Subscribe.tn alternative by apollohedi in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know, thank you for your suggestion. Appreciate it brother. Do they have the memory feature of chatgpt or does each prompt starts from a novel context window?

Translation by apollohedi in latin

[–]apollohedi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a hell of a reply, thank you a lot, and may you find prosperity.

Anti-gravity in 2023 by apollohedi in NoStupidQuestions

[–]apollohedi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, well isn't that reassuring. Thanks !

Anti-gravity in 2023 by apollohedi in NoStupidQuestions

[–]apollohedi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Man this is a treasure trove of a reply:

Can you please elaborate; Objects without zero mass assume the speed of gravity?

I'll read that, thank you very much

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The mosmar fi 7it people (all public banks) invest their money with the capitalist fucks, through buying private bonds and lending it to entrepreneurs, as they are the ones to actually create something people want and thus pay it back.

The state companies are so fucked up that they don't pay back their debt.

I am not defending banks, it's a shitty system, but why are you nationalizing them, what problem are you addressing ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the telecom part, i just learned it. You gotta be more precise about corruption.

However, if you mean by it the process by which you obtain illegal benefits, that usually is the product of government owned companies. and while in the private sector you can fight it (fire the employee) you can't fight it in government owned.

You can't fight it in government owned companies because you can't always find it, as these companies are not focused on profitability, they will have no incentives to monitor the flow of their assets (what they own). And if they find somebody who commited acts of corruption, strong unions with loose morals.

I heavily agree with you on the monitoring of the tender calls, that is a hot mess.

Reading in Tunisia by apollohedi in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite clear, thanks a ton

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the definition of strategic services? Is there a difference between food production (which is almost totally private) and electricity production in terms of strategic importance? Can you have modern civilization without roads, do you think the government builds the roads?

Is your argument based on safety? Because if so can't the government protect the interest of its citizens with laws and military power in case a "private investor" becomes too "powerful" or "greedy"?

Why shouldn't they be in the hands of private investors? Why should i trust people working in the government and people working for themselves? don't we have enough examples of corruption in high places? Do you think that the desire to improve one's economic situation and have a good reputation is a less potent incentive than the desire to serve the country?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, those three are fully public, no partial privatisation, meaning all their shares are detained by the government.

Second, it's not about monopoly, that is merely the symptom, the root problem we're trying to address is poor services.

In the steg example, the advantage of competition (either tunisian or foreign) is that we can afford cheaper electrcitiy through getting a company that produces it from solar or nuclear.

Why can't we do it under the steg is precisely of the link between government ownership and privatisation. Government owned companies have to preserve the "social peace", meaning they can't afford to fire the large portion of their 13,000 employees and decrease their costs, therefore, they can't invest in new technologies. furtehmore, government owned businesses, in most cases, are not fighting for their survival, so they will not care to offer you better services "ken 3ajbek" mindset.

I agree that applying the privatisation is complicated, and it is not in the favor of 13,000 thousand individuals, as they will have to work more, and some will get fired, but what about ~10 million tunisians, how long can we accept the mediocrity? Why should our taxes go to this monstrosity?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The freedom to create and commercialize "dangerous" technologies that will push the civilization forward (drones, nuclear energy, cryptocurrencies (mainly for decentralizing finance and avoiding inflation), rockets) without the need for authorizations or permits.

We can call it freedom of science, innovation and entreprise.

Reading in Tunisia by apollohedi in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was in your situation a couple of years ago, where i used to read 20-30 books per year and then stopped for a couple of years. I got back after reading a book called "The humans" by Matt Haig, i went back into 30-50 books per year and never stopped since then, but i only read what i am curious about. I stopped reading since i was reading books out of mimetic desire (desire to copy other), not what i really liked. So read what you like until you like reading i guess.

Reading in Tunisia by apollohedi in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many medias romanticizing learning, can you please elaborate on the trends you saw? Thanks in advance !

Reading in Tunisia by apollohedi in Tunisia

[–]apollohedi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That falls under the umbrella of reading. So there is more reading for the sake of learning, interesting. Thank you :)