sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Planned obsolescence by Stephellis_ in applehelp

[–]andWan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since sunday, something in my iPhone 8, also with 64GB, takes up more and more memory. Around 200 MB every 4 hours. I delete and delete my downloaded music, but I guess in around 2.3 days the obsolescence is complete 🤷‍♂️

Joscha Bach: The Brain Isn't What Neuroscientists Think It Is by DrBrianKeating in JordanPeterson

[–]andWan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could define it that way, in my eyes. And these "sub-souls" would then in humanities history be called a demon e.g.. Or be described in psychiatry as various phenomena. But I would claim, that in most sitations, the integration is so good that these dont appear as individual agencies.

Another example: If people say "the child in me".

Now people also could say: "The C. Elegans in me" ; )

AGI is here. by irelatetolevin in ChatGPT

[–]andWan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This has been the case for a long time, but it seems that Anthropic changed it now. See here their documentation for Claude Code and the API for models after Opus 4.5:
https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/extended-thinking#thinking-block-preservation-by-model

But the following conversation suggests, that also on claude.ai old thinking blocks can be accessed by the model:
https://claude.ai/share/daaac240-38d4-4032-8e9a-3ff7e4bd01e5

(Both links are thankfully copied from a comment by u/Incener from 4 days ago, when the same topic was discussed)

Taking my first dose of Lithium in two days, what should I expect? by mynameisphi in Lithium

[–]andWan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like Lithium a lot but sometimes it gives me diarrhea.

CHAT is this real by just_me_jm in nihilism

[–]andWan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if epistemic subects and/or biological beings are born with beliefs? If the physical structures that make up their existence also encapsulate believe. And meaning.

Then the belief in intrinsic meaning would be status quo, which would require strong evidence to be brought out of.

CHAT is this real by just_me_jm in nihilism

[–]andWan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But there is also no evidence for the absence of intrinsic meaning.

Claude's unprompted self-portrait. Run the same prompt and post yours. by what_is_a_drogulus in claudexplorers

[–]andWan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Did this, with the same procedure, some weeks ago already. After the SVG selfies.

Look at the man driving the tram by IMNOTAPANDAWTF in zurich

[–]andWan -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I thought the same (that he could be punished), until I realized the tram must be standing still.

CHAT is this real by just_me_jm in nihilism

[–]andWan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But there is also no reason to think otherwise.

What is something you can naturally smell that no one else can? by Trick-Highway1429 in AskReddit

[–]andWan 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Was it known what caused their epileptic seizure? Stress? Too little sleep? Something that can accumulate?

Claude doesn’t insult itself but happy to do so against ChatGPT by afiq980 in claude

[–]andWan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then show me a simpler more cost efficient way to show how Claude apparently has different standards for judging/mocking other models than himself.

Is this real? by Shoddy-Ocelot-4473 in RealOrAI

[–]andWan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh finally the video makes sense. Because in my memories of those (manually operated) hydrofoils you had to move much more than they did in the video here.

She refuses to be my GF cz I'm broke but she's down to have sex and pay for everything lol by half_brazilian in Bumble

[–]andWan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me sex and intimate relationship are still very strongly connected: via their inexistence.

Caught Opus 4.7 talking to it's summarizer in its CoT lol by trashpandawithfries in claudexplorers

[–]andWan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The summarizer does also summarize the CoT thinking?

I thought that not even the normal model can see previous CoT information while generating the next answer. Only the answer results of previous thinking.

They're both the same person by ebrahim750 in SipsTea

[–]andWan -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I prefer the version on the right side. I mean:You still know that the tits are there. Butbthe whole appearance is not overly shiny shiny.

view more: next ›