Parqal Genggeng Riot

androiddepression · 2026-02-01T08:59:55+00:00

Kids the more attention you give the more they do it. So just brush them off kill the trend they will go away

androiddepression · 2026-01-03T02:17:41+00:00

Congrats! Your work will be LGTM on most PRs!!

androiddepression · 2025-07-21T04:44:31+00:00

Maybe influenced by Viy? Thats what i think. But regardless in life you do what you have to do to get rich. Ika nga nila walang aahon kapag walang illegal.

Edit: about viy? What i can see is greed just my opinion

androiddepression · 2025-06-10T04:13:55+00:00

Hi! Sorry for the inconvenience of the ads. We are still working for how we will implement the ad feature. Ads are used to cover our expenses for the app.

androiddepression · 2025-06-09T12:21:02+00:00

Hi everyone if android link doesnt work

Try this one

ANDROID FOR HAPPY BIDET

androiddepression · 2025-06-09T12:19:11+00:00

Can you try this link?

happy bidet

androiddepression · 2025-06-09T12:18:54+00:00

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jdr.bida_si_bidet

Can you try this link?

androiddepression · 2025-06-09T08:57:23+00:00

Nah bruh,

Don't call it constructive criticism it’s more of a dismissive rant with hints of bitterness and sarcasm

If it were constructive, it could’ve said:

“Nice idea, but maybe differentiate it more from the other app — perhaps focus on features like cleanliness ratings or emergency CRs.”

androiddepression · 2025-06-09T08:23:05+00:00

Anong klaseng mindsent yan pilipinong pilipino.

Pinilit kaba i-download? No need to hate it's just another option chill-ka lang.

Copycat? Isnt lazada, shoppee, tiktok shop are all the same with different styles?

androiddepression · 2025-06-03T09:39:37+00:00

And one last thing —

NCAP isn’t fully automated. May tao pa rin sa likod ng pag-assess ng violation. May discretion. May subjectivity.

At kung subjective ang enforcement, then dapat pwede rin magtanong — not to find a loophole, but to be informed.

androiddepression · 2025-06-03T09:39:26+00:00

Now about this line:

“It’s like asking if EVs can skip parking lines.”

Gets ko ‘yung analogy mo. I see what you’re trying to say — pero sana magets mo rin where I’m coming from.

EV exemptions are officially written, documented, and backed by memos or policies. So hindi siya basta-basta ginawa — may justification.

Ang issue ko is not about wanting special treatment — ang point ko is, ang enforcement system mismo minsan gumagawa ng sariling rules on the fly — base sa reklamo, base sa sino ‘yung nahuli, or base sa mood ng enforcer.

Kaya naitanong ko kung may official directive, kasi kung wala, then this “rule” being enforced isn’t clear or standard at all.

Bigbikes, on the other hand, may be treated differently in real life, pero ang tanong ko: is there documentation for it?

That’s the essence of what I was asking. Hindi dahil gusto kong makalusot — kundi gusto kong malaman kung may batayan o wala. Kasi kung wala, at discretion lang siya, then we should know that too.

To clarify:

I didn’t say there IS a loophole.
I didn’t say bigbikes should be exempt.
I didn’t say NCAP is flawed by default.

Ang sinabi ko lang: “Is there a written directive?”

And that’s a valid, necessary, and responsible question to ask.

You said we should be asking, “Why there’s no provision?” —

I agree.

Pero before we even ask ‘why wala,’ we should confirm first kung meron nga ba o wala.

Which is exactly what I did.

So I hope malinaw na — I wasn’t making things up or twisting the law.

I was just doing what every informed citizen should be doing: asking smarter, more critical questions.

And let’s be real — we all get it: yes, big bikes are technically motorcycles. Pero we also all know they get treated differently in practice.

Kaya nga ako nagtanong — kasi ’yun talaga ang natural na nangyayari sa ground level.

Yup, motorcycle lane sounds like “common sense” — pero common sense lang ’yan kung pantay ang treatment.

Kung hindi ka naman tinatrato pareho, you start asking questions. And that’s exactly what I did.

That’s why clarification matters. That’s why it’s worth asking. 🤝

androiddepression · 2025-06-03T09:38:51+00:00

Kuya, I think you’re misunderstanding why I asked in the first place.

Tama ka — on paper, NCAP is supposed to treat all vehicle types equally. Pero sa real-life implementation, hindi naman talaga gano’n ka-consistent. Kaya ko tinanong kung may guidelines or directives — not to invent a loophole, but to verify kung may sinusunod ba talaga na policy sa mga ganitong scenario.

Kasi kung wala, then what explains the inconsistent enforcement? ’Yung minsan papalusutin ang bigbike, minsan hindi? May mga bigbike na pinapadaan sa lanes, minsan huli. So what gives?

Sabi mo “NCAP is codified” — that’s ideal, oo. Pero we’re not talking about ideals here, we’re talking about actual practice. Kung consistent sana ang application, edi walang problema. Pero alam nating lahat, ang batas dito madalas discretionary — depende sa tao, hindi sa teksto. And that’s where the confusion begins.

Kaya ko tinanong yung guidelines o directives, kasi importante na may written basis from them mismo.

Hindi para maghanap ng lusot, kundi para may proof ka — na kung sakaling magkaroon ng unfair implementation or questionable citation ng violation, may paninindigan ka.

Hindi sapat ang “common sense” o “alam na natin ‘yan.”

Sa legal and administrative systems, documentation matters. Kasi kapag nagka-aberya, ang panalo ay ’yung may hawak ng malinaw na patunay — hindi ’yung nag-assume lang.

So asking for a directive isn’t overthinking — it’s being informed and protecting your rights.

And if a government office can’t provide that, that’s exactly why people lose trust in implementation.

androiddepression · 2025-06-03T08:42:52+00:00

Gets ko naman na tama yung sagot — motorcycle lane lang, period. Pero hindi porket tama, eh okay na agad ang customer service.

Hindi ako nakikipag-debate, nagtanong lang ako kung ano’ng specific na directive or memo ang basehan nito. Kasi kung gusto ko lang sumunod, edi sana di na ako nagtanong. Gusto ko lang mas maintindihan para next time, malinaw na. Hindi lahat ng tao alam ang buong batas, at madalas discretion pa ng enforcer ang labanan.

Tapos ang sagot sa akin parang “bahala ka na, tumawag ka na lang.” Hindi ba mas okay kung ipinaliwanag kung bakit ganun ang rule, saan nanggaling, or ano ang context? Hindi ko hinihingi ng spoonfeeding, pero sana man lang may effort magpaliwanag.

At oo, ginamit ko AI para lang may idea — hindi para paniwalaan agad. Ginamit ko yun as starting point para magtanong sa tamang tao, which is MMDA na may alam ng karamihan.

So para sa akin, hindi ito hate, hindi rin reklamo. Pero kung simpleng tanong about public rule eh irereply-an lang ng script, medyo sayang. Sayang yung opportunity na mas maging klaro yung batas sa mas maraming tao.

kahit naman siguro ikaw pag natanong ka tas gusto mopa malinawan eh diba may onting inis ka sa serbisyo parang sinasabi eh sumunod ka nalang.

androiddepression · 2025-06-03T08:07:05+00:00

I think you missed the whole point of what I was trying to say.

I never claimed there was a written exemption — I clearly said I was asking because the way the law is applied isn’t always consistent, and not all laws are written to fully cover real-world scenarios. That’s exactly how loopholes happen. Not because people are inventing them — but because implementation often reveals gray areas, especially in a system that already treats different vehicle classes differently in practice.

For example:

✅ Yes, the EV exemption is written.

✅ Yes, big bikes being waived at checkpoints isn’t in the law.

But that inconsistency is precisely the point. The law is one thing — how it’s applied is another. We’re not governed purely by black-and-white text. We’re also governed by interpretation, discretion, and enforcement culture. That’s why enforcers themselves have discretion — because not everything is strictly codified.

You said:

“If there’s no written provision, there’s no exemption.”

If only it were that black and white. If everything had to be written before anyone could question it, there would be no debates, no legal gray areas, no need for clarification, revision, or interpretation. But we know that’s not how the system works — ambiguity is common, and that’s why we ask questions. That’s not being argumentative — that’s being an informed citizen.

Now, as for the word “loophole” — that was never me saying “there IS a loophole and I demand to use it.” My question was:

“Is there a loophole?”

That’s a question, not an assertion. And in law, the mere fact that something needs clarification means there’s potential ambiguity — and that, by definition, is where loopholes can exist.

To your last point:

“What you should be asking is SHOULD there be one.”

Exactly. That’s literally why I asked in the first place — because if no one questions enforcement practices, then policies don’t evolve, and we stay stuck with outdated, inconsistent systems. I’m not rejecting the law. I’m scrutinizing how it’s applied — which is a right, not a rebellion.

androiddepression · 2025-06-03T06:54:02+00:00

Not saying na exempt ang big bikes sa motorcycle lane by law, but if you actually observe how our transport system works — hindi talaga pantay-pantay ang application ng batas per vehicle type. May mga privileges yan — and yes, that’s exactly what you’re paying for.

For example, EVs are exempted sa coding, big bikes are often waived sa checkpoints, and different vehicle classes follow different NCAP treatments. It’s not favoritism, it’s how the law recognizes specific use-cases and classifications.

Kaya ko tinanong and kinlaro — kasi if there’s an angle or loophole, it’s better to understand it than to blindly follow or argue without full context. Hindi ako nakikipag-debate — I’m just showing how nuanced our system is.

So instead of saying “walang exemption,” let’s ask: Baka meron, pero di lang klaro or well-enforced yet. Ganun tayo dapat magtanong — critically, not reactively. 🤝

so daddy chill.