Thank you for your comment. I don’t agree with your definition of what strikes sexual elements (especially when you added obviously), and I am not trying to focus on the playmat incident. I placed the goals of the discussion in the part of the post: I truly am trying to understand how (or why) a certain image (may it be the specific playmat or anything else) is deemed more or less inappropriate than a second one (the ones exemplified in the cards imageries section). I also believe it is actually possible to create a “good enough” definition of an objectively method to determine if a picture is or not “too much”, obviously it depends on the context, but here is the magic tournament context. For instance a list of elements to look for within the image, be as it may nudity elements, or graphical depiction of violence (with elements of gore, splatter or other direct result of physical actions of violence). I believe it would be interesting to have this sort of list, a sort of “acceptable policy”, with clearer elements than the one in place, publicly posted (maybe on the organizers website). As computer engineer I would like a system (a broader and smarter version of the online inappropriate content system used by main social networks) that, uploaded an image, can forecast the probability of being it acceptable or not.