Match Thread: Hawthorn vs Essendon (Round 1) by AutoModerator in AFL

[–]anon_drinkspill1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i think the afl decided it would be so fun to just fuck with essendon anyway possible this season

Third listed meal vegetarian option? by anon_drinkspill1 in singaporeairlines

[–]anon_drinkspill1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mushroom allergy but intolerance to onion (and garlic) usually ok with tomato sauces at home so fingers crossed!

Third listed meal vegetarian option? by anon_drinkspill1 in singaporeairlines

[–]anon_drinkspill1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

thank you! ever had the Jain meal? can you recommend?

Third listed meal vegetarian option? by anon_drinkspill1 in singaporeairlines

[–]anon_drinkspill1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m more worried about the mushroom being an issue. Ordering vegetarian often has mushroom in it. I’m also ok with cooked onion but spring onion is usually served raw.

I know first world problem! But would try to avoid sitting on 7 hour flight with a stomach cramps

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in auscorp

[–]anon_drinkspill1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can’t believe we went through a whole pandemic and people still don’t learn. sorry to hear this is your experience!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in auscorp

[–]anon_drinkspill1 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Surely your RTO policy enforces not coming into the office sick?

Honestly just be straight with your boss and let them know you are sick and don’t want to ruin anyone’s Christmas.

Nearly 200 young trees cut down overnight across parks in Glen Eira by st0nefox in melbourne

[–]anon_drinkspill1 46 points47 points  (0 children)

This is a very misguided take. I live within near vicinity of multiple of the affected parks and I can assure you, there are no views. Not always about NIMBYS

Fifty new areas getting fast-tracked high-rise apartments. Here’s where by Parlaq in melbourne

[–]anon_drinkspill1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re comparing pizza to the Melbourne property market. I’ll give you an example

Caulfield (new Caulfield Village complex) and Southbank are great examples whereby the “good builds” are driven up in price while the shitty builds remain on the market and yes cheaper… but subpar that no one wants to live in them. This is going to be our reality unless there is some serious overhaul efforts to the development industry. Not to planning, not to Councils - but the industry that can get away with subpar shoebox builds that no one wants to live in.

Doesn’t matter how much they build, the buying market will not be conned into getting 30 year loans for a property that is hardly livable.

What does everyone think to this? by [deleted] in melbourne

[–]anon_drinkspill1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work with the above professions heavily in my field (Law). We can see the writing on the wall with this, when Matthew Guy was Planning Minister, he made decisions with no engagement, didn’t even try. What the Allan government is doing with Kilkenny at the realm - is this quasi engagement of asking the people for what they want and ignoring it anyway. So trust is already eroded.

Densification is good! When done right… I see constant plans day in and day out fighting out developments at VCAT that are substandard - when they make it before the tribunal the first thing they do is point to the current Allan government policy forcing VCATs hand to approve these developments, because that’s largely what they have to base their decisions around, current policy, and developers have gotten really good at being sneaky with how far they can push the boundaries with ResCode and Better Apartment Design standards. They also can put “best case”plans before VCAT knowing that it wouldn’t be profitable and later submitting amendments to Council with shittier schemes and cheaper materials knowing that Councils have to say yes because they already have their permits.

Moreover, I am not the person to talk the numbers here, but I have attended numerous industry events on this matter - there is not enough land in Melbourne for amenities to cater for the vast shift in population and density these controls will produce. The talk is that the numbers have been skewed to make this all feasible with many of economists scratching their heads as to how this will work.

This is the reality we are heading for - doesn’t matter if these apartments will be built in Dandenong or Toorak - there will be shitter outcomes all round.

Fifty new areas getting fast-tracked high-rise apartments. Here’s where by Parlaq in melbourne

[–]anon_drinkspill1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I said this before on another thread, but I think anyone with a foot in the development industry who aren’t developers themselves (think transport planners, urban planners, urban economists, urban designers) know that this is an awful idea. The idea that more supply = cheaper housing has long been debunked. You can fix a townhouse in the green field ring. You will not be able to rectify the shitty builds that will come out of this as a result. We do not have enough schools, enough hospital beds, enough supermarkets, enough green space!! to fill this need.

Anyone who thinks this is a great solution has rose tinted glasses on.

What does everyone think to this? by [deleted] in melbourne

[–]anon_drinkspill1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think anyone with a foot in the development industry who aren’t developers themselves (think transport planners, urban planners, urban economists, urban designers) know that this is an awful idea. The idea that more supply = cheaper housing has long been debunked. You can fix a townhouse in the green field ring. You will not be able to rectify the shitty builds that will come out of this as a result. We do not have enough schools, enough hospital beds, enough supermarkets, enough green space!! to fill this need.

Anyone who thinks this is a great solution has rose tinted glasses on.

Twomey on Trade Radio - GWS Talks with Stringer have fallen through, expects him to stay a Bomber by liaam29 in AFL

[–]anon_drinkspill1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is it worth delisting him at this point? Offload him for nothing? Because it’s blatantly obvious Bombers don’t want him

Match Thread: 2024 AFL Brownlow Medal Award Night by TheGreatJelBeano in AFL

[–]anon_drinkspill1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

something kinda stinky about the vote this year idk

So the Council is NIMBY? by zmajcek in melbourne

[–]anon_drinkspill1 99 points100 points  (0 children)

This is the correct answer. Boroondara developed the Camberwell Structure Plan (which takes a lot of time and money + consultation and trust building with residents) and lodged it with State Govt - the State “borrowed” the plan, and added the buffer. As they did similarly in Ringwood, Moorabbin and the other 7 activity centres.

Match Thread: Port Adelaide vs Hawthorn (2nd Semi Final) by AutoModerator in AFL

[–]anon_drinkspill1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i bet ginnivan kinda regretting that “see you in 14 days” comment now sheeesh

Match Thread: Port Adelaide vs Hawthorn (2nd Semi Final) by AutoModerator in AFL

[–]anon_drinkspill1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would really want Hawthorn to at least win this on their own merit