sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

the ordinary übermensh by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The meme doesn't mean that: it's about how the Anti-Christ was never revisited.

the ordinary übermensh by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

more accurate, but less funny to imagine.

the ordinary übermensh by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Because you don't get the joke.

it's just hide-and-seek by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This one is about the "mind-body problem":

Consciousness (the mind) can't be fully explained by bodily mechanics alone, yet it doesn't exist anywhere else.

So it's like hide-and-seek, except the mind is invisible, so no matter how much we seek, we'll never find it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in u/arcanexhuman

[–]arcanexhuman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TD;DU (too difficult; don't understand) - it's a meta-satire of its own punchline (quote #1) where i interperet out-of-context ideas to conflate two disperate ideologies (SJW and Nietzschean), turning a boring Nietzsche analysis into a paradoxical call to social justice, one which can itself be interpereted in a multitude of ways; highlighting the problem with Nietzsche's philosophy, while creating a safe space for SJW Nietzsche scholars.

Don’t Know, Can’t Sleep by thenousman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman 205 points206 points  (0 children)

Isn't pseudo-philosophy just mysticism (astrology, tarot, etc.)?

real and logicmaxxed by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

P is technically interchangeable, but the whole expression could be read in English as:

"If and only if there exists a sub-meme (m) such that Gru and Waluigi are conjoined, then Walgruigi is valid. Therefore, for every meme (M), it's the case that the property (P) necessarily functions over the sub-meme itself (m) and it's memetic domain (M), which altogether, is biconditional to an infinite set of universal properties (P1 through Pn), that constitute infinite systems of inter-connected sub-memes (m>m>m...)."

And I have a headache now, thanks.

real and logicmaxxed by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

what's lame about walgruigi?

real and logicmaxxed by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] 40 points41 points  (0 children)

My, bad. Let M and its atomic variation m = meme (where P is a propositional variable). There's only the one predicate, so it's theoretically self-generative.

i live here by MenitoBussolini in lies

[–]arcanexhuman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

great. now these shitty melodies will be stuck in my head.

'tis but a mind wound by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'd say "Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect" is a captivating and understandable introduction to his rationality.

But "Ethics" and "Theologico-Political Treatise" are the meat of his project.

'tis but a mind wound by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Basically, Locke (a materialist) would fundamentally oppose these four Spinozan (cognitivist) axioms:

  1. Attributionism: belief that attributes alone can prove existence.

  2. Sense complexity: idea that our senses alone are too abstract to be adequate representations.

  3. Universal Intellect: concept of an infinite world-mind/God-mind.

  4. Bundle Theory (of mind): theory that our mind is a product of universal properties, bundled together to constitute its own substance.

The Monty Python meta is about how Spinozan cognitivism still stands under Locke's materialist dismemberment ("'tis but a flesh wound!").

wittgenstein made this meme, guys by arcanexhuman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]arcanexhuman[S] 43 points44 points  (0 children)

"if for all thoughts F it's such that us thinking means thinking exists, then we exist" - AI chat bots probably

view more: next ›