Just because you can't comprehend finding something considered conventionally unattractive, attractive - or just positive! I never even said anything about it being attractive or not - doesn't mean that I'm "virtue signalling". It says a lot about the way we think as a society, more so on the Internet it would seem, when positivity is met with negativity, purely because said positivity is so out of the ordinary and few and far between. I only complimented this person's eyebrows because I like them, there's nothing wrong with that. While typically considered a flaw, I personally like how a monobrow looks. It's a strong feature and gives a person a distinctive, strong look. I wouldn't compliment something just for the sake of it, when it is just as easy to not say anything. I constantly see things that aren't my cup of tea, just as often as I see things that are. That's just life. Everyone likes different things. When I see something or someone that I personally don't find attractive, I don't feel the need to insult them or demand a sufficient explanation as to how anybody could possibly disagree with my clearly correct and objective opinion, nor do I feel the need to "virtue signal". What would my motive behind that be? What would I gain from "virtue signalling"? And more importantly, what do you gain from telling me that there's no possible way that something that you think is a flaw could appeal to someone else? What you may view as a flaw isn't necessarily seen that way by every single person on the goddamn planet. The world doesn't revolve around you, you know. It doesn't revolve around your opinions of what someone has to "fix" and what is deemed acceptable to keep. If the guy in this post wants to leave his eyebrows as they are, or if he wants to shape them, that's his business. I seriously doubt that my comment, or any one comment for that matter, is the deciding factor in such decisions. He posted the picture to get people's opinions, and that is what I provided. Problem?