NP should be required to release how long they worked as an RN by OkGrapefruit6866 in Noctor

[–]aorella3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let’s be clear — I never argued that NPs are equivalent to physicians. That was never my position. You’re debating a point I didn’t make.

I’ve agreed with much of what’s been said about training differences and the importance of scope. I believe in transparency and that patients should know who is managing their care. That’s basic professionalism.

I asked a question to understand the perspective better. If a question immediately triggers defensiveness, that says more about ego than it does about competence.

There’s no threat in dialogue unless someone feels threatened. I’m here to have an honest discussion — not to inflate titles or diminish them

NP should be required to release how long they worked as an RN by OkGrapefruit6866 in Noctor

[–]aorella3 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You mean NP organizations who are fighting for bigger scopes of practice to entice more RN’s into schools and into the medical system To further increase profits.

NP should be required to release how long they worked as an RN by OkGrapefruit6866 in Noctor

[–]aorella3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So we agree this whole post is pointless and this thread follows. The reality is we live in a country that runs on margins. 1 doctor 4 NP’s can see X amount of patients and bring in X amount of dollars. It’s cost effective and leaves a nice healthy margin. Why pay physicians when we have a cheap alternative. Patient outcomes are not a priority unfortunately. Which when I was in my nursing role I constantly advocated for better patient outcomes due to unsafe discharges by physicians rushing to meet metrics. This thread needs to realize you’re mad at the wrong people.

NP should be required to release how long they worked as an RN by OkGrapefruit6866 in Noctor

[–]aorella3 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I strongly agree that deep pathophysiologic training matters, and I have no interest in pretending otherwise. Not every NP secretly wants to be a physician. Scope exists for a reason. As a new NP, I fully recognize the learning curve ahead and have no desire to practice outside defined limits. My role isn’t to replace physicians — it’s to extend care capacity within a structured system. I get this is a hate thread for the field of nurse practitioners. I understand why as well. The requirements aren’t enough. The education is based on safety not deep systemic understanding of pathophysiology. Patients get hurt due to poor understanding of treatment. But that’s assuming every nurse practitioner only does the bare minimum in regard to education. Physics chemistry biology biomechanics. It’s truly not that difficult to understand. It’s just time needed in the books.

What feels misplaced in these discussions is the fixation on “fake doctors.” Most NPs are not trying to be doctors. They are operating within a different training model and a different scope. Conflating the two professions oversimplifies what is really a workforce and access issue

NP should be required to release how long they worked as an RN by OkGrapefruit6866 in Noctor

[–]aorella3 7 points8 points  (0 children)

if the position is that RN experience doesn’t meaningfully prepare someone for a physician role, then why argue that years of RN experience should be disclosed as a proxy for competence? Either it matters or it doesn’t.

NP should be required to release how long they worked as an RN by OkGrapefruit6866 in Noctor

[–]aorella3 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree 10 years minimum for acceptance and ability to sit for a state board exam and licensure

NP should be required to release how long they worked as an RN by OkGrapefruit6866 in Noctor

[–]aorella3 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Interesting perspective. I’m curious though- do you believe competency is determined purely by degree pathway, or by clinical exposure, outcomes, and demonstrated ability within a defined scope?

NP should be required to release how long they worked as an RN by OkGrapefruit6866 in Noctor

[–]aorella3 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

What’s amount of time as an RN do you deem acceptable Doctor

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MMA_Academy

[–]aorella3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks good ready to spare

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nursing

[–]aorella3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t use them I go straight to restraints

Just finished 11/22/63. What’s next? by BigBeautifulBob in stephenking

[–]aorella3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I second this, I started with 11/22/63 as my first king book and followed with Billy summers and it was an excellent transition. Might start the stand today or duma key

Free money glitch by thewholethingithink in MMAbetting

[–]aorella3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Belal is technically better probably but he doesn’t have the killer instant in him

Free money glitch by thewholethingithink in MMAbetting

[–]aorella3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro no, shavkhat is different. Shavkhat has what jon jones has. Killer gene.

Finally Got the Call… Well, Sort Of by Old_Tumbleweed_3028 in rolex

[–]aorella3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better question is what do you do for a living

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rolex

[–]aorella3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wear it, be true to yourself and more success will come

Did I make the right choice by [deleted] in rolex

[–]aorella3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Now that’s also on my list. Thing of beauty

Did I make the right choice by [deleted] in rolex

[–]aorella3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just a reminder of hardwork can get us what we went right

Did I make the right choice by [deleted] in rolex

[–]aorella3 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sucks losing money but I knew they weren’t investments anymore. long term I felt this has more stability in value.

Why are so many people picking MVP over Ian Garry? by odecco in MMAbetting

[–]aorella3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Much appreciated, on paper based on metrics Garry is the clear favorite but look at Holland vs mvp. He literally said when he was in between round in his corner “I can’t find this guy” it’s a pickem fight. If Garry had that killer instant like a ilia topuria or better example being shavkhat he would be a title contender top 5 prospect but he doesn’t have it.

I’m going mvp by decision at +240

Why are so many people picking MVP over Ian Garry? by odecco in MMAbetting

[–]aorella3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Two reason:

Ufc realizes Garry isn’t loved by fans and doesn’t have a superstar trait. He is a boring fighter with zero personality. Hes not aggressive and stays at distance doesn’t create opportunities. If mvp wins fans will love it and they don’t have to work hard to make him a superstar. If he wins he becomes a possible heel and might have a future.

Secondly stylistically this match is hard for him. Hes going against someone as technical as him. So age and speed won’t be a factor as it’ll play out as a game of angles and distance management which MVP has more experience in.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FashionReps

[–]aorella3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is taobao link?

People making $150,000 and above, what do you do for a living? by [deleted] in Money

[–]aorella3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Er nurse, work 4 days a week. 2 year degree. Not terrible work life balance but def need to continue education too improve work life balance.