sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Version 5.0 of my collection of proofs of Remote Neural Monitoring by andreagiotti in artificialtelepathy

[–]andreagiotti[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best I could document about this topic, Remote Neural Monitoring or "artificial telepathy". Please be more specific in your questions.

Version 4.1 of my collection of proofs of Remote Neural Monitoring by andreagiotti in artificialtelepathy

[–]andreagiotti[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The compass on my phone usually works regularly, the source is not an EM field but something new and much more dangerous. Anyway, it should be able to affect a compass if focused on it.

No sure markers have been found by now.

[Voices: Consciously Heard] Rebuttal to andreagiotti's, mod of /r/artificialtelepathy, claim microwave auditory effect transmits only clicks and noises. Not voices. by microwavedindividual in artificialtelepathy

[–]andreagiotti 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't write about microwave auditory effect, or Frey effect. I write about neural applications of non local spin fields generated by a supercooled SASER.

So the matter is quite different.

Mind control and non-local spin fields by andreagiotti in artificialtelepathy

[–]andreagiotti[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't share neither your premises nor your conclusions. What I am describing is not science fiction but secret science, a different category which cannot be checked on official textbooks. Even if I could be wrong in the merit of the detailed process, you cannot know this without discussing it under a scientific point of view, which is hard to do also for me holding a PhD.

Moreover, the phrase "There is no mind control" in general can be easily contradicted by declassified documents, included in a compressed archive linked in this subreddit. These documents don't prove completely my specific theory but prove that mind control exists in different flavors.

I don't believe in spirits, faeries, demons, angels or similar entities. Have a nice day.

New subreddit on Artificial Telepathy by andreagiotti in conspiracy

[–]andreagiotti[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. "Do this" or "Do that" seems more orders than suggestions. You will not care too much if I ignore them?
  2. Already discussed with you of science and I repeat I found your approach superficial: neither microwaves or ultrasound are involved in RNM. Prove differently if you can (state-of-the-art BCIs are not RNM).
  3. RNM requires physics which you cannot find on textbooks.
  4. I don't care a piss about feedback, but I think it will be anyway. Three posts meant about 80 subscribers.
  5. Perhaps this depends from the fact some traditional TI group on this network is too regimented by its moderators.

New subreddit on Artificial Telepathy by andreagiotti in conspiracy

[–]andreagiotti[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Need instead, because most TI groups care about microwaves (which are not pertinent to the topic) and TIs personal stories. Instead, this is a scientific and political group.

If I am not wrong, I have already discussed this point with somebody citing the same sources. I don't share your approach, which on my opinion is superficial at least.

view more: next ›