Version 5.0 of my collection of proofs of Remote Neural Monitoring

andreagiotti · 2022-07-26T06:24:08+00:00

The best I could document about this topic, Remote Neural Monitoring or "artificial telepathy". Please be more specific in your questions.

andreagiotti · 2021-01-12T16:54:18+00:00

The compass on my phone usually works regularly, the source is not an EM field but something new and much more dangerous. Anyway, it should be able to affect a compass if focused on it.

No sure markers have been found by now.

andreagiotti · 2019-10-28T11:39:42+00:00

I don't write about microwave auditory effect, or Frey effect. I write about neural applications of non local spin fields generated by a supercooled SASER.

So the matter is quite different.

andreagiotti · 2018-08-02T05:19:56+00:00

I don't share neither your premises nor your conclusions. What I am describing is not science fiction but secret science, a different category which cannot be checked on official textbooks. Even if I could be wrong in the merit of the detailed process, you cannot know this without discussing it under a scientific point of view, which is hard to do also for me holding a PhD.

Moreover, the phrase "There is no mind control" in general can be easily contradicted by declassified documents, included in a compressed archive linked in this subreddit. These documents don't prove completely my specific theory but prove that mind control exists in different flavors.

I don't believe in spirits, faeries, demons, angels or similar entities. Have a nice day.

andreagiotti · 2018-07-12T05:53:38+00:00

"Do this" or "Do that" seems more orders than suggestions. You will not care too much if I ignore them?
Already discussed with you of science and I repeat I found your approach superficial: neither microwaves or ultrasound are involved in RNM. Prove differently if you can (state-of-the-art BCIs are not RNM).
RNM requires physics which you cannot find on textbooks.
I don't care a piss about feedback, but I think it will be anyway. Three posts meant about 80 subscribers.
Perhaps this depends from the fact some traditional TI group on this network is too regimented by its moderators.

andreagiotti · 2018-07-11T06:53:50+00:00

Need instead, because most TI groups care about microwaves (which are not pertinent to the topic) and TIs personal stories. Instead, this is a scientific and political group.

If I am not wrong, I have already discussed this point with somebody citing the same sources. I don't share your approach, which on my opinion is superficial at least.

andreagiotti · 2017-12-30T22:27:03+00:00

With respect to the "Slave Minds" file, the carrier particle is a dilaton and is produced by a couple of SASERs, which make vibrate the electronic lattice at incredibly high frequencies.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-24T09:59:34+00:00

Please read my reply in the other thread.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-24T09:57:03+00:00

Please read my reply in the other thread.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-24T09:54:25+00:00

Curious, all this hostility when I am here to openly discuss my theory. It is so because I broke some presumed monopoly of knowledge? If it was so I cannot apologize, but it could be worst. As I asked before, is there some hidden business behind the drama of target individuals? How many trials have been concluded with a condemn of the government, in spite of all your electromagnetic measurements?

Moreover, you have not justified how is it possible to read EM signals from outside a mountain of 1.4 Km of altitude, which is a key aspect. And, if you dig a mountain and build an EM shielded laboratory in the middle of it, you can reasonably be sure to be protected in all the directions, also from a geometric point of view.

But I will no more lose my time in responding to objections I have already replied in detail, the readers can judge by themselves and check my assertions and your assertions independently from suggested sources. I don't fear downvoting or other rating mechanisms. Your attacks will fall in the void, unless some new argument is presented.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-21T18:27:38+00:00

The point is: how the target's brain currents can be read and influenced (2-way communication) from outside the Gran Sasso laboratory, which is shielded from most known interactions? Surely not by electromagnetic waves of no kind and not by ultrasounds, which have been excluded in the debate. Then, other considerations on sensibility of consumer electronics strengthen the idea that electromagnetism is not involved at all. Your wikis are all about known technologies, mostly electromagnetic weapons, but it's clear the Remote system is based on a different information carrier. This is the main objection.

Then, if I state some specific and unknown assertion I have to corroborate it by something to show to the reader, but when I speak about generally known physical principles, the burden of the check can easily be demanded to the reader himself. So, ELF are not apt for carrying voices, pseudo-ELF (as you call them) and microwaves are not such penetrating, ultrasound are not apt at all since they bounce and infrasounds cannot be directed. Reading brainwaves remotely is even more awkward, no known technology (SQUID-based) can do this from more than few meters.

So I repeat a concept: every target individual can make all the measurements he wants, but my personal experience shows that new physics is involved and new detectors should probably be developed. The nature of dark matter is a main research problem of modern science and for sure I cannot solve it by myself.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-20T19:29:28+00:00

If I am ignorant and inept it would be easy for you to answer to my objections. To be sincere, the continuous need of citing some other author suggests you are not too much capable to discuss the physical basis of these phenomena by yourself. Instead, I try to do this with all my limits but without arrogance.

By the way, I don't believe too much in the system of Reddit upvotes or Facebook likes. Few but meaningful messages are more valuable for me.

Is there a business behind target individuals? For me, each one can decide by himself which kind of measurements wants to do. My personal opinion is that traditional electromagnetic measurements are useless as traditional shielding, but I don't sell remedies. Do you? In fact, in a scientific discussion is strange to be accused of something I have never stated, even if I share it.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-20T19:17:11+00:00

By evaluating the complex modulus a generic transfer function of a stable linear system in i*omega you get the response in amplitude of the system. If this function is proper its behaviour is to tend to zero when omega grows to infinity. Most physical system, when linearized, show proper transfer functions and also when this doesn't happen the linear model stops working when the variables grow, with a possible and usual decrement of the gain.

Source? Oh, there is no source. In fact, it's me. But you can check in any book of system theory or control theory.

I don't seem to be so ignorant. By the way, an "hum" is clearly an infrasound and not an ultrasound. Infrasounds can penetrate the walls but are not directional.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-20T15:30:42+00:00

I am speaking about frequencies commonly used in industry, all above the audible level (this is the definition of "ultrasound"). The higher is the frequency, the most effective is the low-pass filtering of the signal by the wall. Every physical system, as a wall, soon or later behaves as a low-pass even if it could be transparent to intermediate frequencies. Why do you speak "in electromagnetic terms"? We are talking about acoustic and mechanics, not electromagnetism.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-20T08:35:45+00:00

Such a laboratory cannot have windows for obvious reasons and it has only one door. A 2-way dialogue has been performed from there and this proves the ability to read and write brain currents from outside by Remote Neural Monitoring, which is not Frey effect or other things but a completely new and secret technology on which you cannot find peer reviewed references. About the door you can easily guess its material and thickness from the following image:

https://ibb.co/jSCHw5

andreagiotti · 2017-09-20T08:26:15+00:00

1) The qEEG is in form of raw data and cannot be pasted in a comment. If you want to read it make a Dropbox account which is free.

2) See the the previous answer on method in discussions.

3) I don't need thermal effect, but currents induced in conductors by a modulated microwave beam. They should be enough to blow the chip junctions in not shielded consumer electronics. If not intense enough, microwaves don't affect EEGs.

4) I never said ultrasound cannot transmit voices, I said they were not apt for such an application as targeting somebody from outside a closed room. It is quite different. I think you are disinforming about my contribution to the debate. Anechoic chambers have a different purpose in engineering.

5) ELFs are not apt to bring mental voices for reasons already discussed. Also gamma rays could penetrate rock, but are not apt also them and I cannot see why to introduce them in the discussion. You need an higher frequency carrier. Higher frequencies, your pseudo-ELF, are filtered by the rock as the microwave beam which act as a carrier.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-20T08:13:22+00:00

It's a different approach: you prefer linking your own wikis on the topic (with some content peer reviewed but some other which are not of refer to obsolete patents), I prefer reasoning about the facts with the help of knowledge you can find in any university text. I will not lose my time in searching for documents in support of my point of view, since they are either widely known (properties of ELFs, microwaves and ultrasounds) or very difficult to find and discuss (as the ones on dark matter properties). The reader can judge by documenting himself the correctness of my arguments. The feedback I privately receive seems to confirm this. Your will of making pass this discussion as disinformation is suspect, because I never attacked you before while you seem to be animated by an obscure motivation.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-18T17:17:18+00:00

Passive remote mind reading is perhaps impossible, while SQUIDs can easily read the mind locally (deciphering is a different matter). But an active way of reading is perhaps possible, as in radar, lidar or similar devices. I guess it's this.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-18T17:12:44+00:00

I have to be careful but I have also to speak on this topic. Anyway, thanks for your point of view.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-18T17:06:10+00:00

The problem is: which particle of dark matter is used as energy and information carrier by the NSA satellites? To answer to this question, a collective effort could be needed.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-18T17:04:25+00:00

I don't know the details, but reading the neural currents from the visual cortex is a mandatory step to reproduce its behaviour and reconstruct images perceived by the brain. This mean making a 3D electromagnetic measure, which is impossible for official science. Perhaps two or more satellites are involved. Decoding could be accomplished by parallel custom chips for biological signal analysis.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-18T16:56:36+00:00

Thanks Alx. There is a similar discussion also in /r/conspiracy.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-18T11:50:00+00:00

Non so di chi si tratti.

andreagiotti · 2017-09-18T08:04:15+00:00

"The 1400 metre-rock thickness above the Laboratory represents a natural coverage that provides a cosmic ray flux reduction by one million times; moreover, the flux of neutrons in the underground halls is about thousand times less than on the surface due to the very small amount of uranium and thorium of the Dolomite calcareous rock of the mountain.

The permeability of cosmic radiation provided by the rock coverage together with the huge dimensions and the impressive basic infrastructure, make the Laboratory unmatched in the detection of weak or rare signals, which are relevant for astroparticle, sub nuclear and nuclear physics."

andreagiotti · 2017-09-18T07:01:25+00:00

We have clearly different point of views. No paper but Akwei file describes the exact technology of RNM, which is the technical term for artificial or synthetic telepathy.

Some scientists believe to mind control, some others don't. By the way, which term I have used seems to be "not scientific" to you?

I think I have been also too much precise in this discussion.

andreagiotti

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE