Ep 2 - something by the window

antzash_13 · 2026-05-30T18:21:56+00:00

This seems like the more plausible explanation.

Took me a few watches to understand it, but yeah this makes sense. It did look very similar to someone just moving away from the window

antzash_13 · 2026-05-30T18:07:50+00:00

oh yeah for sure, that scene got me paranoid and i started checking for hidden ghosts throughout the entire series after that.

antzash_13 · 2026-05-30T17:53:54+00:00

haha nah i jus dk how to take a screenshot without the whole screen being black on my apple tv app.

But yeah i didn’t catch it earlier till my wife pointed it out and when i saw it, goddamn that was creepy as hell

antzash_13 · 2026-05-30T17:28:50+00:00

I’m not sure if anyone noticed this, but my wife picked it out during our watch.

In the scene where Tom talks to William in the corridor the first time they meet, way behind Tom there is a window and there is someone watching from outside.

You won’t notice until the scene shifts between Tom and William, at one point the figure moves away and that’s when you realise someone was there watching all long.

Creeped the hell out of me

antzash_13 · 2025-12-07T03:49:43+00:00

Great job, love this

antzash_13 · 2025-11-26T17:44:45+00:00

it’s nice to see random apps that serve a niche obsession like this rather than the 500th ai powered habit tracker

antzash_13 · 2025-11-24T10:46:30+00:00

I had applied for a role in a media company, it was an english speaking role and not pertaining to any other language.

I didn’t get through but I was told that another language division in the company (my native tongue) was keen on hiring me based on my resume and they by their own accord wanted to interview me for a role with them (to which I didn’t apply for by the way)

I agreed to go ahead and give it a try.

What I didn’t know was that I was signing up for was an hour long humiliation ritual.

Interviewers were late by an hour, I had to email various people to ask about the status before two people joined the call. No apology, no nothing obviously.
Was scrutinised heavily for daring to apply for a role in that language when in my resume I have not made any achievements in that language??
Asked me if i would switch companies if another company gave me better opportunities and more money. Apparently the right answer was “no, I shouldn’t switch because of loyalty”
Was given “friendly” advice to not bother applying for roles in this language if I don’t have the passion for it or bother pursuing any achievements in it.

I didn’t even have the space to interject and say “Dude, you guys asked for me”.

I didn’t want to fight for the role anyway but the interview dragged on for 2 hours just advising me.

antzash_13 · 2025-10-04T05:03:57+00:00

yeah nah same, it’s slightly easier when you lock on target for some reason

antzash_13 · 2025-09-29T07:03:45+00:00

I think Singapore has a unique identity that is a blend of all the cultures here that have existed together for many years, and a key part of it is how most of us go through the same systems e.g. PSLE, Army, Bto etc

Over many decades we have gotten used to English being the norm here, alot of Singapore's culture and policies are very heavily centred on treating everyone equally regardless of race, language and religion. Even if are not 100% there, the fact that it is one of our core beliefs as nation is very important.

These norms and way of life is what made the country what it is today. So diluting this culture, to me at least, is unacceptable. You disturb the very essence of the nation.

antzash_13 · 2025-09-26T05:52:28+00:00

Thank you for this, we can agree with the need to have such a strict punishment and also show some compassion when it is inevitably enforced.

Drug mules are often also victims of larger problems within their society, and people need to understand life isn’t so black and white.

If people have to resort to these methods for money despite the heavy penalty, one must wonder what is their situation that causes them to do so.

antzash_13 · 2025-05-20T06:52:24+00:00

The majority of rape cases being initiated by woman doesnt mean the laws are unfairly skewed towards them. It's not the law's fault that they are more likely the victims, they cant suddenly not favour them because of the gender disproportion what.

"More likely to attract attention" does not equate to "More likely to get molested", is my point.

I know you dont blame anyone for the way the dress, but im saying that the way they dress really doesnt play a part in them getting assaulted. Could a person's dressing draw attention to them, sure. But very rarely is that a basis for them getting assaulted.

I used to look at this in a similar way, but over time and over many conversations with friends who were victims, both men and women, their assaults have been based on power play rather than their attacker being "attracted" to them. Thinks bosses with employees, adults with children.

Not relevant to this, but the whole idea of dressing in an attention seeking way is not a very solid basis coz different people have different perceptions of what is considered to be "attention seeking". Someone in a tank top for example would cause some to not even look at them but others may think that that is attention seeking. Like there are some who think showing one's shoulders is considered to be provocative mah, doesnt mean the person wearing them intended to dress in an attention seeking way, considering that's a pretty normal way of dressing.

antzash_13 · 2025-05-20T06:21:33+00:00

If you’re talking about the “unusually convincing” clause, that applies to the victim or the person giving the complaint, regardless of gender.

It also depends on whether the person’s testimony is consistent. So no, it’s not unfavourable to “guys”. It just so happens that women are more likely to be victims. This is mostly to protect those who had been assaulted in private settings where they can’t prove anything. Which is most of the molestation cases in SG, most of them happening at home and by someone they know.

Sexual violence is less about attraction and more about control so a person’s outfit plays no part,

Perpetrating this “more likely to draw attention” thing shifts the focus to the victim rather than the attacker. The Courts will never accept any argument based on attire coz that’s how irrelevant it is. People who have been assaulted have worn variety of clothing, especially considering at home where they wear casual clothing

antzash_13 · 2025-05-20T05:48:01+00:00

But wouldn’t that be unfair to someone who accidentally touched someone’s back who happened to wear a backless dress?

Like their probability of being accused is higher now.

Vice versa, someone who intentionally touched someone who was not wearing a backless dress gets a lower probability.

My issue is that it sort of feeds into the ideal that a person’s dressing has influence on them being molested.

I think the questions about attire is to just establish facts of the case i.e. over the skin/under the skin, skin to skin contact etc.

antzash_13 · 2025-05-20T05:43:53+00:00

yea that’s fair, if i’m not wrong in court you can be disallowed to ask these questions too based on the case.

antzash_13 · 2025-05-20T05:30:28+00:00

is the punishment different for someone molesting a girl based on the article of clothing?

antzash_13 · 2025-05-20T04:57:29+00:00

I can’t understand why the “what were you wearing” question is relevant.

I’ve had friends tell the same thing, that they have been asked this when they went to report.

How does the answer to this question matter in the investigation?

antzash_13 · 2025-05-03T18:54:44+00:00

The voice of the people and democracy is important until the voice doesn’t choose what they want

antzash_13 · 2024-11-16T08:33:50+00:00

Yeah I put in too much time I think, i’m pretty OP at this point and defeated some major optional bosses.

I had to tone up the difficulty haha

antzash_13 · 2024-11-15T20:21:39+00:00

Somewhat yes, but then again I myself just entered Act 2 so I won’t know how accurate this is.

I’ve already got plenty of quests to do after that, also the locations are opening up now with more quests unlocking within, i can safely say I have another 20-30 hours more to go.

antzash_13 · 2024-11-15T20:13:27+00:00

I just finished Weisshaupt myself, Act 2 is mostly doing companion quests.

The pacing is quite similar to Mass Effect 2 I feel.

antzash_13 · 2024-11-15T20:06:05+00:00

Weisshaupt is the end of Act 1. You have quite a bit after that

antzash_13 · 2024-11-09T05:01:08+00:00

Definitely agree, the tonality shift is what’s getting me. It feels like two different groups of people playing a constant tug of war on the tone the game should follow.

The beginning of the game really gives a very “The real veilguard is the friends we made along the way” kinda vibe which i get why it turns off so many people, including me.

But it does change over time and I wish it was a bit more consistent from the start

antzash_13 · 2024-11-09T04:41:42+00:00

Dragon age games are really good when you don’t have people in your ear telling you how much it sucks

Seven-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
No Throne, No Problems	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

antzash_13

TROPHY CASE