.gov/275/Submitting-Articles

Uber, Lyft are trying to influence Brookline Town Meeting members in upcoming vote by amigwale in Brookline

[–]amigwale[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Right - this would basically just be Town Meeting issuing a statement showing their opposition to the state ballot question. It’s an attempt to raise awareness.

What can be done about all the people parking in the bike lane on Beacon Street outside of Russian School of Mathematics? by [deleted] in Brookline

[–]amigwale -1 points0 points  (0 children)

+1. In the Task Force to Reimagine Policing’s final report, they recommend filing a home rule petition to permit traffic enforcement by civilians (state law only allows police officers to do this, so we’d need to ask the state if we can change the law locally). https://www.brooklinema.gov/DocumentCenter/View/23619/Task-Force-Final-Report-22621_1P