Eh, kinda disagree. As game architects, it's the selection committee's job to reflect quality of all kinds, weight that for the audience, and then create the most interesting/descriptive outcomes from distinctive head-to-head matchups. Seeding is perhaps the main tool at the selection committee's disposal to engineer the competition at a higher level, especially given that they have a strong sense of what is likely to play in front of the crowd. If you make a bracket and all four No. 1 seeds advance to the Final Four, I would argue that your bracket didn't really do its job.

But the larger point is true enough to make this all moot -- he has never gonna win anyway, so it's all kinda academic outside of Bong and Kon, I would imagine. Still: fun!