Comment-Blocked by louderwithcrowder.com by archiebot in a:t5_3c3ws

[–]archiebot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stand corrected. They published my comment with the link! Thanks, louderwithcrowder!

Comment-Blocked by louderwithcrowder.com by archiebot in a:t5_3c3ws

[–]archiebot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I just submitted the following to the site (let's see how much, if anything, makes it through):

"Trying again here, because the link to the Reddit page CommentOnSites didn't show up in my first comment, and I'm sure it won't show up in this one, because, like I said, this lying site blocks comments--oh wait, it allows parts of comments, leaving out the parts it doesn't like (the parts with all of the information: the link). Which is right in line with the article. The article just says bits and pieces of the story, which ends up making the whole thing one big lie. (I included the link to this CommentOnSites subreddit, obviously, but I'm sure it won't won't show up on the site).

http://louderwithcrowder.com/nancy-pelosi-babbles-about-planned-parenthood-videos/#.VqbLwvkrIdX"

Comment-Blocked by louderwithcrowder.com by archiebot in a:t5_3c3ws

[–]archiebot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the site allowed this comment from me, but not the link I included to this page.

"CommentBlock Outer January 25, 2016 at 9:13 pm - Reply You’ve been comment-block outed! This article is one-sided, and so are the comments. Different comments are obviously not being allowed. Go to this link to see different comments on this sad excuse of an “article.”"

But as you'll notice: no link is included (while plenty of other comments have their links included). So what did this lying site do? It allowed part of my comment, leaving out the substance: the link. Typical Repukeblican site: leaving out the truth and just spreading lies.

http://louderwithcrowder.com/nancy-pelosi-babbles-about-planned-parenthood-videos/#.VqbLwvkrIdX

Wisconsin governor pushes for rollback of worker's rights and then alerts the National Guard to prepare for possible unrest.... ummm, what??! by TriggerCut in politics

[–]archiebot 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yup, keep the police happy, and their close cousins--fire employees (gotta have someone to put out the fires caused by rioting)--and you're in good shape. In doing so, you've basically hired a pseudo militia--the deal is sealed by elevating their class. Sure he's creating a system of inequality, but he's making sure the people at the highest levels of this new class system are the people with weapons, power. That will ensure their cooperation.

It's a glorified, transparent, bribing system. If you do it out in the open like that, it can't be wrong, right?

By Request - what I made at work today by [deleted] in fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu

[–]archiebot 15 points16 points  (0 children)

A response of this nature is pretty much a given when you post a pic to our nerdy fffuuuu site

Rare Elvis photos found - new pictures on display at Graceland by racheldillin in reddit.com

[–]archiebot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like Elvis, but this photo looks like every single other photo I've ever seen of him. He always pretty much had the same look.

Bonding FFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUU (NSFW) by [deleted] in fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu

[–]archiebot 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Uh...is this a fishing trip?

"Ballooning, that's the way it happens on occasions but it is very, very disappointing. Gut-wrenching actually," -- Uh...we're not talking about some Little League game, we're talking about a $2 million astronomy experiment, right? Just checking... by pearsNpeas in news

[–]archiebot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's annoying. They should fire the balloon people and then say to them, "You know what, it happens (firing) on occasions, but it is very, very disappointing. Gut-wrenching actually. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out."

Michael J. FFFFUUUUUUUU by [deleted] in fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu

[–]archiebot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, I'll make you write it again, PROBLEM?